Revision summary
Living foragers such as Chenchu and Birhor supply analogues for Indian Mesolithic camps. Haimendorf and Elwin recorded hunt, honey, and seasonal mobility. Bhimbetka and Belan finds are read through those kits. No group is a frozen palaeolithic race. FRA and wages are already changing the same traditions.
Model answer
Introduction
Ethno-archaeology reads living foragers to explain old camps. In India it shows hunting-gathering as a surviving economic strand, not a finished prehistory.
Body
Living analogues
- Groups such as Chenchu, Birhor, and some Andaman communities keep hunt, honey, and forest exchange beside wage work.
- Fürer-Haimendorf on the Chenchu and Elwin on forest peoples recorded kits that resemble Mesolithic scatter: microlith-like tools, seasonal camps, and sharing.
- Bhimbetka hunt scenes and Belan microliths gain sense when compared with these camps.
Caution
- No living group is a frozen Mesolithic. FRA and the forest department already reshape the same people.
- Evidence is analogy plus continuity of forest niche, not a racial leftover of Risley.
- Survival is partial: the tradition lives as a skill set inside a mixed tribal economy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Ethno-archaeology] --> C[Chenchu Birhor] E --> M[Mesolithic camps] F[FRA forest law] --> C
Conclusion
Ethno-archaeology in India links Mesolithic camps to living forest foragers. The tradition survives in practice, under legal and market pressure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically examine the concept of communalism and its relevance for multi-religious and multiethnic polity of India
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q4(a)). View answer →
-
Are these groups ‘Stone Age people’?
No. They are contemporary citizens with mixed livelihoods.
-
Does analogy prove a site’s diet?
It suggests possibilities. Bones and residues still have to match.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2015 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine the concept of communalism and its relevance for multi-religious and multiethnic polity of India
More from this topic
Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine the concept of communalism and its relevance for multi-religious and multiethnic polity of India
Ethno-archaeology in India
Communalism politicises religion as a bloc against others. It is modern, fed by census and electorates, not a timeless Indian essence. Srinivas’s jati world is flatter in communal talk than in the village. It threatens a multi-religious polity by capturing the common roll. It also hides tribe and language inside a two-faith story.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.