Why in news
- The Supreme Court refused to entertain a petition seeking the re-allocation of 70 TMC of Cauvery river water from Tamil Nadu to Karnataka.
- The Court reiterated that inter-State river water allocations settled by tribunal awards cannot be altered via routine writ petitions.
Key terms
Article 262
Constitutional provision allowing Parliament to enact laws for adjudicating disputes relating to inter-State rivers.
Cauvery Water Management Authority
Statutory body constituted to implement the final award of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal as modified by the Supreme Court.
Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956
Act establishing ad-hoc tribunals for inter-State river disputes, barring standard court jurisdiction.
TMC
Thousand Million Cubic feet, a standard unit of measurement for water volume in reservoir storage and river flows.
What is the legal framework?
- Article 262 empowers Parliament to adjudicate inter-State river water disputes and bar Supreme Court jurisdiction under statutory tribunals.
- The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 provides for tribunals whose decisions carry the force of a Supreme Court decree once published.
Key provisions and holding
- Before: Petitioners sought direct Supreme Court intervention under Article 32 to adjust allocation volumes fixed by statutory authorities.
- After: The Supreme Court maintained that party States must approach the Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA) or statutory dispute mechanisms for water distribution adjustments.
Why it matters
- Upholds judicial restraint under Article 262, avoiding parallel original jurisdiction over technical water-sharing frameworks.
- Reinforces the administrative authority of institutional bodies like CWMA during non-normal rainfall years.
Prelims facts
- Article 262 allows Parliament to bar courts from exercising jurisdiction in inter-State water disputes.
- Cauvery basin covers states of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Union Territory of Puducherry.
Mains discussion
- Analyze the constitutional mechanisms under Article 262 for resolving inter-State river water conflicts.
- Evaluate the challenges faced by statutory water management authorities during distress years.
Source: Hindu Business Line
समान विषय · पिछले पेपर
UPSC ने यह पहले भी पूछा है
ये पिछले वर्षों के प्रश्न उसी विषय पर हैं। अभ्यास के लिए खोलें।
-
2016 · Q16 · GS III · 12 marks
With reference to National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) guidelines, discuss the measures to be adopted to mitigate the impact of recent incidents of cloudbursts in many places of Uttarakhand. -
2024 · Q7 · GS III · 10 marks
Industrial pollution of river water is a significant environmental issue in India. Discuss the various mitigation measures to deal with this problem and also the government's initiative in this regard. -
2016 · Q13 · General Studies · 2 marks
What is/are the importance/importances of the 'United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification'? 1. It aims to promote effective action through innovative national programmes and supportive international partnerships. 2. It has a special/particular focus on South Asia and North Africa regions, and its Secretariat facilitates the allocation of major portion of financial resources to these regions. 3. It is committed to a bottom-up approach, encouraging the participation of local people in combating the desertification. Select the correct answer using the code given below -
2026 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
How far has the Indian federal framework been successful in accommodating regional and cultural diversities? Highlight the role of asymmetric federalism and suggest measures to make dispute resolution mechanisms more effective. -
2015 · Q6 · GS II · 12 marks
What are the major changes brought in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1966 through the recent ordinance promulgated by the President? How far will it improve India's dispute resolution mechanism? Discuss.