Revision summary
The 14th Finance Commission raised States’ share in the divisible pool from 32 to 42 per cent for 2015–20. Untied devolution, not only CSS, let States fund their own priorities and borrow on a more predictable base. Horizontal criteria helped poorer and forested States; revenue-deficit grants closed residual gaps. Local-body and disaster grants reduced raids on State revenue for third-tier and calamity costs. Cesses outside the pool and later GST shocks limited the gain; the 15th FC kept devolution near that high watermark at 41 per cent.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
- The Fourteenth Finance Commission (Chair: Y.V. Reddy; award period 2015–20) raised States’ share in the divisible pool of Union taxes to 42 per cent from 32 per cent. That single change, plus a cleaner grant design, gave States more untied money with which to repair their own fiscal position.
Body
The 42 per cent devolution
- Vertical devolution of 42 per cent was a structural jump, not a routine tweak; it moved a large block of resources from Union discretion to a formula share under Article 280.
- Untied tax devolution lets a State fund salaries, health, irrigation, or debt service according to its Assembly’s priorities, which specific-purpose Centrally Sponsored Schemes never fully allowed.
- Horizontal shares used income distance, population, area, forest cover and demographic change, which helped poorer and forested States more than a pure equal-cut would have.
Grants and fiscal space
- The Commission recommended grants to local bodies and a disaster-relief architecture, which reduced the need for States to raid their own revenue for constitutionally mandated third-tier and calamity spending.
- It asked for a sharper distinction between tax devolution and grants, and for fewer overlapping CSS conditions, so State budgets were less a Union annex.
- Revenue-deficit grants for selected States were meant to close residual gaps after the 42 per cent formula, which is how fiscally weaker States were enabled without diluting the formula for all.
How the fiscal position actually improved — and the caveats
- Higher predictable devolution improved the States’ bargaining power in GST-era compensation debates and in market borrowing plans under Article 293, because a larger own-share is better collateral than an uncertain scheme release.
- Several States could raise capital outlay and still keep FRBM paths in the early award years, which is the practical meaning of an improved fiscal position.
- Caveat: oil cesses and other non-divisible levies shrank the divisible pool in practice; GST implementation and later shocks (2016–20) meant the 42 per cent was necessary but not sufficient.
- Recommendation: protect the divisible pool from excessive cesses, which is the 15th Finance Commission’s continuing worry after it set devolution at 41 per cent to make room for the new Union Territories.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD F[14th FC Art 280] --> V[42 percent tax devolution] F --> G[Local body and disaster grants] V --> U[Untied State fiscal space] G[G] --> U[U] U --> P[Improved State fiscal position]
Conclusion
The Fourteenth Finance Commission enabled States mainly by the 42 per cent untied devolution, cleaner local-body and disaster grants, and a smaller shadow of CSS conditions. Fiscal positions improved where States used that predictability for own-priority spending and borrowing; cesses and later shocks show that devolution is the floor, not the whole house.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Pressure groups play a vital role in influencing public policy making in India." Explain how the business associations contribute to public policies.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q5). View answer →
-
Did 42 per cent automatically cut the Union’s role in State subjects?
It reduced Union leverage through tied schemes, but CSS and cesses continued. Devolution changed the mix; it did not end cooperative-federal bargaining.
-
Why did the 15th FC drop the share to 41 per cent?
Mainly to keep the States’ envelope whole after Jammu and Kashmir became Union Territories, not as a reversal of the 14th FC philosophy.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
More from this topic
Q15 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS II · 15 marks · Solution
To what extent do pressure groups, social movements and corporate lobbies deepen pluralistic democracy in India by representing excluded interests? Analyse whether the growing convergence of corporate wealth and political power poses a threat to the autonomy of formal democratic institutions.
Governance and Policy
• Civil society groups and grassroots movements go beyond periodic elections to channel marginalized voices into policy spaces. • Social movements on tribal rights and environmental protection have successfully forced the state to create protective legislation. • Representation is uneven due to a severe resource asymmetry between well-funded corporate lobbies and unorganized labor. • Some interest groups act as elite fronts, subverting public welfare for narrow sectarian gains. • Corporate financial dominance through opaque funding creates severe risks of policy capture and quid pro quo corruption. • Strengthening transparency in political funding and reinforcing regulatory autonomy are essential to safeguard democratic governance.
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS II · 15 marks · Solution
What is meant by judicial legislation? In this context, discuss the verdicts of the apex court allowing "passive euthanasia" and a "living will".
Governance and Policy
• Judicial legislation occurs when courts create binding rules to fill policy voids caused by legislative inaction. • The Supreme Court legalized passive euthanasia under Article 21, recognizing the right to die with dignity. • The *Common Cause* (2018) judgment permitted the withdrawal of life support for terminally ill patients with strict medical safeguards. • A living will is an advanced medical directive allowing individuals to pre-state their treatment preferences before incapacitation. • The Supreme Court simplified living will procedures in 2023, replacing complex magistrate approvals with basic notary attestation. • While court guidelines provide immediate relief, they underscore the need for a comprehensive parliamentary statute on end-of-life care. • Codifying these judicial norms through formal legislation ensures democratic legitimacy, ethical debate, and administrative clarity.
Q6 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS II · 10 marks · Solution
Does India's tribal development policy reflect the aspirations for a socially grounded and equity-based governance? Justify your answer.
Governance and Policy
• India's tribal policy balances constitutional protections with socio-economic development goals. • Fifth and Sixth Schedules provide decentralized autonomy and safeguard tribal lands. • Articles 275(1) and 335 ensure grants-in-aid and reservations to bridge gaps. • PESA (1996) and FRA (2006) mark shifts toward rights-based and culturally sensitive governance. • Gram sabhas are empowered over minor forest produce and community forest rights. • Implementation is hindered by forced displacement without consent and bureaucratic inertia. • True equity requires empowering local institutions rather than relying solely on welfare delivery.