Revision summary
The 1935 Act designed an All-India Federation, three legislative lists, provincial autonomy and a Federal Court. Those are federal constitutional features and they later shaped the 1950 text. The federation of princely States never started, so the scheme stayed on paper. Governor-General and Governor special powers, and the absence of fundamental rights, kept a colonial unitary core. The Act therefore laid down a federal constitution in form, not a fully operative federation.
Model answer
Introduction
The Government of India Act, 1935, was the longest British statute for India and the first to draw an All-India Federation with three lists, provincial autonomy, and a Federal Court. On paper it laid down a federal constitution. In operation the federation of princely States never commenced, and the Governor-General’s special powers kept a strong unitary core. The honest answer is therefore a qualified yes: federal in design, not a working federation of the 1950 kind.
Body
Federal features on paper
- The Act proposed a federation of Governors’ Provinces and acceding Indian States, with a Federal Legislature and a Federal Executive, which is the classic federal idea of dual polities under a common centre.
- It distributed powers through a Federal List, a Provincial List and a Concurrent List, the direct ancestor of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India.
- Provincial autonomy replaced dyarchy in the provinces: popular ministries responsible to elected provincial legislatures ran transferred provincial subjects, which is a federal trait at the unit level.
- A Federal Court was created to decide disputes between units and to interpret the Act, a judicial umpire being a normal federal device.
- Residuary powers were with the Governor-General, and the Instrument of Accession was to define each prince’s federal subjects, which is closer to a treaty federation than to the later Indian model of a created Union.
Why it was not a full federal constitution in fact
- Part II of the Act, the All-India Federation, never came into force because the required number of princely States did not accede; from 1937 to 1947 the Centre remained the 1919-style dyarchy plus the 1935 central chapters, not a federation of States.
- The Governor-General had special responsibilities and discretionary powers over defence, ecclesiastical affairs, external affairs, and tribal areas, and could act against ministerial advice, which is not the federal executive of a dominion with responsible government at the Centre.
- Governors in the provinces had similar special responsibilities and could take over under Section 93, a colonial preview of later Article 356, which kept a unitary override inside “autonomy”.
- There was no bill of fundamental rights against the federal and provincial governments, and sovereignty remained with the British Crown and Parliament, which could still amend or repeal the Act.
- Representation of princes in the federal legislature was to be undemocratic nomination, so even a commenced federation would have mixed autocracy with elected British-India provinces.
Discussion against the 1950 Constitution
- The Constitution of India took the lists, the Federal Court (as the Supreme Court), and provincial autonomy, then added adult suffrage, justiciable rights, and a Union that exists without princely accession.
- Indian federalism is often called quasi-federal because of Articles 3, 248, 254 and 356; the 1935 Act was more quasi-federal still, because the Centre was not even a responsible federal cabinet in the full sense and the federation of States never sat.
- Scholars therefore say the 1935 Act laid down a federal scheme and a federal court, but not a living federal constitution. That distinction answers the question without denying the Act’s influence on 1950.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[GoI Act 1935] --> L[Three lists and provincial autonomy] A --> F[All-India Federation plan] F --> P[Princes did not accede] P --> U[Federation never commenced] A --> G[GG special powers] G --> U
Conclusion
- The Government of India Act, 1935, did lay down a federal constitution on paper: three lists, provincial autonomy, a Federal Court, and a planned All-India Federation. It did not become a working federation, because the princes did not join and the Governor-General retained a unitary, colonial core. It was a federal blueprint under the Crown, not a completed federal republic.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The concept of cooperative federalism has been increasingly emphasised in recent years. Highlight the drawbacks in the existing structure and extent to which cooperative federalism would answer the shortcomings.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q2). View answer →
-
Did provincial ministries under the 1935 Act mean India was already a federation?
They meant provincial autonomy inside British India. The All-India Federation with the princes never came into force, so the Centre was not a federal government of acceding units.
