Revision summary
Both approaches deny that trade and law automatically pacify world politics. Carr’s critique of utopia feeds realist and Marxist readings. Morgenthau and Waltz stress State power; Lenin and Wallerstein stress capital and hierarchy. Institutions are treated as masks or tools, not as a world government in waiting. The commonality is conflictual materialism; the split is State versus class.
Model answer
Introduction
Marxism and realism are rival maps of International Politics. They still share a hard core: conflict, material power, and distrust of liberal harmony. E. H. Carr already stood near that overlap.
Body
Shared starting points
- Both reject Wilsonian and commercial-liberal claims that law, trade, or public opinion by themselves produce peace.
- E. H. Carr’s Twenty Years’ Crisis attacked utopianism. Realists read him as power politics. Marxists read him as a critique of liberal ideology.
- Politics is conflictual. For Hans Morgenthau it is interest defined as power. For V. I. Lenin it is imperialism as monopoly capitalism.
- Material capability matters. Kenneth Waltz counts poles of power. Marxists count class and the world-economy, as in Wallerstein’s later system.
Shared scepticism
- The State is not a moral person. Realists treat it as a security actor. Marxists treat it as tied to class and capital, yet still as a unit of war and law.
- International institutions can mask hierarchy. Realists see them as tools of the strong. Robert Cox’s critical theory, drawing on Marx, asks whose order a regime serves.
- History is struggle, not a smooth legal community.
The remaining divide
- The unit of analysis differs: State versus class and capital. The commonality is the refusal of a harmony-of-interests story.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD L[Liberal harmony] --> X[Rejected by both] R[Realism Carr Morgenthau Waltz] --> P[Conflict and power] M[Marx Lenin Wallerstein] --> P P --> I[International Politics as struggle]
Conclusion
Marxist and realist approaches meet in conflict, material power, and suspicion of liberal peace. They part on whether the motor is anarchy among States or capitalism and class. Carr is the hinge writer for that overlap.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Bipolar structure of the world is more stable than the multipolar one. Comment.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Did Marx write a theory of anarchy like Waltz?
No. Classical Marxism starts from modes of production. The overlap is conflict and power, not the same unit of analysis.
-
Is Keohane on this common ground?
No. Robert Keohane’s neoliberal institutionalism keeps egoist States but argues that regimes can still produce cooperation. That is the liberal-institutionalist reply to both.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics. -
2024 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the interpretive approach to the study of comparative politics. -
2024 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the central tenets of the World-Systems Theory. -
2024 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the various facets of the idealist approach to the study of international relations. Comment on its contemporary relevance. -
2023 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
In what ways does the functionalist approach in International relations help in maintaining peace and order in global politics? -
2021 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main limitations of the comparative method to the study of Political Science.
Comparative Politics
Comparison substitutes for experiment, as Lijphart argued. Mill’s designs fail when variables outnumber cases. Galton’s problem and conceptual stretching are standing limits. Official data and Eurocentric concepts add political distortion. The method is disciplined inference, not a controlled trial.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the main challenges faced by the developing countries in the era of globalisation?
Globalisation
Globalisation opens markets and tightens external rules. Wallerstein’s hierarchy and Prebisch’s trade concern still describe many late developers. Capital flight, TRIPS, and farm subsidies in the North cut policy space. Inequality, informality, and climate costs are domestic faces of the same pressure. Regional and South–South bargains are the usual reply, not autarky.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Bipolar structure of the world is more stable than the multipolar one. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Waltz held that two poles watch each other more safely than many poles. Cold War NATO–Warsaw pairing is the exhibit of central stability. 1914 illustrates multipolar chain-ganging. Proxy wars show that bipolar peace was not global peace. Deutsch and Singer, and later interdependence, qualify the law-like claim.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.