Revision summary
Panchamrit is India’s five-point Glasgow offer. 500 GW non-fossil capacity and 50 per cent non-fossil installed electricity capacity by 2030 are power-system targets. They are not a 50 per cent share of total energy use. Intensity down 45 per cent from 2005, 1 billion tonnes off projected emissions, and net zero 2070 complete the set. Equity and finance claims sat beside the numbers.
Model answer
Introduction
At Glasgow in November 2021 India presented five nectar elements, Panchamrit, as its climate offer. They are capacity, intensity, an absolute cut in projected emissions, and a long net-zero date. They are not a pledge that half of all energy use will be renewable overnight.
Body
The five proposals
- Raise non-fossil electricity capacity to 500 GW by 2030.
- Meet 50 per cent of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil sources by 2030. This is a capacity share, not a claim that half of total energy consumption is already green.
- Reduce the emissions intensity of GDP by 45 per cent by 2030 from the 2005 level.
- Reduce projected carbon emissions by 1 billion tonnes in the decade to 2030.
- Achieve net-zero emissions by 2070.
How to read them
- The 50 per cent line is about the power system’s installed mix, mainly non-fossil generation capacity. It is not 50 per cent of the entire energy mix of oil, gas, biomass, and heat.
- 2070 is later than many OECD net-zero dates. India argued equity and remaining carbon space.
- The package updated earlier NDCs toward non-fossil capacity and a steeper intensity cut.
Diplomacy
- Panchamrit sat beside calls for climate finance and technology from historical emitters. Ambition was paired with CBDR.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Panchamrit COP-26] --> A[500 GW non-fossil] P --> B[50 percent installed capacity non-fossil] P --> C[45 percent intensity cut] P --> D[1 Gt projected cut] P --> E[Net zero 2070]
Conclusion
India’s COP-26 five points are 500 GW non-fossil, half of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil by 2030, a 45 per cent intensity cut from 2005, a 1 billion tonne reduction in projected emissions, and net zero in 2070. Wording them as “half the energy mix” is a factual error.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain the philosophical foundations of India's foreign policy.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q5(b)). View answer →
-
Did India promise that half of all energy would be renewable by 2030?
No. The operational target is about non-fossil installed electricity capacity, plus 500 GW of such capacity.
-
What is the 1 billion tonne figure?
A cut in total projected carbon emissions by 2030, the fourth Panchamrit element, often cited with the intensity and capacity goals.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment. -
2022 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India's foreign policy in the post-cold war period -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India's foreign policy choices? -
2022 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss India's vision of a New World order in the 21st century -
2021 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the philosophical foundations of India's foreign policy. -
2021 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain India's position on the waiver of intellectual property rights on COVID-19 vaccines in WTO. -
2021 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
More from this topic
Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
A multipolar world is several great-power centres; it is hollow for India if Asia is Sino-centric. India’s threats, trade and waters are Asian, so Asian power-sharing is the real test of the slogan. Japan, ASEAN centrality, Korea, Australia and India beside China and the U.S. are the intended map. Quad and FOIP are instruments of pluralism, not a finished concert. The claim is right as strategy and still aspirational as fact.
Q5(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
China's growing footprint and a tangible shift in power dynamics in Bangladesh has weakened India's leverage in Dhaka. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
India’s Bangladesh leverage after 2009 was tied to Sheikh Hasina; her 2024 exit opened space for China. Beijing’s BRI projects, credit and defence courtship give Dhaka an omni-enmeshment option. Indian delays on Teesta, a trade surplus and political optics of patronage stored grievances. The shift weakens Delhi’s privileged access but does not erase geography, power trade or transit. A less personality-based Neighbourhood First is the repair, not a hyper-realist sulk.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
Nehruvianism meant NAM, UN moralism and refusal of blocs; neoliberalism in this debate means markets, U.S. partnership and globalisation. 1991, Act East, the U.S. nuclear bargain and the Quad are the visible transition. India still refuses formal alliance, keeps Russia, defends WTO policy space and talks Global South — Nehruvian residues. Concur partly: instruments have shifted; doctrine of autonomy has not been abolished. Multi-alignment is the mix, not a clean replacement of one school by the other.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.