Revision summary
Movements end by success, co-option, repression, split, or exhaustion. Institutionalisation can be victory and an ending of the street form. Michels and Tilly explain oligarchy and closed opportunity. Labour deals, anti-corruption peaks, and NGO displacement illustrate. Women’s movements often cycle rather than die. Examine which form ended, not only the grievance.
Model answer
Introduction
Social movements are collective challenges with some continuity and a public claim. They end in several ways: success, split, repression, co-option, or fade. Ending is a process, not a single death certificate. Resource mobilisation and political process theories help name the paths.
Body
Paths of ending
- Success and institutionalisation: the claim becomes law or a party. The movement as extra-institutional actor thins. Indian independence organisations and some environmental PILs illustrate.
- Co-option: leaders enter office; the cadre loses the street. Robert Michels’s oligarchy is a cousin.
- Repression and labelling: the state criminalises the claim. Charles Tilly’s repertoires meet a closed opportunity.
- Faction and identity split: goals multiply until the “we” breaks.
- Exhaustion and generation change: emotions cool, after Durkheimian effervescence fades.
- Goal displacement: the organisation survives as an NGO while the movement ends.
Illustrations
- Many labour strikes end in a wage deal and demobilisation.
- Some new social movements, after Alain Touraine, become lifestyle scenes.
- Anti-corruption waves in India have peaked, entered parties, and receded as street force.
- Women’s movements rarely “end”; they cycle, which feminist scholars stress against a male riot model.
Examine
- “End” can mean the campaign, not the grievance.
- Success can look like death of the extra-institutional form.
- Informal labour movements may end for a season and return, as Breman’s workers circulate.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MOV[Social movement] --> SUC[Success institution] MOV --> CO[Co-option] MOV --> REP[Repression] MOV --> SPL[Split fatigue] SUC --> END[End as street actor]
Conclusion
Movements end through victory, absorption, repression, split, or fatigue. Tilly, Michels, and resource-mobilisation theory map those doors. Indian nationalist, labour, anti-corruption, and women’s campaigns illustrate different endings. Examine the form that dies, not only whether the file closed.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the challenges thrown by religious revivalism to a secular nation-state.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q4(c)). View answer →
-
Does a law mean the movement succeeded and ended?
The campaign may end. Implementation struggles can start a new phase.
-
Can a movement end and restart?
Yes. Grievances and networks remain. Demobilisation is often a pause.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Analyse the nature of transition from ideology to identity politics in India. -
2022 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss how "environmentalism" can be explained with new social movements approach. -
2022 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples the role of pressure groups in the formulation of social policies. -
2021 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Explain how political parties and pressure groups are dialectically related to each other in terms of achieving their goals -
2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain democracy as an order of society. What are the factors preventing people's participation in politics? -
2018 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the challenges thrown by religious revivalism to a secular nation-state. -
2018 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Are social movements primordial in means and progressive in agenda? Explain -
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How can you assess the significance of social movements in the digital era? Explain
Politics and Society
Social movements now use platforms for recruitment, framing and witnessing. Connective action personalises protest and lowers coordination costs. Significance is high for speed, scale and agenda setting. Limits include digital divide, surveillance, rumour and weak staying power. Older resource and opportunity theories still explain durable success. Indian protests and relief campaigns show amplification, not replacement, of the street.
Q4(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What would you identify as the similarities and differences in the elite theories of Mosca, Michels and Pareto? Discuss their main/crucial issues
Politics and Society
Mosca: an organised ruling class justified by a political formula. Michels: organisation produces oligarchy even in egalitarian parties. Pareto: elites circulate; lions and foxes name styles of rule. Similarities: minority power, scepticism toward literal popular rule and toward Marxian class monopoly of explanation. Differences: political formula versus party oligarchy versus psychological residues. Crucial issues: accountability, recruitment and whether democracy can discipline elites.
Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are pressure groups a threat to or a necessary element of democracy? Explain with suitable illustrations
Politics and Society
Pressure groups influence policy without ordinarily taking office. Pluralists treat them as necessary vehicles of interest articulation. Critics note unequal organising power, capture and majoritarian or caste intimidation. Olson explains why concentrated interests beat diffuse majorities. Indian farmers’ protests, chambers of commerce and caste associations show both voices and capture. The answer is conditional: necessary, and dangerous without equality and transparency.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.