Revision summary
Panchsheel made peaceful coexistence a named Indian doctrine with China in 1954. NAM and the UN carried the same language of sovereignty and non-interference. Wars and border crises show the cornerstone can crack. 1998 and later US and Quad ties add realist insurance. The phrase remains official; the practice is coexistence plus capability.
Model answer
Introduction
Peaceful coexistence is the claim that unlike systems can live without war if sovereignty is respected. India wrote it into Panchsheel and still recites it. Practice has added harder balancing.
Body
The cornerstone as doctrine
- The 1954 Panchsheel agreement with China listed mutual respect for territorial integrity, non-aggression, non-interference, equality, and peaceful coexistence.
- Jawaharlal Nehru carried the same vocabulary into Bandung, NAM, and the UN Charter’s friendly-relations language.
- The idea was a reply to Cold War bloc war and to colonial intervention, not a vow of passivity.
Continuity
- India still prefers diplomacy, UN process, and strategic autonomy over joining NATO.
- Neighbourhood First, Act East, and Global South voice keep coexistence as the public grammar of a civilisational State.
Strain and update
- 1962 with China, 1971 with Pakistan, Kargil, and 2020 Ladakh show that coexistence is a preference, not a guarantee.
- Nuclear tests in 1998, later Quad consultations, and logistics pacts with the United States sit beside Panchsheel talk.
- Realists such as Morgenthau would call coexistence a policy when power allows, not a law of nature.
Judgment
- The cornerstone remains the official first stone. The building now has more steel: deterrence, minilateral groups, and issue-based alignment.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Panchsheel 1954] --> C[Peaceful coexistence] C --> N[NAM UN diplomacy] C --> D[Deterrence Quad after shocks] N --> FP[Indian foreign policy] D --> FP
Conclusion
Peaceful coexistence is still India’s declared cornerstone through Panchsheel, NAM memory, and UN diplomacy. It has not been the only tool since 1962. Autonomy plus deterrence is the working mix.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Did 1962 kill Panchsheel?
It killed innocence about China. India kept the vocabulary for the world and added defence on the Himalaya.
-
Is Quad compatible with coexistence?
India presents Quad as consultative, not a NATO war bloc. Critics call it a tilt. Official doctrine still refuses alliance language.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2022 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India's foreign policy in the post-cold war period -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India's foreign policy choices? -
2022 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss India's vision of a New World order in the 21st century -
2021 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the five proposals made by India in the recent COP-26 conference held in Glasgow. -
2021 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the philosophical foundations of India's foreign policy. -
2021 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain India's position on the waiver of intellectual property rights on COVID-19 vaccines in WTO. -
2021 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main limitations of the comparative method to the study of Political Science.
Comparative Politics
Comparison substitutes for experiment, as Lijphart argued. Mill’s designs fail when variables outnumber cases. Galton’s problem and conceptual stretching are standing limits. Official data and Eurocentric concepts add political distortion. The method is disciplined inference, not a controlled trial.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the main challenges faced by the developing countries in the era of globalisation?
Globalisation
Globalisation opens markets and tightens external rules. Wallerstein’s hierarchy and Prebisch’s trade concern still describe many late developers. Capital flight, TRIPS, and farm subsidies in the North cut policy space. Inequality, informality, and climate costs are domestic faces of the same pressure. Regional and South–South bargains are the usual reply, not autarky.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the commonalities between the Marxist and Realist approach to the study of International Politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
Both approaches deny that trade and law automatically pacify world politics. Carr’s critique of utopia feeds realist and Marxist readings. Morgenthau and Waltz stress State power; Lenin and Wallerstein stress capital and hierarchy. Institutions are treated as masks or tools, not as a world government in waiting. The commonality is conflictual materialism; the split is State versus class.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.