Revision summary
Authority is legitimate command; power is capacity to produce outcomes. Weber distinguished traditional, charismatic and legal-rational authority. Bands rely mainly on persuasive, situational leaders. Nuer segmentary lineages coordinate without a central ruler. Chiefdoms join hereditary rank, redistribution and ritual. States centralise territory, law, tax and coercion; Service's sequence is typology, not destiny.
Model answer
Introduction
Authority is socially recognised legitimacy to command; power is the capacity to secure an outcome even without consent. Political anthropology asks how both are organised where no formal government exists as well as in states.
Body
Authority and political scale
Max Weber distinguished traditional, charismatic and legal-rational authority. Anthropologists add that legitimacy may rest in kinship, ritual knowledge, age, generosity or control of coercion.
- Band: small, mobile and egalitarian; leadership is situational and persuasive. Among Ju/'hoansi foragers, skilled persons influence but cannot routinely compel. Richard Lee's “insulting the meat” shows levelling against boastful hunters.
- Tribe or segmentary system: dispersed communities coordinate through kin groups, councils, age sets and ritual offices. In E. E. Evans-Pritchard's Nuer, balanced lineage opposition supplies order without a central sovereign; the leopard-skin chief mediates rather than rules.
- Chiefdom: hereditary rank and an office of chief integrate several communities through redistribution, tribute and ritual. Polynesian chiefdoms illustrate ranked descent and mana, though Elman Service's evolutionary sequence should not be treated as inevitable.
- State: central government claims territory, taxation, law and specialised coercion. Fortes and Evans-Pritchard contrasted centralised African kingdoms such as the Zulu with stateless lineage systems.
Indian examples range from village councils and Naga customary institutions to the constitutionally sovereign state. Colonial indirect rule often hardened fluid chiefs into offices. Gender, class and dissent also reveal that proclaimed legitimacy never eliminates contested power.
Flow diagram
flowchart LR B[Band: persuasion] --> T[Tribe: kin and councils] T --> C[Chiefdom: hereditary rank] C --> S[State: law and coercion] A[Authority] --> L[Legitimacy] P[Power] --> O[Capacity to secure outcomes]
Conclusion
Authority varies from earned influence to hereditary office and bureaucratic law. Bands, segmentary lineages, chiefdoms and states are comparative types, not a ladder every society must climb. Legitimacy, material control and resistance must be studied together.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Single-gene mutation disorders in man.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Are stateless societies without politics?
No. Kinship, ritual, feud settlement and councils organise public order without a central state.
-
Is every influential person an authority?
Not necessarily. Influence becomes authority when followers recognise a legitimate right to direct or decide.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the mechanism of social control in different kinds of political systems -
2021 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do political organisations of simple societies establish power, authority and legitimacy? -
2016 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss different social control mechanisms in simple societies.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Attributes of culture
The Nature of Culture
Culture is a learned and symbolically mediated design for living. Its core attributes are sharing, symbolism, patterning, adaptation, transmission and change. Tylor supplies the complex whole; Geertz supplies public meaning; Bourdieu links culture to embodied practice. Kula shows integration of exchange, rank, ritual and inter-island relations. Shared culture is never identical experience: gender, class, age and power matter. Treat integration as a question, not as automatic harmony.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Harappan maritime trade
Meaning, Scope and development of Anthropology.
Harappan maritime trade joined Indus rivers and coastal sites to Oman, Bahrain and Mesopotamia. Lothal, Dholavira, Kuntasi, Balakot and Sutkagen-dor were important nodes. Meluhha texts, Indus seals, Gulf materials and etched carnelian beads provide converging evidence. Exports included crafted beads, shell, ivory, timber and probably textiles; metals moved inward. Lothal’s basin may be a dock or reservoir, so do not make the whole case depend on it. Trade supported craft specialisation and urban integration but was not the sole cause of Harappan civilisation.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critical perspective on avoidance and joking relationship
The Nature of Culture
Avoidance prescribes reserve; joking licenses teasing between named kin categories. Radcliffe-Brown read both as complementary ways of regulating conjunction and separation. Mother-in-law/son-in-law avoidance and cross-cousin or junior-affine joking are common patterns. Symmetrical joking permits reciprocity; asymmetrical joking protects one-sided licence. Gluckman highlights ritualised expression of contradiction. Critical analysis asks whether joking reproduces gendered power and whether rules match actual conduct.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.