Revision summary
India and South Africa tabled a COVID TRIPS waiver in 2020. The claim was that patents blocked scaled production of vaccines and treatments. Doha public-health language was the legal-moral precedent. Compulsory licensing was judged too cumbersome for a global shock. Rich-country resistance narrowed the outcome; the Indian position stayed pro-waiver.
Model answer
Introduction
In October 2020 India and South Africa asked the WTO TRIPS Council to waive certain intellectual-property rules on COVID-19 vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics. India’s position was that patents were blocking scale in a pandemic.
Body
The demand
- A time-limited waiver of TRIPS obligations on patents, designs, and undisclosed information for COVID health products.
- Compulsory licensing under existing TRIPS was called too slow and too narrow when many countries needed to produce at once.
- The aim was technology transfer and generic manufacture, not a permanent abolition of IP.
India’s argument
- Public health emergency overrides ordinary rent from patents, in the spirit of Doha 2001 on TRIPS and public health.
- Vaccine nationalism and advanced-country buying left the Global South short.
- India as a pharmacy of the South claimed both capacity and a duty to supply.
The politics of the file
- Many developed members resisted a broad waiver. The United States later backed a narrower vaccine-focused discussion.
- A 2022 Ministerial compromise was thinner than the original India–South Africa text. The 2021 question is the demand, not that later deal.
Link to IR
- The episode is Cox-style: whose property regime a global institution serves in a crisis.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD IS[India South Africa 2020] --> W[TRIPS waiver proposal] W --> V[Vaccines diagnostics therapeutics] R[IP holders rich members] --> O[Opposition delay] W --> O
Conclusion
India, with South Africa, sought a TRIPS waiver so that COVID vaccines and related tools could be produced widely. The position treated IP as a barrier in a pandemic, not as an untouchable right. WTO consensus made the original wide waiver hard to land.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q5(e)). View answer →
-
Did India want to abolish pharmaceutical patents?
No. The proposal was a time-bound pandemic waiver for specified COVID products.
-
Was COVAX India’s substitute for a waiver?
India supported supply initiatives and still argued that IP rules constrained manufacturing capacity.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment. -
2022 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India's foreign policy in the post-cold war period -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India's foreign policy choices? -
2022 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss India's vision of a New World order in the 21st century -
2021 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the five proposals made by India in the recent COP-26 conference held in Glasgow. -
2021 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the philosophical foundations of India's foreign policy. -
2021 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
More from this topic
Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
A multipolar world is several great-power centres; it is hollow for India if Asia is Sino-centric. India’s threats, trade and waters are Asian, so Asian power-sharing is the real test of the slogan. Japan, ASEAN centrality, Korea, Australia and India beside China and the U.S. are the intended map. Quad and FOIP are instruments of pluralism, not a finished concert. The claim is right as strategy and still aspirational as fact.
Q5(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
China's growing footprint and a tangible shift in power dynamics in Bangladesh has weakened India's leverage in Dhaka. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
India’s Bangladesh leverage after 2009 was tied to Sheikh Hasina; her 2024 exit opened space for China. Beijing’s BRI projects, credit and defence courtship give Dhaka an omni-enmeshment option. Indian delays on Teesta, a trade surplus and political optics of patronage stored grievances. The shift weakens Delhi’s privileged access but does not erase geography, power trade or transit. A less personality-based Neighbourhood First is the repair, not a hyper-realist sulk.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
Nehruvianism meant NAM, UN moralism and refusal of blocs; neoliberalism in this debate means markets, U.S. partnership and globalisation. 1991, Act East, the U.S. nuclear bargain and the Quad are the visible transition. India still refuses formal alliance, keeps Russia, defends WTO policy space and talks Global South — Nehruvian residues. Concur partly: instruments have shifted; doctrine of autonomy has not been abolished. Multi-alignment is the mix, not a clean replacement of one school by the other.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.