Revision summary
Srinivas’s dominant caste combines numbers, land, rank and an educated elite. Factions are vertical followings around leaders, described by Bailey and others. Village domination scaled into regional parties after adult franchise. Mandal and Indra Sawhney widened OBC claims; panchayat reservation shares some offices. Caste blocs remain, but they now work through parties, cooperatives and social media as well as the village.
Model answer
Introduction
Caste domination, factionalism and political power are three linked ways of reading rural and regional India. M. N. Srinivas named the dominant caste. F. G. Bailey, Ralph Nicholas and later political anthropologists named the faction. Together they explain why numbers, land and office travel together.
Body
Dominant caste
Srinivas, from Rampura and other Mysore villages, said a caste is dominant when it is numerous, owns a large share of local land, ranks fairly high, and has a Western-educated elite. Numerical strength plus economic control plus ritual rank produces local power. Okkaligas in parts of Karnataka, Jats in western Uttar Pradesh and Haryana, Reddys and Kammas in Andhra, and Yadavs in parts of Bihar and UP have played this role at different scales.
Domination is local and historical. A caste that dominates one taluk may be a minority in the next. André Béteille in Tanjore showed how land reform, tenancy and education can split economic power from ritual rank.
Factionalism
A faction is a vertical following around a leader, not a horizontal class. Kin, clients, debtors and caste-fellows gather behind a big man. Bailey’s Bisipara (Odisha) and Nicholas’s Bengal work showed that village politics often splits into two or more such blocs. Elections, panchayat seats and irrigation disputes become the public face of private followings.
Factions cut across a single caste and can join unlike castes. They also reproduce caste, because the leader’s first pool of trust is still kin and jati.
From village to political power
After adult franchise, dominant-caste networks fed state parties. Charan Singh’s Jat base, Lalu Prasad Yadav’s Yadav–Muslim arithmetic, and the Reddy–Kamma contest in Andhra are regional translations of Srinivas’s village fact. The 73rd Amendment and Panchayati Raj put offices into the same arena. Rotating reservation for SC, ST and women, read with K. Krishna Murthy and later panchayat cases, forces some sharing of chairs without ending landed influence.
Mandal (1990) and Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) shifted the grammar from a few landed “dominant” castes to a wider OBC claim on the state. New elites — Yadav, Kurmi, Thevar, Vokkaliga — used both numbers and reservation. Older twice-born domination did not vanish; it moved into education, urban capital and upper-house networks.
The Sachar Committee (2006) and later caste surveys in Bihar showed that political power and census categories still follow community blocs. Factionalism now lives in WhatsApp groups and cooperative societies as much as in the village chaupal.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Dominant caste] --> L[Land and numbers] D --> F[Faction / leader] F --> P[Panchayat and party] M[Mandal and Indra Sawhney] --> P
Conclusion
Dominant caste explains who owns the village. Faction explains how that ownership is organised as a following. Adult franchise, Mandal and panchayat law turned both into electoral machines without abolishing either.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Regionalism and Autonomy
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Is a dominant caste the same as a high caste?
No. A numerically strong landed Shudra caste can dominate a village where Brahmins are few and poor.
-
Did Mandal end dominant-caste politics?
It multiplied claimants. Landed OBC groups used the new language of backwardness while still behaving as Srinivas’s dominant castes in many districts.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Soanian cultural' tradition -
2025 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's philosophy with respect to Arunachal Pradesh -
2025 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Delineate the major features of S. S. Sarkar's classification of Indian populations. Was his classification better than Risley? Explain -
2025 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Describe the distinctive features and distribution of Upper Palaeolithic of India -
2025 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the concept of Scheduled Tribe (ST) and mention the limitations of administrator's criteria -
2025 · Q5(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Tribalism and Pseudotribalism -
2025 · Q5(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Varnashrama and its contemporary relevance -
2025 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Lothal dockyard and international trade relations.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Soanian cultural' tradition
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
The Soanian is a cobble-tool tradition of the north-west Siwalik rivers, named by de Terra and Paterson. Typical tools are choppers, chopping tools and flakes in quartzite, not handaxe–cleaver sets. Indian occurrences include Pinjore–Nalagarh, Guler and related Beas–Sutlej terraces. Movius once opposed it to Acheulian Asia; later work finds overlap and mixed surface collections. It records Pleistocene foothill settlement, not a separate race of makers.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Regionalism and Autonomy
The concept of ethnicity
Regionalism politicises territory through language, tribe, history or economy. Autonomy is the constitutional reply: new states, Fifth and Sixth Schedules, PESA, Article 371, Inner Line. Bhuria and Xaxa named the gap between paper PESA and practice. Bommai, Sarkaria and Punchhi frame the Union–state balance. Examples include Telangana, Bodoland, Gorkhaland, Naga accords and resource belts under Samata and FRA.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's philosophy with respect to Arunachal Pradesh
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
A Philosophy for NEFA is Elwin’s working policy for today’s Arunachal, allied to Nehru’s tribal Panchsheel. It rejects museum isolation and sudden assimilation, and it guards land, art and village council. Ghurye wanted tribes absorbed as backward Hindus; Elwin said NEFA was not a plains jati. After 1962, roads and statehood thickened administration; Inner Line and custom still structure land. Dam, settlement and outsider-land debates are the living form of the same argument.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.