Revision summary
The 74th Amendment inserted Part IXA and the Twelfth Schedule of eighteen municipal functions. It requires regular elections, reservations including for women, a State Finance Commission, and district and metropolitan planning committees. Devolution of functions, funds, and functionaries remains a State choice, so parastatals and commissioners often still run the city. Constitutional status of municipalities is achieved; self-government in daily urban services is not. The Act is therefore a partially fulfilled design: constitutional status exists, and a completed third tier of functions and funds does not.
Model answer
Introduction
The Constitution (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992, inserted Part IXA and made municipalities a third tier of government. The major provisions are institutional: elections, functions, finance commissions, and district planning. Whether the Act is an unfulfilled dream depends on whether States actually transferred functions, funds, and functionaries listed in the Twelfth Schedule.
Body
Major provisions
- Part IXA (Articles 243P to 243ZG) defines municipalities: Nagar Panchayat, Municipal Council, and Municipal Corporation, according to the size and nature of the urban area.
- Regular elections under a State Election Commission, a five-year term, and a bar on prolonged supersession are meant to end administrator rule as the normal form.
- Article 243T reserves seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in proportion to population, and not less than one-third of seats (including offices of chairpersons, as the State provides) for women.
- Article 243W read with the Twelfth Schedule lists eighteen functions that the State legislature may endow, including urban planning, land use, water, public health, fire services, and slum improvement.
- Articles 243X and 243Y provide for municipal taxes, duties, tolls and fees, and for a State Finance Commission to review the financial position of municipalities.
- Article 243ZD and 243ZE create District Planning Committees and Metropolitan Planning Committees to integrate rural and urban plans.
- Article 243ZG bars courts from interfering in electoral matters except by election petition, on the model of panchayat elections.
The unfulfilled-dream argument
- The Amendment is a framework. Devolution of the Twelfth Schedule is left to State legislatures, so parastatal development authorities, water boards, and State-appointed commissioners still hold the functions the Schedule names.
- Property-tax ceilings, delayed State Finance Commission awards, and poor own-revenue keep municipalities grant-dependent.
- Mayor–commissioner splits, delayed elections, and nominated local bodies in practice contradict the five-year elected term.
- District Planning Committees often exist on paper, which empties the spatial-planning promise of Article 243ZD.
- Granville Austin’s social-revolution strand of the Constitution is incomplete in cities if elected councils cannot run water, planning, and housing.
The contrary case, and a judgment
- The dream is not empty: reserved women councillors, State Election Commissions, and the legal duty to constitute municipalities are real.
- The 74th Amendment created a justiciable expectation of local democracy that did not exist as higher law before 1993.
- Dahl’s polyarchy at the municipal scale still requires contestation plus capacity; India built the first more than the second.
- The accurate judgment is that the Act is a partially fulfilled design: constitutional status is achieved, functional and financial self-government is not.
- Fulfilment now depends on State conformity laws that transfer the Schedule, fix a powerful elected executive, and publish devolution data, not on another Union slogan.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[74th Amendment] --> P[Part IXA municipalities] A --> T[Twelfth Schedule] A --> F[SFC and SEC] A --> D[DPC and MPC] T --> U[Unfulfilled: parastatals and funds]
Conclusion
The 74th Amendment’s major provisions are Part IXA, the Twelfth Schedule, reserved councils, State Finance and Election Commissions, and district and metropolitan planning. It remains an unfulfilled dream in functions and funds, and a fulfilled one in constitutional status. The remaining work is State devolution, not the absence of a text.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How does NITI Aayog as a 'policy think tank with shared vision' visualize the reorganization of planning in India? Justify your answer
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Can the Union force a State to transfer water and planning to the corporation?
Not by a simple executive order. Article 243W leaves endowment to the State legislature. The Union can set schemes and conditions, not rewrite the municipal list.
-
Is the 74th Amendment useless without funds?
Without funds it cannot deliver services. It is still not useless: it makes delayed elections and missing SFCs a constitutional failure, not only a political complaint.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the constitutional provisions and nature of advisory jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India. Evaluate your answer with relevant examples -
2025 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
The recent developments in Indian Politics has not eroded the true spirit of federalism in India. Critically examine this statement with the help of appropriate illustrations -
2023 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
The rise of caste politics is to be attributed to both regional aspirations and electoral manifestations. Comment -
2022 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the composition and functions of the Inter-State Council. To what extent has this body been successful in achieving its objectives? -
2021 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Explain the Aristotelian view of politics. To what extent do you think it has contributed to the development of modern-day constitutional democracies?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Normative approach in Political Science.
Political Theory
The normative approach asks what political life ought to be and argues about justice, liberty, and obligation. Plato, Aristotle, the contract theorists, Mill, and Rawls are central practitioners. Easton and Dahl supply empirical maps of systems and decisions that cannot replace the question of right. Communitarian critics warn that abstract persons can hide real communities. Indian Parts III and IV show that a constitution is itself a public set of ought-statements.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Multicultural perspective on rights.
Political Theory
Multicultural theory treats culture as a condition of using liberty, not as a private hobby. Kymlicka, Taylor, Parekh, and Walzer argue for recognition and, in some cases, group rights. Indian Articles 25 to 30 and linguistic states are the constitutional form of that argument. Ambedkar’s Article 17 and sex-equality limits block a group veto over civil liberty. The perspective fails if it either ignores minorities or traps persons inside the group.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
State of Nature as State of War (Hobbes).
Political Theory
Hobbes’s state of nature is a state of war: a condition of known readiness to fight where there is no common power. Competition, diffidence, and glory are the three causes of quarrel. Natural equality of vulnerability makes pre-emptive violence rational. The sovereign ends the war by monopolising judgment and force. Locke, Mill, and constitutional democracy keep a common power and then limit it, which Hobbes refused as a right against the sovereign.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.