Revision summary
Urban jobs push neolocal residence while property often stays joint. Shah’s point: jointness can survive split houses. Feminist movements targeted dowry, succession, and domestic violence. Laws changed the script faster than everyday kinship. The result is negotiated families, not one modern nuclear standard.
Model answer
Introduction
Urban work and feminist politics have both pressed the Indian family. The joint household did not vanish, but authority, marriage, and care were renegotiated.
Body
Urbanization
- Jobs, migration, and rented rooms favour neolocal nuclear units, as Gore, Kapadia, and later urban ethnography recorded.
- Remittances still feed a rural joint estate. Shah argued the joint family persists as property and ritual even when residence splits.
- Caste endogamy and arranged marriage adapt: matrimonial ads, not a free love market for all classes.
- Care of the old and the child becomes a crisis when women also work for wages.
Feminist movements
- From nineteenth-century social reform to 1970s campaigns, feminists named dowry death, domestic violence, and the Hindu Undivided Family as political.
- Law: Hindu Succession amendments, PNDT, and domestic violence statutes shift, slowly, who owns and who may leave.
- Shah Bano and later debates showed that gender justice and community law can collide.
- Women as earners claim voice in the house; the double shift of office and kitchen is the unfinished impact.
Together
- The city supplies the wage. Feminism names the inequality inside the household. Neither produced a single new family type.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD U[Urbanization] --> N[Neolocal wage] F[Feminism] --> L[Law property violence] U --> FAM[Indian family] F --> FAM
Conclusion
Urbanization splits residence more than it kills kin. Feminist movements politicised dowry, property, and violence. Indian family change is both demographic and legal.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Define family and critically examine the universality of family
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q3(a)). View answer →
-
Has the joint family disappeared in cities?
Co-residence fell in many classes. Ritual and property jointness often remain.
-
Did feminism only affect the middle class?
Campaigns began there, but law and SHGs also reach other classes, unevenly.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
How the study of variation in forms of marriage led to rethinking on the concepts of social reproduction, kinship and family? -
2024 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define urbanization and discuss its impact on family in India with examples. -
2023 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the role of marriage regulations in traditional societies in India for strengthening social solidarity. -
2022 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss how the rules of descent contradict the principles of residence in matrilineal society, mentioning suitable examples? -
2022 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Household and domestic group. -
2021 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Marriage Regulations and Alliance Theory -
2015 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define family and critically examine the universality of family
More from this topic
Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
How the study of variation in forms of marriage led to rethinking on the concepts of social reproduction, kinship and family?
Family
Marriage forms include woman-marriage, ghost marriage, polyandry, visiting unions, same-sex marriage and medically assisted parenthood. Evans-Pritchard’s Nuer and Nayar ethnography already split sex, residence and legitimacy. Schneider and Strathern treated kinship as cultural assignment, not bare biology. Family is not universally the Parsons nuclear unit. Social reproduction is how children, labour and status are placed across generations, as Engels and later feminist anthropologists argued. Living examples include IVF, surrogacy debates and chosen families.
Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define urbanization and discuss its impact on family in India with examples.
Family
Urbanization combines population concentration with urban occupations and institutions. Housing and mobility favour smaller households, delayed marriage and lower fertility. Desai distinguishes residence from jointness; Shah highlights the household developmental cycle. Indian families may be residentially nuclear but functionally joint through property, care, ritual and remittance. Women’s paid work can increase autonomy while adding a domestic double burden. Class, caste and migration diversify outcomes, so urbanization does not mechanically destroy the joint family.
Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the role of marriage regulations in traditional societies in India for strengthening social solidarity.
Family
Indian marriage rules combine caste endogamy with gotra and village exogamy. Karve mapped north–south differences, including Dravidian cross-cousin preference. Lévi-Strauss treats the rules as alliance that makes society. Dumont reads endogamy as the reproduction of hierarchy. Srinivas showed marriage as village politics and feast. Solidarity is group repair, including unequal hypergamy, not simple equality.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.