Q5(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5 Q5 →

Heritability and its estimation

Topic: Mendelian genetics in man-family study, single factor, multifactor, lethal, sub-lethal and polygenic inheritance in man.. Syllabus: 9.2 Mendelian genetics in man-family study, single factor, multifactor, lethal, sub-lethal and polygenic inheritance in man. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Mendelian genetics in man-family study, single factor, multifactor, lethal, sub-lethal and polygenic inheritance in man..

Revision summary

Heritability is a population-and-environment-specific share of phenotypic variance. Broad H² includes all genetic variance; narrow h² includes additive variance. Fisher's variance partition underlies the concept. Twin, adoption, pedigree and parent–offspring designs estimate familial resemblance. Equal-environment assumptions and gene–environment correlation limit twin estimates. High heritability does not mean immutability or explain group differences.

Model answer

Introduction

Heritability is the proportion of observed phenotypic variance in a specified population and environment attributable to genetic variance. It does not measure how genetic an individual's trait is, nor does a high value make a trait unchangeable.

Body

Concept and estimation

Quantitative genetics partitions phenotypic variance as V(P) = V(G) + V(E) + interactions. Broad-sense heritability, H² = V(G)/V(P), includes additive, dominance and epistatic variance. Narrow-sense heritability, h² = V(A)/V(P), retains additive variance and best predicts response to selection; R. A. Fisher supplied the variance framework.

Estimation uses resemblance among relatives:

  • parent–offspring regression and sibling correlations estimate additive familial resemblance;
  • classical twin studies compare monozygotic with dizygotic twins, often using h² ≈ 2(rMZ − rDZ) under restrictive assumptions;
  • adoption studies separate resemblance to biological and rearing relatives;
  • pedigrees and modern genomic relatedness methods estimate variance components in large samples.

Height is highly heritable in many well-nourished populations, yet mean stature can rise rapidly with nutrition. IQ estimates similarly vary by age, class and environment. Twin estimates assume comparable environments and may be inflated by gene–environment correlation, assortative mating or shared prenatal conditions. Population stratification can also distort genomic estimates.

Thus heritability is local to population, age, environment and measurement. It says nothing directly about between-population causes.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  VP[Phenotypic variance] --> VG[Genetic variance]
  VP --> VE[Environmental variance]
  VG --> VA[Additive]
  VG --> VD[Dominance and epistasis]
  VA --> H[Narrow h squared]
  VG --> B[Broad H squared]

Conclusion

Heritability converts family resemblance into a variance estimate. Used carefully, it clarifies polygenic variation; used as destiny, it revives biological determinism. The anthropological answer must always specify whose population and which environment.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Authority and forms of political organization

    Next question in the 2024 paper (Q5). View answer →

  • Does 80% heritability mean 80% of a person's height is genetic?

    No. It describes variance among people in one sampled environment, not fractions of an individual.

  • Can heritability change?

    Yes. Alter the environment, age range, population or measurement and the variance ratio can change.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Lethal and sublethal genes

    View answer →

  3. 2024 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Single-gene mutation disorders in man.

    View answer →

  4. 2024 · Q7(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    What is a multifactorial trait? Illustrate your answer with suitable human examples.

    View answer →

  5. 2024 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Describe the genetics and inheritance patterns of the ABO and Rh blood groups in man.

    View answer →

  6. 2023 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Polygenic Inheritance

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q8(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    What do you understand by Immunogenetics? Explain with suitable examples

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Attributes of culture

The Nature of Culture

Culture is a learned and symbolically mediated design for living. Its core attributes are sharing, symbolism, patterning, adaptation, transmission and change. Tylor supplies the complex whole; Geertz supplies public meaning; Bourdieu links culture to embodied practice. Kula shows integration of exchange, rank, ritual and inter-island relations. Shared culture is never identical experience: gender, class, age and power matter. Treat integration as a question, not as automatic harmony.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Harappan maritime trade

Meaning, Scope and development of Anthropology.

Harappan maritime trade joined Indus rivers and coastal sites to Oman, Bahrain and Mesopotamia. Lothal, Dholavira, Kuntasi, Balakot and Sutkagen-dor were important nodes. Meluhha texts, Indus seals, Gulf materials and etched carnelian beads provide converging evidence. Exports included crafted beads, shell, ivory, timber and probably textiles; metals moved inward. Lothal’s basin may be a dock or reservoir, so do not make the whole case depend on it. Trade supported craft specialisation and urban integration but was not the sole cause of Harappan civilisation.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Critical perspective on avoidance and joking relationship

The Nature of Culture

Avoidance prescribes reserve; joking licenses teasing between named kin categories. Radcliffe-Brown read both as complementary ways of regulating conjunction and separation. Mother-in-law/son-in-law avoidance and cross-cousin or junior-affine joking are common patterns. Symmetrical joking permits reciprocity; asymmetrical joking protects one-sided licence. Gluckman highlights ritualised expression of contradiction. Critical analysis asks whether joking reproduces gendered power and whether rules match actual conduct.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.