Revision summary
Terrorism and wars have made distrust the default in India–Pakistan ties. Cricket, films, music, pilgrimage and campaigns such as Aman ki Asha can humanise the other side. Goodwill from sport and culture is real, shallow, and reversed by the next major attack. Soft power is a floor for people-to-people contact, not a substitute for ending cross-border terrorism. Multilateral cricket and humanitarian visas are the most durable practical tools.
Model answer
Introduction
India–Pakistan relations have been shaped by Partition, wars, Kashmir, and repeated terrorist attacks on Indian soil, from the 2001 Parliament attack to 26/11 Mumbai. Official talks freeze when blood is shed; publics learn to expect the freeze. Soft power — cricket, films, music, pilgrimage, literature — still moves ordinary people when the border is shut. It can generate pockets of goodwill. It cannot, by itself, replace a credible end to cross-border terrorism or a political process. The extent of help is real, limited, and easily reversed.
Body
Why distrust is the baseline
- Terrorism with alleged sanctuary or support from Pakistani soil is, for India, not a composite dialogue item but a first condition. Each attack resets the political clock.
- Military crises, ceasefire violations, and media nationalism on both sides punish leaders who look “soft”.
- People-to-people contact is already thin: visas, the Attari–Wagah theatre, and suspended bus and train links after shocks.
- Soft power that ignores this structure will be called naive in Delhi and insufficient in the families of victims.
How sports and culture can still help — with examples
- Cricket: India–Pakistan matches at World Cups and Champions Trophies draw huge shared audiences. The 2004 Indian tour of Pakistan, in a thaw after the 2003 ceasefire, showed stadiums as temporary public diplomacy. Players’ visits and commentary humanise the other side in a way a joint statement does not.
- Hockey, kabaddi and tennis have smaller but similar effects when series are allowed.
- Cinema and television: Hindi films and Pakistani television dramas have crossed the border in both directions in calmer years. Artists (khayal, qawwali, Sufi circuits) share a civilisational grammar that Partition did not fully cut.
- Aman ki Asha (Times of India and Jang group, 2010) was a media-led cultural and dialogue campaign that kept a civilian channel when official talks were brittle.
- Pilgrimage: the Kartarpur corridor idea (later opened in 2019) and older visas for the Nankana Sahib and Ajmer Sharif circuits show religion as a people-to-people route, not only as a conflict fuel.
- Track-two dialogues, writers’ festivals, and alumni of shared universities create elites who can argue for restraint in a crisis — a thin but useful layer.
- Shared disaster response or sports ceasefires (playing on after a tragedy, or using a tournament as cover to resume talks) have occasionally lowered the temperature.
Extent and limits
- Soft power works best as a supplement when violence is down and visas exist. It does not survive a Mumbai-scale attack; films get banned, series get cancelled, and cricketers become symbols, not ambassadors.
- State-controlled narratives can turn a match into a nationalist test. Then sport increases distrust rather than goodwill.
- Goodwill among fans is not policy. The Pakistan Army–civilian balance and non-State groups are not moved by a cover drive.
- Asymmetry: Indian entertainment has a larger market. Cultural flow can feel like one-way influence in Pakistan, which creates its own resentment.
- Useful extent: keep human contact alive, reduce caricature, give both governments a face-saving off-ramp after a pause, and protect pilgrims and students from becoming hostages of every incident.
- Not useful as a substitute for intelligence cooperation, FATF-type pressure, or a clear Indian red line on terrorism.
A realistic mix
- Continue cricket in multilateral events even when bilateral series are politically impossible.
- Keep pilgrimage and medical visas as humanitarian exceptions.
