Q4(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks · 1 min read

← Q1(e)

Critically examine the concept of communalism and its relevance for multi-religious and multiethnic polity of India

Topic: Ethno-archaeology in India. Syllabus: 1.3 Ethno-archaeology in India: The concept of ethno-archaeology; Survivals and Parallels among the hunting, foraging, fishing, pastoral and peasant communities including arts and crafts producing communities. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Ethno-archaeology in India.

Revision summary

Communalism politicises religion as a bloc against others. It is modern, fed by census and electorates, not a timeless Indian essence. Srinivas’s jati world is flatter in communal talk than in the village. It threatens a multi-religious polity by capturing the common roll. It also hides tribe and language inside a two-faith story.

Model answer

Introduction

Communalism is the political use of religious identity as a bloc that claims the state. In a multi-religious and multiethnic India it is both a colonial inheritance and a living electoral language.

Body

The concept

  • Colonial census and separate electorates taught Indians to count as Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, or Christian publics.
  • Bipan Chandra and many historians treated communalism as modern politics, not ancient faith war.
  • Anthropology adds M. N. Srinivas’s jati and Louis Dumont’s hierarchy: everyday life is ranked and mixed; communalism flattens it into two or three armies.

Relevance for the polity

  • A multi-religious republic needs Articles 25–30 and a common roll. Communalism tries to make the roll a religious census.
  • Multiethnic reality includes language, tribe, and region. Communal frames hide Fifth and Sixth Schedule questions and linguistic minorities inside a Hindu–Muslim plot.
  • Riots, personal-law fights, and conversion panics are the operational face. They punish mixed towns and mixed marriages.

Critique

  • The concept can itself become too Hindu–Muslim, ignoring caste blocs and tribal faiths.
  • Not every festival or shrine dispute is communalism. The test is whether religion is organised to capture the state against others.
  • N. K. Bose’s civilisational unity and Nehru’s civic nation are the counter-concepts: diversity housed by law, not by a single sacred majority.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  C[Communalism] --> B[Religious blocs]
  J[Jati tribe language] --> P[Plural polity]
  C --> R[Riot electoral veto]

Conclusion

Communalism remains relevant because it still converts faith into a vote and a veto. A multiethnic polity survives by keeping jati, language, and tribe visible, and by refusing a two-community state.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Is communalism the same as religiosity?

    No. Faith can be local and mixed. Communalism organises faith as a political army.

  • Does ethnicity replace communalism?

    Language and tribe are other politicised identities. Communalism is the religious form.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2016 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Ethno-archaeological evidences for the survival of hunting-gathering traditions in India.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q1(e) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Ethno-archaeological evidences for the survival of hunting-gathering traditions in India.

Ethno-archaeology in India

Living foragers such as Chenchu and Birhor supply analogues for Indian Mesolithic camps. Haimendorf and Elwin recorded hunt, honey, and seasonal mobility. Bhimbetka and Belan finds are read through those kits. No group is a frozen palaeolithic race. FRA and wages are already changing the same traditions.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.