Revision summary
Quad is Australia, India, Japan, and the United States. Revival after 2017 and leaders’ meetings in 2021 raised its weight. It aggregates maritime capability without a mutual-defence treaty. Vaccines and technology are the public-goods face. India uses it as a hedge, not as an alliance label.
Model answer
Introduction
The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue joins Australia, India, Japan, and the United States. Its significance grew when leaders met in 2021 and when China loomed larger in the Indo-Pacific. It is a consultative minilateral, not a treaty alliance.
Body
Growth of significance
- Shinzo Abe’s 2007 idea faded after Australia’s pullback. 2017 revived the officials’ track after Doklam-era China anxiety.
- The 2021 leaders’ summits, including a virtual meeting and a later in-person one, raised the political level.
- Vaccines, climate, critical technology, and maritime domain awareness widened the menu beyond naval signalling.
Why it matters
- It is the most visible balancing coalition India will join without calling it an alliance.
- It links Act East to US and Japanese capability in Waltzian terms: capability aggregation under anarchy.
- For ASEAN it is a test: will Quad respect centrality or split the region?
Limits
- No Article 5. India still buys Russian arms and talks strategic autonomy.
- Significance is political and maritime, not a NATO in Asia.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD Q[Quad AU IN JP US] --> L[Leaders 2021] Q --> M[Maritime China hedge] Q --> P[Vaccines tech climate] L --> S[Growing significance] M --> S P --> S
Conclusion
The Quad’s growing significance is leader-level habit, a China-related Indo-Pacific balance, and a public-goods cover. It matters because India is in it. It is not a military pact.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is the Quad aimed only at China?
China is the structural reason it revived. Official texts stress a free Indo-Pacific and public goods.
-
Does Quad bind India to US wars?
No treaty does. Political expectation is the real pressure, which New Delhi still bargains.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics. -
2021 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"The post-colonial state was thought of an entity that stood outside and above society as an autonomous agency." Explain -
2021 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the emergence of neo-realism and its basic tenets -
2021 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the impact of electoral systems and cleavages in shaping party systems with reference to developing countries -
2021 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What is globalisation? Why is there an intense debate about globalisation and its consequences? -
2021 · Q4(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
The modernization thesis asserts that affluence breeds stable democracy. How do you explain the success of India being the world's largest democracy as an exceptional case? -
2021 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the success of ASEAN as a regional organisation -
2021 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Write a brief analysis of the ethnic conflicts and cross-border migrations along India-Myanmar and India-Bangladesh borders
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics.
Comparative Politics
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.