- Do not pretend a concert equals a composite dialogue. Do not, either, empty the relationship of every civilian tie; that only feeds the next generation of distrust.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Terrorism and distrust] --> F[Official freeze] S[Sports cinema pilgrimage] --> G[Pockets of goodwill] G --> E[Easier thaw when violence pauses] T --> R[Bans cancelled series] R --> F P[Policy on terror] --> X[Soft power cannot replace]
Conclusion
Sports and cultural exchange can generate real but perishable goodwill between Indians and Pakistanis, as cricket tours, films, Sufi and Punjabi culture, media campaigns such as Aman ki Asha, and pilgrimage show. The extent of help is limited: terrorism and the security establishments reset the relationship faster than a stadium can rebuild it. Soft power is worth keeping as a people-to-people floor. It is not a foreign-policy ceiling until violence stops being the opening move.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Should India refuse all cricket until terrorism ends?
Bilateral series are a political choice. Multilateral matches still let publics meet without treating sport as a full substitute for security policy.
-
Can Bollywood fix the relationship?
No. Films can soften caricatures in calm years. They are banned or trolled after attacks, which shows culture follows security, not the other way around.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2016 · Q3 · GS II · 12 marks
"The Indian party system is passing through a phase of transition which looks to be full of contradictions and paradoxes." Discuss. -
2016 · Q5 · GS II · 12 marks
Discuss each adjective attached to the word 'Republic' in the 'Preamble'. Are they defendable in the present circumstances? -
2016 · Q8 · GS II · 12 marks
What is quasi judicial body? Explain with the help of concrete examples. -
2016 · Q10 · GS II · 12 marks
"In the Indian governance system, the role of non-state actors has been only marginal." Critically examine this statement. -
2016 · Q11 · GS II · 12 marks
"Effectiveness of the government system at various levels and people's participation in the governance system are inter-dependent" Discuss their relationship in the context of India. -
2015 · Q3 · GS II · 12 marks
In the absence of well - educated and organised local level government system, Panchayats and Samitis have remained mainly political institutions and not effective instrument of governance. Critically Discuss. -
2015 · Q10 · GS II · 12 marks
How can be the role of NGOs be strengthened in India for development works relating to protection of the Environment? Discuss throwing light on the major constraints. -
2015 · Q16 · GS II · 12 marks
For achieving the desired objectives,it is necessary to ensure that the regulatory institutions remain independent and autonomous. Discuss in the light of experiences in recent past.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS II · 12 marks
Discuss the possible factors that inhibit India from enacting for its citizen a uniform civil code as provided for in the Directive Principles of State Policy.
Transparency and e-Governance
Article 44 directs a uniform civil code but Article 37 keeps it unenforceable in court. Hindu Code statutes already unify a large share of family law; Muslim, Christian and Parsi laws remain separate, with a secular option in the Special Marriage Act, 1954. Articles 25 and 26, custom, and tribal practice make a single book of rules politically hard. Shah Bano and the 1986 Act turned personal law into a vote question. Courts can urge a code; only Parliament can enact one after an open, gender-just draft.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS II · 12 marks
The concept of cooperative federalism has been increasingly emphasised in recent years. Highlight the drawbacks in the existing structure and extent to which cooperative federalism would answer the shortcomings.
Federal Structure and Devolution
India’s federal text is Union-heavy: lists, Article 356, All-India Services and tied schemes. Vertical fiscal imbalance and a weak Inter-State Council were core drawbacks of the old structure. NITI Aayog, 42 per cent devolution and a GST Council are the main cooperative answers of recent years. Cooperation eases planning and tax-sharing; it does not rewrite emergency power or the Governor. Forums need money and convention, or cooperative federalism stays a slogan.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS II · 12 marks
In the absence of well - educated and organised local level government system, Panchayats and Samitis have remained mainly political institutions and not effective instrument of governance. Critically Discuss.
Governance and Policy
The 73rd Amendment created panchayats; many still work as patronage and party offices. Low literacy, weak gram sabhas and short training make elected bodies dependent on the bureaucracy. Article 243G and the three Fs are the larger constraint: an educated sarpanch cannot govern a function the State has not given. Finance Commission grants and examples such as Kerala show organisation and money can improve service. Education is necessary; devolution and a local cadre make panchayats governments.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.