Revision summary
Fundamentalism is modern organised purity, not timeless faith. Religion matters as text, sect, charisma, and moral community. Marx, Weber, and Durkheim explain resources and meanings, not a simple piety motor. Parties, media, and failed secular promises organise the increase. Answer: important role as idiom; not a sufficient cause.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
Fundamentalism is a modern organised claim to restore a pure, inerrant foundation against pluralism. Religion supplies symbols and congregations. It is not a sufficient cause. Politics, media, and insecurity organise the increase.
Body
Reasons to say yes, religion matters
- Sacred texts and the church as moral community, in Emile Durkheim’s sense, can be tightened into an exclusive we.
- Max Weber’s virtuoso and sect types train high-demand certainty; charisma can fuse with scripture.
- Meaning and theodicy, which Weber stressed, become political programmes when the world looks unjust.
Reasons not to blame “religion” as such
- Karl Marx: religion is protest and veil; the increase often tracks class and nation, not piety alone.
- Secularisation’s incompleteness and the secular state’s failures feed reactive faith, which Bryan Wilson’s decline thesis did not fully predict.
- Media markets and parties instrumentalise faith. That is organisation, which Robert K. Merton would split into manifest piety and latent power.
- Indian public religion long coexisted with pluralism; the increase of fundamentalism is a political-historical shift, not a sudden birth of belief.
Answer
- Religion is an important resource and idiom of fundamentalism.
- The increase is explained by modern organisation of certainty, not by the mere existence of temples or churches.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD REL[Religious symbols church] --> FUND[Fundamentalism] POL[Parties media insecurity] --> FUND REL --> RES[Resource not sole cause]
Conclusion
Yes, religion plays an important role as sacred resource, sect discipline, and moral community. No, it is not an autonomous engine of the increase. Weber, Durkheim, and Marx together locate fundamentalism in modern politics using religious materials.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Religious pluralism is the order of present-day societies." Explain by giving suitable examples.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q7(a)). View answer →
-
Are all devout people fundamentalists?
No. Everyday practice and inclusive churches differ from organised inerrant politics.
-
Does secularisation end fundamentalism?
Incomplete secularisation and political use of faith can intensify it.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2025 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations -
2024 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do you view and assess the increasing trend of digital ethnography and the use of visual culture in sociological research? -
2024 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the roles of science and technology in social change. What is your opinion on their increasing trend in 'online' education and teaching? -
2023 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the relevance of corporate social responsibility in a world marked by increasing environmental crises -
2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Capitalism has brought increasing informalisation of work in society.Substantiate your answer.
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution
How does the rise of new 'cults' and 'sects' influence intercaste relations?
Religion and Society
• Neo-religious sects and cults act as catalysts, altering traditional ritual hierarchies and intercaste dynamics. • Groups like Radhasoami and Brahma Kumaris create egalitarian spaces where caste markers are secondary. • They continue Bhakti traditions, offering lower castes dignity and spiritual authority denied by orthodox structures. • Sectarian affiliation aids upward mobility, helping groups shed stigmatized identities through behavioral purification. • Independent economic and educational resources reduce lower-caste dependence on dominant agrarian castes. • While sometimes reproducing internal stratification, these sects largely promote societal democratization and equality.
Q3(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · Solution
Discuss the relationship between religion and science in modern society. Do they necessarily remain in conflict?
Religion and Society
• Modernity features the dual rise of scientific rationality and institutionalised secularisation.
Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution
What is the nature of relationship between science and religion in modern society? Analyze with suitable examples
Religion and Society
Comte expected science to replace theology; Weber expected disenchantment of technique. Secularisation is regional, not a universal emptying of faith. Relations include conflict, institutional separation and practical coexistence. Berger’s later desecularisation thesis matches much of the contemporary world. India shows high-tech science beside public ritual and sacred politics. The modern pattern is differentiation plus plurality, not a simple war.