Revision summary
India and South Africa tabled a COVID TRIPS waiver in 2020. The claim was that patents blocked scaled production of vaccines and treatments. Doha public-health language was the legal-moral precedent. Compulsory licensing was judged too cumbersome for a global shock. Rich-country resistance narrowed the outcome; the Indian position stayed pro-waiver.
Model answer
Introduction
In October 2020 India and South Africa asked the WTO TRIPS Council to waive certain intellectual-property rules on COVID-19 vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics. India’s position was that patents were blocking scale in a pandemic.
Body
The demand
- A time-limited waiver of TRIPS obligations on patents, designs, and undisclosed information for COVID health products.
- Compulsory licensing under existing TRIPS was called too slow and too narrow when many countries needed to produce at once.
- The aim was technology transfer and generic manufacture, not a permanent abolition of IP.
India’s argument
- Public health emergency overrides ordinary rent from patents, in the spirit of Doha 2001 on TRIPS and public health.
- Vaccine nationalism and advanced-country buying left the Global South short.
- India as a pharmacy of the South claimed both capacity and a duty to supply.
The politics of the file
- Many developed members resisted a broad waiver. The United States later backed a narrower vaccine-focused discussion.
- A 2022 Ministerial compromise was thinner than the original India–South Africa text. The 2021 question is the demand, not that later deal.
Link to IR
- The episode is Cox-style: whose property regime a global institution serves in a crisis.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD IS[India South Africa 2020] --> W[TRIPS waiver proposal] W --> V[Vaccines diagnostics therapeutics] R[IP holders rich members] --> O[Opposition delay] W --> O
Conclusion
India, with South Africa, sought a TRIPS waiver so that COVID vaccines and related tools could be produced widely. The position treated IP as a barrier in a pandemic, not as an untouchable right. WTO consensus made the original wide waiver hard to land.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Write about the growing significance of QUAD.
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Did India want to abolish pharmaceutical patents?
No. The proposal was a time-bound pandemic waiver for specified COVID products.
-
Was COVAX India’s substitute for a waiver?
India supported supply initiatives and still argued that IP rules constrained manufacturing capacity.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment. -
2022 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India's foreign policy in the post-cold war period -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India's foreign policy choices? -
2022 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss India's vision of a New World order in the 21st century -
2021 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the five proposals made by India in the recent COP-26 conference held in Glasgow. -
2021 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the philosophical foundations of India's foreign policy. -
2021 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics.
Comparative Politics
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.