Revision summary
Ethno-nationalism is the political claim of an ethnic people to a state or autonomy. Geertz (primordial attachment), Barth (boundary) and Brass (elites) are the core lens. Resurgence follows weakened class ideology, census-media numbers, resource conflicts and indigenous world talk. Indian cases include Naga, Mizo, Bodo, Gorkha, Jharkhand, linguistic nativism and majoritarian fusion with religion. It can defend language and land; it can also create inner minorities.
Model answer
Introduction
Ethno-nationalism is the claim that a people defined by ethnicity — language, tribe, religion as descent, or a named history — ought to have a state, or a state-like autonomy. Anthropology treats it as a modern way of organising identity, not as a return to a tribal essence. Its resurgence is the return of that claim after a period when class, secular party or developmental nationalism seemed to dominate.
Body
The lens
Clifford Geertz (Old Societies and New States) described primordial attachments — blood, language, sacredness — that new states inherit. Fredrik Barth showed that ethnicity is a boundary maintained by contact, not a museum culture. Paul Brass and instrumentalists stress elites who convert culture into votes. Walker Connor called the nation a felt kinship. Indian material needs all three: feeling, boundary, and organisation.
Ethno-nationalism differs from civic nationalism (Constitution as membership) and from religious fundamentalism (scripture as law), though they can fuse (majoritarian Hindu rashtra talk; Khalistan; some Islamist nationalisms). Tribal ethno-nationalism asks for a Jharkhand, a Nagalim, a Bodoland, or a Sixth Schedule, often without exiting India.
Why resurgence
After 1989, socialist class language weakened globally; census, television and later social media made ethnic numbers visible. In India, Mandal, Mandir, and the reorganisation of states (2000, 2014) taught that identity pays. Insurgency and peace accords in the North-East institutionalised ethnicity as a negotiating unit. Global indigenous discourse (UNDRIP, even without ILO 169 in India) gave ST movements a world vocabulary of peoples.
Economic liberalisation produced winners in some linguistic states and losers in tribal resource belts; mining and dams (Narmada, Niyamgiri, Jharkhand coal) ethnicised development conflict. Diasporas fund homeland parties. COVID-19 and migration revived “outsider” talk in cities and in Assam.
Indian illustrations
Naga nationalism is the longest; accords try to fit it inside the Union. Mizo ethno-nationalism became a state. Bodo and Gorkha movements seek councils or states. Jharkhand fused tribe and region. Tamil, Telangana and Shiv Sena nativism show that ethno-nationalism is not only tribal. Khalistan and Kashmiri nationalisms (distinct histories) show the hard edge. Majoritarian Hindu nationalism is ethno-religious: it uses a civilisational majority rather than a small people, which is why Ghurye’s unity and Ambedkar’s warning both remain relevant.
Resurgence does not mean every tribe wants a nation. Many want PESA, FRA and dignity inside the republic. Anthropology’s task is to see when a cultural boundary becomes a sovereignty claim, and when the state answers with autonomy rather than only force.
Risks
Ethno-nationalism can protect a language. It can also minoritise an inner other (Muslims in a Hindu nation-talk; non-Bodos in BTR; Bru in Mizoram). Barth’s boundary is always two-sided. A secular, liberal, democratic state (the next question’s contrast) must allow cultural politics without letting blood define citizenship.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Ethnic boundary] --> N[Ethno-national claim] N --> A[Autonomy or secession] M[Media numbers resources] --> N I[Inner minority] --> R[Risk of exclusion]
Conclusion
Ethno-nationalism is ethnicity organised as a claim to political sovereignty or autonomy. It has resurged because numbers, media, resource conflict and weak class language make peoplehood pay. In India it ranges from Sixth Schedule demands to majoritarian nation-talk. The anthropological question is who is enclosed as the people, and who is left outside the boundary.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Material culture and archaeology
Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q1(a)). View answer →
-
Is every regional party ethno-nationalist?
No. Many bargain inside the Constitution for a larger share. Ethno-nationalism begins when the ethnic we is treated as the rightful owner of the territory.
-
Is tribal self-rule secession?
PESA and Sixth Schedule are autonomy inside the Union. Secession denies the Constitution. Movements may slide from one to the other; the words are not the same.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Digitisation of rural economy -
2024 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Origin of State Societies -
2024 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Syro-Malabar Christians -
2024 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Artisan tribes of Jharkhand -
2024 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Causes of stunting and wasting among tribal children. -
2024 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
How is PESA Act empowering local self-governance and impacting women's political participation? -
2024 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically describe evidences from Rakhi Garhi and its linkages to Harappan civilization. -
2024 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
B.K. Roy Burman's concept of 'Buffer Zone'
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Trace the history and describe the methods of formulating the lists of OBCs, both at the State and National levels
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Kalelkar listed; Mandal implemented 27 percent with social-educational-economic tests. Indra Sawhney added creamy layer and a 50 percent ceiling. 102nd Amendment constitutionalised NCBC; 105th restored state lists after the Maratha judgment. Rohini tries to sub-categorise Central OBCs; Ram Singh required data for Jat inclusion. Centre and states maintain separate lists; method is gazette politics under judicial review.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"The village was not merely a place where people lived; it had a design in which were reflected the basic values of Indian civilization." Who said this? Elaborate
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
The statement is from the Srinivas village-studies tradition: the village as a designed microcosm of Indian civilisation. Design includes caste ecology, agrarian rank, ritual calendar and factional politics. Values: hierarchy-with-interdependence, local dharma, jati marriage, sacred geography. Marriott, Dube and Bailey showed regional versions of the same idea. Land reform, migration, 73rd Amendment and PESA have rewritten the plan without erasing rank.
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Lothal dockyard and international trade relations.
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
S. R. Rao identified a burnt-brick tidal basin at Lothal as a dock beside warehouses and bead workshops. Gujarat Harappan coastal sites together support craft export to the Gulf and Mesopotamia (Meluhha). Some archaeologists prefer a reservoir reading; geomorphology of the estuary is still discussed. Even without the word dock, Lothal is a water-edge trade and craft town. International trade here is Bronze Age Gulf networks, not a modern port trust.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.