Q4(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q4 Q5 →

Is caste mobility a recent phenomenon? Discuss in the light of Indological and Empirical context.

Topic: Caste system in India. Syllabus: 3.2 Caste system in India—Structure and characteristics, Varna and caste, Theories of origin of caste system, Dominant caste, Caste mobility, Future of caste system, Jajmani system. Tribe-caste continuum. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2023 and Caste system in India.

Revision summary

Caste mobility as group rank-claim is old: dynastic Kshatriya status, grants, and Puranic origin tales. Srinivas and Bailey show village and frontier mobility in the twentieth century. The colonial census froze names and made paper rank fights. Mandal, Indra Sawhney, and adult franchise made the state the main arena. Ambedkarite assertion is a recent path that refuses Sanskritisation as the only honourable move.

Model answer

Introduction

Caste mobility is the movement of a person or a group in the rank order of jati and varna. It is not a product only of modern jobs and elections. Indology and ethnography both show older paths. What is recent is the scale, the state, and the language of rights.

Body

Indological context

  • Dharmashastra presents varna as birth-based, yet it records apad dharma, mixed unions, and the vrata of groups seeking recognition.
  • Kshatriya status was claimed by many regional dynasties. Rajput formation, discussed by Dirk Kolff and others, is a long military-and-marriage process, not a Vedic fossil.
  • Temple inscriptions and copper plates show land grants that raise a group’s local rank. Kayastha and other scribal groups negotiated status across centuries.
  • Bhakti saints criticised birth rank and opened devotion; they did not abolish jati, but they made a moral path around it.
  • Sanskritisation in Srinivas’s sense has pre-modern analogues: claims to gotra, vegetarian style, and Puranic origin.

Empirical and historical context

  • M. N. Srinivas showed twentieth-century village mobility through ritual copying after land and numbers rose.
  • F. G. Bailey showed political and economic mobility on a tribe–caste frontier.
  • Colonial census froze names and made rank a paper fight. That was new as a technology, not as a desire to rise.
  • Non-Brahmin movements, Phule, Periyar, Ambedkar, and Mandal (1990) made mobility a claim on the state: education, jobs, and elected office.
  • Indra Sawhney (1992) and later OBC lists turned empirical backwardness into a legal ladder. This is recent as constitutional machinery.

What is not recent

  • Group climbing through land, war, sect, and origin tales is old.
  • Individual escape through sainthood, army, or city trade is old.

What is recent

  • Adult franchise, reservation, courts, and a national OBC/SC public.
  • Urban jobs and English education as a mass path.
  • Dalit assertion that rejects Sanskritisation as the only honourable climb.

Answer

  • Caste mobility is not recent as a social fact.
  • Recent tools have changed its speed, its arena, and who can refuse the old ritual path.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  I[Indology inscriptions] --> O[Old group claims]
  E[Srinivas Bailey] --> V[Village ritual mobility]
  M[Mandal reservation franchise] --> S[State path]
  O --> X[Not only recent]
  S --> N[New arena]

Conclusion

Indology and inscriptions show groups claiming higher rank long before the census. Village studies show Sanskritisation in living memory. The Republic added reservation and parties. Mobility is old; the democratic state path is new.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Scheduled areas

    Next question in the 2023 paper (Q5). View answer →

  • Did Manu freeze caste forever?

    The text ranks birth strongly, but history shows claims, grants, and sects moving groups. Text is an ideal, not a full social film.

  • Is reservation the first caste mobility?

    No. It is the first large constitutional machinery for it. Ritual and military claims are older.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    What are the different types of caste mobility in India? Highlight the various factors responsible for it

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q7(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss the theories on the origin of caste system and its criticism in India. Differentiate between caste, class, and race.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Jajmani system : continuity and change

    View answer →

  4. 2023 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Is annihilation of caste possible? Discuss the future of caste system in the light of various proactive measures taken by the Indian State.

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Critically describe Dr. B. R. Ambedkar's argument on the origin of Indian caste system

    View answer →

  6. 2022 · Q7(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss the issues and solutions related to the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribe populations in India

    View answer →

  7. 2021 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Relevance of tribe-caste continuum

    View answer →

  8. 2016 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Examine the structural and cultural theories of caste system in India

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Material culture and archaeology

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Material culture is objects and built space left by people. Archaeology recovers them in stratigraphy and infers subsistence, rank, and exchange. Binford stressed function; Hodder stressed meaning. Indian illustrations include Hunsgi, Navdatoli, Bhimbetka, and Harappan weights. Ethnography of living potters and hunters checks how objects enter the soil.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Interface between Purushartha and Ashrama

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Purushartha is dharma, artha, kama, and moksha. Ashrama is student, householder, forest-dweller, and renouncer. The householder is the stage that must hold artha and kama under dharma. Dumont and Kane treat the pairing as a civilisational ideal. Karve’s ethnography shows that most lives remain in the household stage.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Jajmani system : continuity and change

Caste system in India

Jajmani is hereditary service of artisan and serving castes for landed patrons, named by Wiser. Beidelman stressed coercion; Srinivas and Lewis described harvest shares and rites. Ritual calls to barber and priest continue in many villages. Cash wages, mills, land reform, and MGNREGA have broken daily dependence. Epstein’s Mysore villages show the market replacing customary shares.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.