Revision summary
Kalelkar listed; Mandal implemented 27 percent with social-educational-economic tests. Indra Sawhney added creamy layer and a 50 percent ceiling. 102nd Amendment constitutionalised NCBC; 105th restored state lists after the Maratha judgment. Rohini tries to sub-categorise Central OBCs; Ram Singh required data for Jat inclusion. Centre and states maintain separate lists; method is gazette politics under judicial review.
Model answer
Introduction
Other Backward Classes are not in the original caste-schedule sense of SC/ST. They are a developmental-political list of socially and educationally backward groups, built by commissions, gazettes and courts. History and method are one story.
Body
National history
Kaka Kalelkar Commission (1953) first listed backward classes for the Union; Nehru’s government did not implement a national quota from it, partly because the list looked like a caste census. Mandal Commission (1979, report 1980, implemented 1990) used social, educational and economic indicators, 1931 census proxies, and arrived at about 52 percent of the population as OBC, recommending 27 percent jobs. Indra Sawhney (1992) upheld 27 percent, barred reservation in promotions for OBCs (as then argued), imposed creamy layer, and set a 50 percent ceiling except in extraordinary situations.
NCBC began as a statutory body (1993) and became constitutional by the 102nd Amendment (2018). Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil (Maratha, 2021) read 102nd as giving the President (Union) the exclusive power to notify SEBCs for the purpose of Article 342A, unsettling state lists. The 105th Amendment (2021) restored states’ power to make their own OBC lists. Rohini Commission (sub-categorisation of Central OBCs) tried to split a lumped list so that a few dominant OBCs do not take most posts; its politics remain unfinished.
Janhit Abhiyan (2022) upheld EWS 10 percent, showing another backwardness track beside OBC.
State methods
States had backward-class commissions and lists before Mandal (Tamil Nadu’s long quota history, Karnataka, Bihar). Methods: public notification, representations, socio-economic surveys, public hearings, and a gazette. Some states use occupation plus caste; some notify Muslim occupational groups as OBC. Quantifiable data after Indra Sawhney and later Ram Singh (Jat, 2015) is the judicial test: a state cannot notify a dominant agrarian caste as OBC on assertion alone.
Inclusion and exclusion petitions go to the state commission, then to the government, then often to the High Court. Central list for Union jobs and UPSC is separate from the state list for state services. A community can be OBC in one and not the other.
What “method” means
It is not anthropometry. It is indicators, politics, gazette and judicial review. Anthropology’s caste ethnography (dominant caste, Sanskritisation) explains why some powerful jatis still reach the list. The honest method would be a caste census with deprivation scores and sub-quotas. India has pieces of that (Bihar survey, Rohini) without a settled national instrument.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD K[Kalelkar] --> M[Mandal 27 percent] M --> I[Indra Sawhney] I --> N[NCBC 102 105] S[State commissions] --> G[Two lists Centre / state]
Conclusion
OBC lists grew from Kalelkar’s unused catalogue to Mandal’s 27 percent, Indra Sawhney’s rules, a constitutional NCBC, a shock after the 102nd Amendment, and restoration by the 105th. States and the Union keep separate gazettes. The method is commission plus data plus court, not a blood test.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Identify the contemporary limitations in the process of tribal development. How can anthropological knowledge contribute in this process?
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is OBC the same as Shudra varna?
No. The list is empirical and political. Some Shudra groups are dominant and fail the data test; some Muslim and Christian occupational groups are included in states.
-
Why two lists?
Federalism. Union jobs follow the Central list; state jobs follow the state list. A person may be OBC for one and not the other.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Soanian cultural' tradition -
2025 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste domination, factionalism and political power -
2025 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's philosophy with respect to Arunachal Pradesh -
2025 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Delineate the major features of S. S. Sarkar's classification of Indian populations. Was his classification better than Risley? Explain -
2025 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Describe the distinctive features and distribution of Upper Palaeolithic of India -
2025 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the concept of Scheduled Tribe (ST) and mention the limitations of administrator's criteria -
2025 · Q5(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Tribalism and Pseudotribalism -
2025 · Q5(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Varnashrama and its contemporary relevance
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Soanian cultural' tradition
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
The Soanian is a cobble-tool tradition of the north-west Siwalik rivers, named by de Terra and Paterson. Typical tools are choppers, chopping tools and flakes in quartzite, not handaxe–cleaver sets. Indian occurrences include Pinjore–Nalagarh, Guler and related Beas–Sutlej terraces. Movius once opposed it to Acheulian Asia; later work finds overlap and mixed surface collections. It records Pleistocene foothill settlement, not a separate race of makers.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste domination, factionalism and political power
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Srinivas’s dominant caste combines numbers, land, rank and an educated elite. Factions are vertical followings around leaders, described by Bailey and others. Village domination scaled into regional parties after adult franchise. Mandal and Indra Sawhney widened OBC claims; panchayat reservation shares some offices. Caste blocs remain, but they now work through parties, cooperatives and social media as well as the village.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Regionalism and Autonomy
The concept of ethnicity
Regionalism politicises territory through language, tribe, history or economy. Autonomy is the constitutional reply: new states, Fifth and Sixth Schedules, PESA, Article 371, Inner Line. Bhuria and Xaxa named the gap between paper PESA and practice. Bommai, Sarkaria and Punchhi frame the Union–state balance. Examples include Telangana, Bodoland, Gorkhaland, Naga accords and resource belts under Samata and FRA.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.