Revision summary
Revivalism politicises faith and crowd. It challenges secular law, public space, education, and the monopoly of force. Bellah’s civil religion can turn exclusive. Indian principled distance is strained by majoritarian and street politics. The live defence is equal citizenship, not forced unbelief.
Model answer
Introduction
A secular nation-state claims citizenship above a single church. Religious revivalism re-sacralises public life and often a people. The challenge is to law, monopoly of force, and equal membership.
Body
What revivalism does
- It intensifies practice, organisation, and political claim, not only private piety.
- Max Weber’s prophets and Max Weber’s later charisma help; so does Durkheim’s sacred crowd, now on television.
Challenges to the secular state
- Personal law and uniform codes: which community’s family is the nation.
- Public space: procession, conversion politics, and blasphemy as tests of equal protection.
- Education and history: textbooks as sacred memory.
- Violence and vigilantism rival the state’s monopoly of force.
- Majoritarian revival can turn the nation itself into a church, which Robert Bellah’s civil religion warned can be inclusive or exclusive.
Indian present
- Constitutional secularism as principled distance, after Rajeev Bhargava, is strained by street veto and party- mobilised faith.
- Minority security and majority hurt become competing languages.
What the state can still do
- Equal civil rights, prosecution of violence, and refusal to baptise one faith as the nation.
- It cannot pretend Weberian disenchantment is complete.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD REV[Religious revivalism] --> LAW[Personal law street school] REV --> NAT[Nation as church] SEC[Secular state] --> EQ[Equal citizenship] NAT --> CHAL[Challenge] LAW --> CHAL
Conclusion
Religious revivalism challenges the secular nation-state by recoding law, street, school, and belonging. The state is tested on equal citizenship, not on emptying belief. Civil religion can support the republic or swallow it.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Are social movements primordial in means and progressive in agenda? Explain
Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q5(b)). View answer →
-
Is all public religion revivalism?
No. Everyday practice can coexist with secular law. Revivalism is organised intensification with a political claim.
-
Does secularism require banning faith?
It requires that the state not become one community’s church.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain democracy as an order of society. What are the factors preventing people's participation in politics? -
2020 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine how social movements come to an end. Illustrate with examples. -
2018 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Are social movements primordial in means and progressive in agenda? Explain -
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the dynamics of pressure group in multi-party political system -
2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the importance of 'power elite' in democracy. -
2016 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the role of protest movements in changing the status of Dalits in India. -
2016 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
To what extent revolution replaces the existing order of society? Discuss.
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How can you assess the significance of social movements in the digital era? Explain
Politics and Society
Social movements now use platforms for recruitment, framing and witnessing. Connective action personalises protest and lowers coordination costs. Significance is high for speed, scale and agenda setting. Limits include digital divide, surveillance, rumour and weak staying power. Older resource and opportunity theories still explain durable success. Indian protests and relief campaigns show amplification, not replacement, of the street.
Q4(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What would you identify as the similarities and differences in the elite theories of Mosca, Michels and Pareto? Discuss their main/crucial issues
Politics and Society
Mosca: an organised ruling class justified by a political formula. Michels: organisation produces oligarchy even in egalitarian parties. Pareto: elites circulate; lions and foxes name styles of rule. Similarities: minority power, scepticism toward literal popular rule and toward Marxian class monopoly of explanation. Differences: political formula versus party oligarchy versus psychological residues. Crucial issues: accountability, recruitment and whether democracy can discipline elites.
Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are pressure groups a threat to or a necessary element of democracy? Explain with suitable illustrations
Politics and Society
Pressure groups influence policy without ordinarily taking office. Pluralists treat them as necessary vehicles of interest articulation. Critics note unequal organising power, capture and majoritarian or caste intimidation. Olson explains why concentrated interests beat diffuse majorities. Indian farmers’ protests, chambers of commerce and caste associations show both voices and capture. The answer is conditional: necessary, and dangerous without equality and transparency.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.