-
Is the 1950 Constitution just the 1935 Act with a Preamble?
No. It borrowed lists, courts and autonomy, then added popular sovereignty, fundamental rights, adult suffrage and a Union that does not depend on princely accession.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
Examine the evolving pattern of Centre-State financial relations in the context of planned development in India. How far have the recent reforms impacted the fiscal federalism in India? -
2024 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
What changes has the Union Government recently introduced in the domain of Centre-State relations? Suggest measures to be adopted to build the trust between the Centre and the States and for strengthening federalism. -
2023 · Q15 · GS II · 15 marks
Explain the significance of the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act. To what extent does it reflect the accommodative spirit of federalism? -
2021 · Q11 · GS II · 15 marks
The jurisdiction of the Central Bureau of Investigation(CBI) regarding lodging an FIR and conducting probe within a particular state is being questioned by various States. However, the power of States to withhold consent to the CBI is not absolute. Explain with special reference to the federal character of India. -
2019 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
From the resolution of contentious issues regarding distribution of legislative powers by the courts, 'Principle of Federal Supremacy' and 'Harmonious Construction' have emerged. Explain. -
2016 · Q1 · GS II · 12 marks
Discuss the essentials of the 69th Constitutional Amendment Act and anomalies, if any, that have led to recent reported conflicts between the elected representatives and the institution of the Lieutenant Governor in the administration of Delhi. Do you think that this will give rise to a new trend in the functioning of the Indian federal politics? -
2015 · Q2 · GS II · 12 marks
The concept of cooperative federalism has been increasingly emphasised in recent years. Highlight the drawbacks in the existing structure and extent to which cooperative federalism would answer the shortcomings. -
2015 · Q4 · GS II · 12 marks
Khap panchayats have been in the news for functioning as extra - constitutional authorities, often delivering pronouncements amounting to human right violations. Discuss critically the actions taken by the legislative, executive and judiciary to set the things right in this regard.
More from this topic
Q14 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
Examine the evolving pattern of Centre-State financial relations in the context of planned development in India. How far have the recent reforms impacted the fiscal federalism in India?
Federal Structure and Devolution
Finance Commissions devolve taxes; Planning Commission Plan grants created a discretionary second channel. Sarkaria and Punchhi criticised that discretion. NITI Aayog ended Plan cheques; 14th FC raised the States’ share of the divisible pool to 42%. GST shares tax but limits State rate power; cesses outside the pool and CSS keep Union leverage. Article 293 borrowing conditions remain a hard federal tool.
Q13 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 15 marks
What changes has the Union Government recently introduced in the domain of Centre-State relations? Suggest measures to be adopted to build the trust between the Centre and the States and for strengthening federalism.
Federal Structure and Devolution
Recent Centre–State shifts: GST compensation end, cess and surcharge, centrally sponsored schemes, NITI replacing plan bargaining, Governor delays on Bills, Article 370, simultaneous-election talk. The Supreme Court in the Punjab Bills case limited pocket-veto use of Articles 200–201. GST Council remains a federal bargain; CBI consent and cadre rules remain sore. Sarkaria and Punchhi asked for an Inter-State Council, consultation, less cess, and a non-partisan Governor. Trust is procedural — calendars, terms of reference, devolution — not a communiqué. Cooperative federalism is minutes and transfers, not a chapter in a brochure.
Q15 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 15 marks
Explain the significance of the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act. To what extent does it reflect the accommodative spirit of federalism?
Federal Structure and Devolution
The 101st Constitutional Amendment, 2016, introduced GST through Articles 246A, 269A and 279A. It subsumed many Union and State indirect taxes into CGST, SGST and IGST. The GST Council gives States two-thirds vote weight and the Union one-third, with a three-fourths decision rule. Five-year compensation was the federal bargain; dual GST kept States as taxing governments. Mohit Minerals held Council recommendations not strictly binding law. Accommodation is real in design and strained in revenue politics after compensation.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.