Revision summary
EU members, especially Germany, had leaned on Russian pipeline gas. The 2022 war turned that flow into a coercive lever. Prices, storage, and winter risk became security politics. Diversification to LNG and non-Russian fuels is costly and incomplete. NATO’s front and EU energy policy now move together, against older commercial peace.
Model answer
Introduction
Russia’s war on Ukraine, intensified in 2022, turned EU energy from a market file into a security file. Pipeline dependence met NATO’s eastern front. The shadow is price, shortage risk, and a forced green-and-LNG scramble.
Body
The dependence that the crisis exposed
- Germany and several Central European members had built gas security on Russian pipelines, including Nord Stream, under a commercial peace assumption that Carr would have called utopian.
- Oil, coal, and nuclear fuel links added depth. Interdependence here was asymmetric, closer to a weapon than to Keohane and Nye’s benign complex interdependence.
Immediate shadow on needs
- Price spikes in gas and electricity hit households and industry across the EU.
- Threats to and damage around Nord Stream, plus Russian payment and cut-off politics, made winter storage a strategic target.
- Sanctions on Russian energy forced a hunt for seaborne LNG, Norwegian and North African gas, and US cargoes, at higher cost and with new infrastructure bottlenecks.
Alliance and order
- NATO’s reinforcement of the eastern flank and EU emergency coordination (including REPowerEU-type plans to cut Russian fuels) fused energy with collective defence.
- The crisis also split tempo: some members prolonged nuclear or coal; others accelerated renewables. Cohesion of needs is not cohesion of mix.
Wider IR reading
- Waltzian anarchy returned to a region that had treated energy as a functional spillover of the European Union.
- The Global South faced fertiliser and grain shocks too, but the question’s focus is EU members’ energy needs: they discovered that a revisionist supplier can hold the thermostat.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD W[Russia Ukraine war] --> P[Pipeline cuts prices] P --> E[EU energy needs] E --> L[LNG Norway US] E --> N[NATO plus REPowerEU]
Conclusion
The Russia–Ukraine war darkened EU energy security by revealing pipeline dependence, spiking prices, and forcing a rushed diversification toward LNG and non-Russian fuels. Functional European peace did not cancel realist supply risk. NATO and the Commission now treat kilowatt-hours as strategy.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Did the EU lose all Russian energy overnight?
No. Flows fell in steps, with oil and gas treated on different clocks. The shadow was uncertainty and price as much as a total cut.
-
Is this only a European story?
The question is EU needs. Globally the war also moved India and others toward discounted Russian oil, which is a different adaptation.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
"Trump's return to the White House is a jolt to push the European Union to invest in its own defence and economic and technological revival." Comment -
2025 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
The tariff threats have pushed India and the European Union closer. Evaluate the India-EU partnership -
2023 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Account for the rise of European Union as a highly influential regional organisation -
2021 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain India's relations with the European Union in the context of Brexit
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main limitations of the comparative method to the study of Political Science.
Comparative Politics
Comparison substitutes for experiment, as Lijphart argued. Mill’s designs fail when variables outnumber cases. Galton’s problem and conceptual stretching are standing limits. Official data and Eurocentric concepts add political distortion. The method is disciplined inference, not a controlled trial.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the main challenges faced by the developing countries in the era of globalisation?
Globalisation
Globalisation opens markets and tightens external rules. Wallerstein’s hierarchy and Prebisch’s trade concern still describe many late developers. Capital flight, TRIPS, and farm subsidies in the North cut policy space. Inequality, informality, and climate costs are domestic faces of the same pressure. Regional and South–South bargains are the usual reply, not autarky.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the commonalities between the Marxist and Realist approach to the study of International Politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
Both approaches deny that trade and law automatically pacify world politics. Carr’s critique of utopia feeds realist and Marxist readings. Morgenthau and Waltz stress State power; Lenin and Wallerstein stress capital and hierarchy. Institutions are treated as masks or tools, not as a world government in waiting. The commonality is conflictual materialism; the split is State versus class.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.