Revision summary
Risley used seven racial types and nasal index, tied to caste rank, in the 1901 census tradition. Sarkar used fewer types, an Australoid tribal base, and more caution about language equals race. Sarkar is better as a critique of colonial ranking, not as a final biology. Guha’s 1931 types are another typology. Law now counts social backwardness, not racial census boxes.
Model answer
Introduction
Herbert Hope Risley classified Indian peoples for the colonial census by anthropometry and caste rank. S. S. Sarkar classified them later as an Indian human biologist with more weight on tribes, language, and a simpler set of types. Both are racial typologies. Comparison is about method and politics, not about which race map is true forever.
Body
Risley’s approach
- Risley, in the 1901 census and The People of India, offered seven types: Turko-Iranian, Indo-Aryan, Scytho-Dravidian, Aryo-Dravidian, Mongolo-Dravidian, Mongoloid, and Dravidian.
- The nasal index was his favourite measurement. He linked finer noses to higher caste rank.
- The scheme served empire: inequality looked like biology. Tribe and caste were placed on one racial ladder.
Sarkar’s approach
- S. S. Sarkar proposed fewer types, commonly taught as Australoid, Indo-Aryan, Irano-Scythian, Mundari (or Mundari-Malayan), and Mongolian, with notes on possible Negrito traces in southern hills.
- He treated many South and central Indian populations as having an Australoid base with later overlays, rather than one “Dravidian race” matched to a language family.
- He used morphology, some blood-group data as it appeared, prehistoric archaeology, and tribal ethnography. He rejected Risley’s nose-to-varna ladder as the main story.
Comparison
- Criteria: Risley centred nasal index and caste; Sarkar centred broader morphology, tribes, and language as a separate map.
- Number of types: seven mixed labels versus a shorter list. Neither matches later genetics.
- Politics: Risley naturalised colonial hierarchy. Sarkar is post-colonial in mood and less useful for ranking jatis, but still boxes living people.
- B. S. Guha’s 1931 types are a third typology often taught beside both. People of India (Anthropological Survey) later described communities as cultural units.
Critical judgement
- Sarkar is better than Risley because he weakens caste-as-race and takes Munda and other tribes seriously.
- Both fail as modern biology. Clines, mixture, and endogamy (later population genetics) replace types.
- Administration should use ST, SC, and OBC as legal-social lists, not Risley or Sarkar types. Indra Sawhney treats backwardness as social and educational.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD R[Risley] --> N[Nasal index seven types] R --> C[Caste as race] S[Sarkar] --> T[Fewer types tribes] S --> L[Language not equal biology] G[Genetics] --> X[Clines mixture]
Conclusion
Risley measured noses and mapped them onto caste for the census. Sarkar reduced types and separated language from a single Dravidian race. Sarkar is the less colonial of the two. Neither is a living scientific map of the peoples of India.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Scheduled areas
Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q5(a)). View answer →
-
Should Sarkar’s types issue caste certificates?
No. ST, SC, and OBC are legal lists. Biology does not certify a jati.
-
Did Sarkar prove a living Negrito race in India?
He discussed traces. Later genetics has not established a separate mainland Negrito race in the popular census sense.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Material culture and archaeology -
2023 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Interface between Purushartha and Ashrama -
2023 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Prehistoric rock arts from Uttarakhand -
2023 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
"Indus Valley was the first settlement of the big civilization." Comment critically. -
2023 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Was Mesolithic culture the first step towards a sedentary way of life? Illustrate your answer by citing suitable examples. -
2023 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Scheduled areas -
2023 · Q5(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Village as little republic -
2023 · Q5(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Dravidian language and their subgroups
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Trace the history and describe the methods of formulating the lists of OBCs, both at the State and National levels
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Kalelkar listed; Mandal implemented 27 percent with social-educational-economic tests. Indra Sawhney added creamy layer and a 50 percent ceiling. 102nd Amendment constitutionalised NCBC; 105th restored state lists after the Maratha judgment. Rohini tries to sub-categorise Central OBCs; Ram Singh required data for Jat inclusion. Centre and states maintain separate lists; method is gazette politics under judicial review.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"The village was not merely a place where people lived; it had a design in which were reflected the basic values of Indian civilization." Who said this? Elaborate
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
The statement is from the Srinivas village-studies tradition: the village as a designed microcosm of Indian civilisation. Design includes caste ecology, agrarian rank, ritual calendar and factional politics. Values: hierarchy-with-interdependence, local dharma, jati marriage, sacred geography. Marriott, Dube and Bailey showed regional versions of the same idea. Land reform, migration, 73rd Amendment and PESA have rewritten the plan without erasing rank.
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Lothal dockyard and international trade relations.
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
S. R. Rao identified a burnt-brick tidal basin at Lothal as a dock beside warehouses and bead workshops. Gujarat Harappan coastal sites together support craft export to the Gulf and Mesopotamia (Meluhha). Some archaeologists prefer a reservoir reading; geomorphology of the estuary is still discussed. Even without the word dock, Lothal is a water-edge trade and craft town. International trade here is Bronze Age Gulf networks, not a modern port trust.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.