Q17 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2024 · GS II · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q16 Q18 →

In a crucial domain like the public healthcare system, the Indian State should play a vital role to contain the adverse impact of marketization of the system. Suggest some measures through which the State can enhance the reach of public healthcare at the grassroots level.

Topic: Health, Education and Human Resources. Syllabus: Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector / Services relating to Health, Education, Human Resources. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Health, Education and Human Resources.

Revision summary

Private-heavy care and out-of-pocket spend are the face of marketization in Indian health. Information asymmetry and cream-skimming make a pure market unsafe for the poor. Grassroots State role: Health and Wellness Centres, ASHA and ANM, district hospitals, public colleges, pooled drugs, ambulances. Insurance purchases care; it does not replace a public provider that sets a price floor. Article 47 and Article 21 emergency-care cases already treat basic health as a State duty. Capex on buildings is not enough; people who stay and drugs that exist are the reach.

Model answer

Introduction

India’s sick still pay out of pocket more than a republic should ask. Private beds and labs grew because the public core was thin, not because the market is a clinic of last resort. Marketization without a strong State means cream-skimming: paying patients inside, the poor outside or indebted. In healthcare the State is not a referee on the touchline. It is the team that must still play.

Body

Adverse impact of marketization

A free market in stents is a seller’s market.

  • Peg: Private share of outpatient and inpatient care is high; catastrophic spend still pushes households below the line.
  • Peg: Information asymmetry means the patient cannot shop for a procedure the way she shops for soap.
  • Peg: Rural posts stay vacant while urban corporate hospitals cluster; clinical-establishment regulation is patchy.
  • Peg: Insurance without public provision can inflate prices if the public hospital is too weak to be a price anchor.

Why the State must play

Article 47 and Article 21 already said the quiet part.

  • Peg: Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity and Parmanand Katara treat timely emergency care as a State duty under Article 21.
  • Peg: The grassroots right to a nurse, a drug and a referral is not a tradable.
  • Peg: Market players can remain for electives; they cannot be the only competent bed in a district.

Grassroots measures

Provision first, purchase second.

  • Peg: Fill Health and Wellness Centres with diagnostics and drugs that do not require a private shop; pay ASHAs as the real primary-care network.
  • Peg: Mid-level providers, served rural bonds, specialists at district hospitals, and public medical colleges attached to those hospitals expand seats and beds together.
  • Peg: Immunisation, tuberculosis, vector control, mental health at the primary centre, ambulance grids, Jan Aushadhi and pooled procurement on the Tamil Nadu Medical Services model.
  • Peg: Enforce clinical-establishment standards; audit insurance claims; steer volume to public facilities that are made fit — insurance as a servant of provision, not a substitute.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  M[Marketization] --> O[OOP cream-skim]
  ST[State] --> HWC[HWC drugs ASHA]
  ST --> DH[District hospital]
  ST --> R[Regulate private]
  HWC --> E[Equity at grassroots]
  DH --> E

Conclusion

Marketization without a public core prices the poor out and inflates the bill. The State enhances grassroots reach by staffing wellness centres and district hospitals, buying drugs in bulk, regulating private excess, and using insurance as a servant of provision — not a substitute.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q11 · GS II · 15 marks

    What are the aims and objects of recently passed and enforced, The Public Examination (prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024? Whether University/State Education Board examinations, too, are covered under the Act?

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks

    The crucial aspect of development process has been the inadequate attention paid to Human Resource Development in India. Suggest measures that can address this adequacy.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q18 · GS II · 15 marks

    Skill development programs have succeed in increasing human resources supply to various sectors. In the context of the statement analyze the linkages between education, skill and employment.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q18 · GS II · 15 marks

    The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 remains inadequate in promoting incentive-based system for children's education without generating awareness about the importance of schooling. Analyse.

    View answer →

  5. 2021 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks

    "Besides being a moral imperative of Welfare State, primary health structure is a necessary pre-condition for sustainable development." Analyze.

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q7 · GS II · 10 marks

    "'Earn while you learn' scheme needs to be strengthened to make vocational education and skill training meaningful." Comment.

    View answer →

  7. 2021 · Q17 · GS II · 15 marks

    "Though women in post-Independent India have excelled in various fields, the social attitude towards women and feminist movement has been patriarchal." Apart from women education and women empowerment schemes, what interventions can help change this milieu?

    View answer →

  8. 2020 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks

    In order to enhance the prospects of social development, sound and adequate health care policies are needed particularly in the fields of geriatric and maternal health care. Discuss.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks

Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees, with particular reference to "one nation - one election" principle.

Indian Constitution

Tarkunde, Goswami, Law Commission 170/255 and the Election Commission have long asked for ceilings on party spend, faster petitions, and inner-party democracy. Candidate spend is capped; party spend is not, which is why money still dominates the poll. ADR disclosure and Lily Thomas reduced opacity and the conviction cushion; they did not end criminalisation. ONOE, as framed by the Kovind committee, promises one Model Code freeze, lower cost and less policy freeze. Federal cost: truncated Assemblies, President’s Rule risk, and nationalisation of State polls. Simultaneity is not a substitute for audited party finance and a statutory Code. Reform that works is a package, not a single polling date.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks

Explain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals. Whether they entertain civil as well as criminal cases?

Separation of Powers

Lok Adalat is a Legal Services Authorities Act forum: conciliation, award as a decree, generally no appeal. It hears civil matters and compoundable criminal cases, not non-compoundable crime. Arbitration is contractual under the 1996 Act: civil-commercial disputes, Section 34 challenge, no criminal trial. Booz Allen and Vidya Drolia mark what cannot be sent to a private tribunal. Permanent Lok Adalats for public utilities are a statutory hybrid, still not private arbitration. The working distinction is public compromise at little cost versus paid private adjudication.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks

"The growth of cabinet system has practkally resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy." Elucidate.

Parliament and State Legislatures

Articles 74–75 keep the Cabinet responsible to the Lok Sabha; that is the legal core of parliamentary government. Whips and the Tenth Schedule, ordinances and money-bill classification have moved real initiation to the Cabinet. This is practical marginalisation of the floor, not a legal repeal of Parliament. PAC, standing committees, Rajya Sabha and the floor test still bite. Keisham Meghachandra pressed Speakers to decide disqualification on a clock. A narrower anti-defection law would restore some of the supremacy the quote says is lost. The examiner’s misspelling does not change the demand: show practice squeezing text, not text dying.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.