Q4(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q4(b) Q5(d) →

Do you agree with the view that the EU has thus far proved to be the most successful experiment in the regional integration processes? Account for its successes and also some of the recent challenges that it is faced with.

Topic: Comparative Politics. Syllabus: Comparative Politics: Nature and major approaches; political economy and political sociology perspectives; limitations of the comparative method. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Comparative Politics.

Revision summary

The EU is the deepest regional integration: single market, supranational law, euro for many, Schengen and enlargement conditionality. Success is clearest against ASEAN, SAARC, Mercosur and NAFTA/USMCA in legal depth and peace among former enemies. Challenges: Brexit, Hungarian and Polish rule-of-law conflicts, migration splits, Russia’s war and energy shock, and incomplete fiscal union. NATO still holds the hard-security core. Verdict: most successful experiment so far, under a live stress test of political consent.

Model answer

Introduction

  • Regional integration is a crowded field: ASEAN, African Union, Mercosur, USMCA, SAARC. The claim that the European Union has so far been the most successful experiment is justified if success means depth of law, market and peace among former enemies. The same answer must account for recent challenges, or it becomes a brochure.

Body

Successes

The EU turned a coal-and-steel bargain among states that had destroyed each other twice in a century into a single market, a dense body of directly effective law, a Court of Justice, and, for many members, a single currency. Schengen made internal movement ordinary. Repeated enlargement spread democratic conditionality to Southern and then Eastern Europe. No other regional body has pooled so much regulatory sovereignty or produced so much intra-regional trade as a share of members’ lives. In the language of question 2(b), it is the home of the post-modern state. Compared with ASEAN’s informal consensus or SAARC’s freeze, the EU is a legal community, not only a meeting calendar.

Peace among France and Germany is the foundational success. The euro, for all its faults, is a political fact that NAFTA never attempted. Global standard-setting — data protection, chemicals, digital markets — gives the EU power beyond its military weight.

Recent challenges

Brexit was the first major secession. It showed that pooling is reversible and that identity politics can defeat market logic. Rule-of-law fights with Hungary and Poland exposed a gap: the Union has tools against backsliding, and it uses them slowly. Migration after 2015 split front-line and interior states and revived internal borders. Russia’s war on Ukraine ended the cheap-energy model and forced a security debate that NATO still dominates, which is the limit of EU strategic autonomy. Debt and inflation after the euro crisis and COVID strained North–South solidarity; joint borrowing was a step, not a finished federal treasury. Enlargement toward Ukraine and the Western Balkans will test absorption again.

These challenges are serious. They have not dissolved the single market or the Court. Success is therefore comparative and incomplete.

Verdict

  • Yes: the EU remains the most successful regional integration experiment in depth and in transforming interstate war into domestic-style law. No: it is not a finished federation, and the 2010s–2020s have been a stress test of consent. Other regions should copy institutions and law, not a fantasy of frictionless identity.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  EU[European Union] --> S[Peace market law euro]
  EU --> CH[Brexit rule of law migration]
  CH --> W[Ukraine energy debt]
  S --> V[Most successful comparatively]
  W -.stresses.-> V

Conclusion

The EU’s successes are peace among historic enemies, a single market, supranational law and a currency union for many members. Recent challenges — Brexit, rule of law, migration, war and fiscal strain — show the limits of consent. As a regional experiment it is still first in class. It is not beyond examination.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Discuss the rationale behind replacing the "Asia-Pacific" strategy with the new term "Indo-Pacific" strategy.

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2024 · Q5(d)). View answer →

  • Is ASEAN a fair comparison?

    Yes as regionalism, no as legal depth. ASEAN succeeded as a diplomatic community with less pooling. The EU’s claim is about integration, not about every regional goal.

  • Did the EU fail in Ukraine?

    It failed as a substitute for NATO hard power. It succeeded as a sanctions, finance and candidate-status actor. That split is the challenge.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    The expansionist tendencies of the current Russian regime indicate its intentions for the realization of a Greater Russia on the lines of the Soviet era. Comment.

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks

    "Deglobalisation is displacing globalisation." Comment.

    View answer →

  3. 2024 · Q2(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

    What were the limitations of NAFTA? How did its replacement by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement counter them? Explain.

    View answer →

  4. 2024 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

    The return of trade barriers and economic sanctions has diminished the spirit of GATT. In this context, discuss the factors contributing to the decline of WTO in recent times.

    View answer →

  5. 2024 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Discuss the rationale behind replacing the "Asia-Pacific" strategy with the new term "Indo-Pacific" strategy.

    View answer →

  6. 2024 · Q7(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

    "India and USA have become such strong strategic partners that they need not become formal allies." Comment.

    View answer →

  7. 2023 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are the crucial functions of empirical political theory in Comparative Politics?

    View answer →

  8. 2023 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are the difficulties faced by a political theorist in comparing the States?

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

NonAlignment 2·0 underscores India's unique aspiration to emerge as a site for an alternative universality. Comment

Comparative Politics

NonAlignment 2.0 (2012) restated strategic autonomy for a China-first, post-NAM world: partner the U.S., do not join it. Alternative universality means rules others can inhabit without becoming Western or Chinese tributaries. India’s civilisational pluralism, Global South voice, and issue-based coalitions are the claimed site. The aspiration is coherent; capacity in the neighbourhood and in manufacturing is the constraint. The risk is exceptionalism dressed as universality.

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

Trump's unilateral imposition of reciprocal tariffs on scores of countries poses impending threat to the future of the rule-based multilateral global trading system under the WTO. What options do the WTO members have to salvage the organization?

Comparative Politics

Trump’s 2025 reciprocal tariffs, on top of a blocked Appellate Body, treat MFN as optional and threaten WTO as policeman. Salvage options: restore appeals or widen MPIA, plurilaterals, a subsidy-for-S&DT reform bargain, G20 politics, and FTA hedges. India’s stake is public stockholding, digital rules and a forum in which power is not the only law. A variable-geometry WTO is more likely than a 1995 restoration. Letting the organisation die would leave only tariff nationalism.

Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

The tariff threats have pushed India and the European Union closer. Evaluate the India-EU partnership

Comparative Politics

U.S. reciprocal tariffs in 2025 threatened both Indian and EU exports and compressed FTA timelines. The partnership already includes TTC, climate talk, student mobility and a values vocabulary. Friction remains on agriculture, data, CBAM, Russia and human-rights politics. Directionally closer is true; a finished trade-and-tech pole is not yet true. India–EU is the best Western hedge if Washington stays protectionist, not a substitute for U.S. defence enablers.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.