Revision summary
The claim pairs old means with progressive ends. Tilly shows repertoires stick; some Indian movements fit. Digital PIL and majoritarian restoration break the pair. Touraine already mixed cultural means and new agendas. Treat means and agenda as independent variables.
Model answer
Introduction
- The formula splits means and ends: old repertoires of march, shrine, and kinship, with new rights talk. Some movements fit. Many do not. Means can be networked and new; agendas can restore hierarchy.
Body
When the formula fits
- Charles Tilly’s repertoire is sticky: petition, strike, fast, and pilgrimage recur.
- Chipko and some temple-entry or shrine-based mobilisations used familiar sacred and village means for livelihood or dignity claims.
- Identity movements may use caste association form for reservation, a modern state agenda.
When it fails
- Progressive means can be digital campaigns and PIL, not primordial at all.
- Agendas may be majoritarian restoration, not emancipation.
- Alain Touraine’s new social movements already mixed cultural means and post-wage agendas.
- Farmers’ tractor marches were industrial means with mixed agrarian agendas.
Explanation
- Means and agendas vary independently. Primordial and progressive are not a necessary pair.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MEANS[Means old or new] --> IND[Independent mix] AG[Agenda restore or reform] --> IND PAIR[Primordial means progressive agenda] --> PART[Only some cases]
Conclusion
Some Indian movements wrap new claims in old ritual means. The generalisation is false. Means can be modern and agendas conservative, or the reverse. Analyse each movement’s repertoire and aim.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India
Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q5(b)). View answer →
-
Is a religious fast always primordial?
As a technique it is old. As media spectacle it can be thoroughly modern.
-
Are identity movements progressive by definition?
No. Recognition claims can include equal rights or exclusive purity.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain democracy as an order of society. What are the factors preventing people's participation in politics? -
2020 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine how social movements come to an end. Illustrate with examples. -
2018 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the challenges thrown by religious revivalism to a secular nation-state. -
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the dynamics of pressure group in multi-party political system -
2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the importance of 'power elite' in democracy. -
2016 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the role of protest movements in changing the status of Dalits in India. -
2016 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
To what extent revolution replaces the existing order of society? Discuss.
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How can you assess the significance of social movements in the digital era? Explain
Politics and Society
Social movements now use platforms for recruitment, framing and witnessing. Connective action personalises protest and lowers coordination costs. Significance is high for speed, scale and agenda setting. Limits include digital divide, surveillance, rumour and weak staying power. Older resource and opportunity theories still explain durable success. Indian protests and relief campaigns show amplification, not replacement, of the street.
Q4(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What would you identify as the similarities and differences in the elite theories of Mosca, Michels and Pareto? Discuss their main/crucial issues
Politics and Society
Mosca: an organised ruling class justified by a political formula. Michels: organisation produces oligarchy even in egalitarian parties. Pareto: elites circulate; lions and foxes name styles of rule. Similarities: minority power, scepticism toward literal popular rule and toward Marxian class monopoly of explanation. Differences: political formula versus party oligarchy versus psychological residues. Crucial issues: accountability, recruitment and whether democracy can discipline elites.
Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are pressure groups a threat to or a necessary element of democracy? Explain with suitable illustrations
Politics and Society
Pressure groups influence policy without ordinarily taking office. Pluralists treat them as necessary vehicles of interest articulation. Critics note unequal organising power, capture and majoritarian or caste intimidation. Olson explains why concentrated interests beat diffuse majorities. Indian farmers’ protests, chambers of commerce and caste associations show both voices and capture. The answer is conditional: necessary, and dangerous without equality and transparency.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.