Revision summary
Caste organises booths, tickets, and reservation blocs. Srinivas’s dominant caste still explains many rural seats. Bailey treated caste teams as political machines. Class and communal crises can cut across jati, then caste returns. Contemporary politics uses caste as arithmetic more than as shastra.
Model answer
Introduction
Caste remains the local grammar of Indian politics. Parties speak development; booths still count jati.
Body
How it works
- M. N. Srinivas’s dominant caste still delivers numbers in many rural seats.
- Reservations, OBC blocs, and Dalit parties turned jati into a constitutional vote, not only a ritual rank.
- F. G. Bailey already saw caste teams as political machines. Television and phones scaled that machine.
Limits
- Class, religion, and region cut the same jati. Urban youth may hide caste and still marry it.
- Communalism can override caste in a riot week, then caste returns at the ticket.
- Relevance is therefore high in mobilisation, not as the only identity.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD C[Caste] --> D[Dominant caste numbers] C --> R[Reservation blocs] C --> P[Party tickets]
Conclusion
Caste is still the most reliable political arithmetic in much of India. Law and media changed its form; they did not retire it.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Write about the contribution made by Christoph von Fürer-Haimendorf to tribal anthropology in India
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q2(a)). View answer →
-
Did urbanisation end caste politics?
It hid some talk. Marriage, housing, and tickets still track jati.
-
Is this the same as communalism?
Communalism organises religion. Caste politics organises jati. They can ally or clash.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy. -
2023 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically evaluate the contributions of S.C. Roy to Indian anthropology. -
2022 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Illustrate the contribution of Irawati Karve to Indian Anthropology. Make a special mention of her literary contribution -
2022 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Assess the contributions of S. C. Dube in Indian village studies -
2022 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the views of G. S. Ghurye and Verrier Elwin on the approach towards tribal populations. What are the policies of the Government of India towards Indian tribal populations? -
2022 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Compare the nature of tribal movements between North-East and Central India. Briefly mention the current status of existing tribal movements in these areas -
2022 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Briefly describe the anthropological perspective on development. How have anthropologists contributed in India's rural development? -
2016 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Write about the contribution made by Christoph von Fürer-Haimendorf to tribal anthropology in India
More from this topic
Q3(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Highlight the significant contributions of B. S. Guha, Irawati Karve and S. R. K. Chopra to Indian Anthropology
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
Guha: 1931 racial types, ASI institution, Harappan osteology; typology is the limit. Karve: kinship organisation, Maharashtra, epics, north–south marriage contrast. Chopra: Siwalik Sivapithecus school at Chandigarh; Ramapithecus later revised. Together they cover living measurement, civilisation-as-kinship, and Miocene fossils. Keep their questions; update their boxes with genetics and ethnography.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Describe ILO's Convention No. 169 (1989) on Indigenous and Tribal people. Is India a signatory to it?
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
ILO Convention 169 (1989) covers indigenous and tribal peoples and stresses self-identification, consultation, land and custom. It replaced the integrationist Convention 107 (1957). India ratified 107 and has not ratified 169. Indian hesitation cites the ST list, sovereignty and land law; PESA and FRA already resemble 169 in parts. Never state that India is a signatory to 169.
Q2(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy.
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
Colonial anthropology served census, forest and criminal-tribe administration. S. C. Roy professionalised ethnography; ASI and university departments Indianised the job. Ghurye versus Elwin was an Indian debate on assimilation and isolation. Srinivas, Karve, Bose, Majumdar and Vidyarthi supplied Indian concepts and village-tribe fields. Autonomy means an Indian agenda and terms, not a refusal of world methods.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.