Q18 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2024 · GS II · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q17 Q19 →

e-governance is not just about the routine application of digital technology in service delivery process. It is as much about multifarious interactions for ensuring transparency and accountability. In this context, evaluate the role of the 'Interactive Service Model' of e-governance.

Topic: Transparency and e-Governance. Syllabus: Important aspects of governance, transparency and accountability, e-governance — applications, models, successes, limitations, and potential; citizens charters, transparency and accountability and institutional and other measures. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Transparency and e-Governance.

Revision summary

E-governance is not only digitising a counter; it is multi-way interaction for transparency and accountability. The Interactive Service Model is two-way apply–track–grieve–reply, the top of the usual model ladder. Indian examples: UMANG, CPGRAMS, Passport Seva, RTI Online, GST replies, GeM. Gains: time-stamped trails. Losses: digital divide, kiosk touts, privacy risk, vanity dashboards. Assisted access and honest back-ends decide whether the model is real. Direct Benefit Transfer is interactive only when failure can be queried.

Model answer

Introduction

Putting a form on a website is digitisation. E-governance, in the line of United Nations and Indian administrative writing, is also who can speak back. The Interactive Service Model is the end of that ladder: the State and the citizen transact and query each other, not only download a PDF. Transparency and accountability live or die in that loop.

Body

More than routine technology

A portal is not a republic.

  • Peg: Back-end integration can be excellent and still opaque to the user.
  • Peg: Multifarious interactions mean government-to-citizen, government-to-business, government-to-government and citizen-to-government — grievance, consultation, tracking, and the right to see one’s own file.

The Interactive Service Model

Typologies used in Indian administrative teaching climb from broadcast to two-way service.

  • Peg: A broadcasting model only pushes information; a critical-flow model sends selected data; comparative analysis and e-advocacy sit in between.
  • Peg: The interactive service model is two-way: the citizen applies, pays, tracks, rates and appeals, and the department’s clock is visible on the same screen.
  • Peg: Indian pieces of that loop include UMANG, CPGRAMS, RTI Online, Passport Seva SMS, e-District, Government e-Marketplace and GST notices that can be answered online.
  • Peg: Direct Benefit Transfer is interactive only when a failed payment can be queried and corrected, not when money is merely pushed.

Evaluation

A visible queue is more transparent than a peon’s memory; a fake dashboard is not.

  • Peg: A time-stamped grievance identity is evidence a newspaper or a court can use — accountability as a trail.
  • Peg: Passport, railway tickets and pension correction work where the loop actually closes.
  • Peg: Limits: low-literacy and remote households need assisted kiosks, or a new tout appears; green dashboards can hide a shut field office; after Puttaswamy a State that logs every click carries a privacy duty; an algorithm that rejects a scheme can still be hidden.
  • Peg: The model is the right aspiration; it works when the back-end is honest and the front-end is assisted. Technology without that loop is only routine application.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  B[Broadcast PDF] --> I[Interactive service]
  I --> T[Track pay appeal]
  T --> A[Accountability]
  D[Divide dashboard] --> X[Broken loop]
  I --> D
  T --> P[Privacy duty]

Conclusion

  • E-governance as interaction is the Interactive Service Model: two-way transactions with a visible clock. It can discipline the file. It fails when the divide, the tout and the fake dashboard take the citizen’s place in the loop.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q7 · GS II · 10 marks

    e-governance projects have a built-in bias towards technology and back-end integration than user-centric designs. Examine.

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q16 · GS II · 15 marks

    The Citizens' charter has been a landmark initiative in ensuring citizen-centric administration. But it is yet to reach its full potential. Identify the factors hindering the realisation of its promise and suggest measures to overcome them.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks

    E-governance, as a critical tool of governance, has ushered in effectiveness, transparency and accountability in governments. What inadequacies hamper the enhancement of these features?

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks

    "Right of movement and residence throughout the territory of India are freely available to the Indian citizens, but these rights are not absolute. " Comment.

    View answer →

  5. 2020 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks

    "The emergence of Fourth Industrial Revolution (Digital Revolution) has initiated e-Governance as an integral part of government". Discuss.

    View answer →

  6. 2018 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks

    E-governance in not only about utilization of the power of new technology, but also much about critical importance of the 'use value' of information. Explain.

    View answer →

  7. 2018 · Q18 · GS II · 15 marks

    The Citizen's Charter is an ideal instrument of organisational transparency and accountability, but it has its own limitations. Identify the limitations and suggest measures for greater effectiveness of the Citizen's Charters. (15).

    View answer →

  8. 2017 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks

    Discuss the role of Public Accounts Committee in establishing accountability of the government to the people.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks

Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees, with particular reference to "one nation - one election" principle.

Indian Constitution

Tarkunde, Goswami, Law Commission 170/255 and the Election Commission have long asked for ceilings on party spend, faster petitions, and inner-party democracy. Candidate spend is capped; party spend is not, which is why money still dominates the poll. ADR disclosure and Lily Thomas reduced opacity and the conviction cushion; they did not end criminalisation. ONOE, as framed by the Kovind committee, promises one Model Code freeze, lower cost and less policy freeze. Federal cost: truncated Assemblies, President’s Rule risk, and nationalisation of State polls. Simultaneity is not a substitute for audited party finance and a statutory Code. Reform that works is a package, not a single polling date.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks

Explain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals. Whether they entertain civil as well as criminal cases?

Separation of Powers

Lok Adalat is a Legal Services Authorities Act forum: conciliation, award as a decree, generally no appeal. It hears civil matters and compoundable criminal cases, not non-compoundable crime. Arbitration is contractual under the 1996 Act: civil-commercial disputes, Section 34 challenge, no criminal trial. Booz Allen and Vidya Drolia mark what cannot be sent to a private tribunal. Permanent Lok Adalats for public utilities are a statutory hybrid, still not private arbitration. The working distinction is public compromise at little cost versus paid private adjudication.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks

"The growth of cabinet system has practkally resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy." Elucidate.

Parliament and State Legislatures

Articles 74–75 keep the Cabinet responsible to the Lok Sabha; that is the legal core of parliamentary government. Whips and the Tenth Schedule, ordinances and money-bill classification have moved real initiation to the Cabinet. This is practical marginalisation of the floor, not a legal repeal of Parliament. PAC, standing committees, Rajya Sabha and the floor test still bite. Keisham Meghachandra pressed Speakers to decide disqualification on a clock. A narrower anti-defection law would restore some of the supremacy the quote says is lost. The examiner’s misspelling does not change the demand: show practice squeezing text, not text dying.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.