A
1 only
B
Both 1 and 2
C
Neither 1 nor 2
D
2 only
Correct answer: (a) 1 only
Explanation
Statement 1 is correct because SHRC members and chairpersons are appointed by the Governor based on recommendations from a state-level selection committee. Statement 2 is incorrect because, despite being appointed by the Governor, they can only be removed by the President of India on specific grounds.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2021 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Though the Human Rights Commissions have contributed immensely to the protection of human rights in India, yet they have failed to assert themselves against the mighty and powerful. Analyzing their structural and practical limitations, suggest remedial measures. -
2023 · Q35 · General Studies · 2 marks
Consider the following organizations/bodies in India: 1. The National Commission for Backward Classes 2. The National Human Rights Commission 3. The National Law Commission 4. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission How many of the above are constitutional bodies? -
2018 · Q16 · GS II · 15 marks
Multiplicity of various commissions for the vulnerable sections of the society leads to problems of overlapping jurisdiction and duplication of functions. Is it better to merge all commissions into an umbrella Human Rights Commission? Argue your case. (15). -
2022 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of the National Commission for Backward Classes in the wake of its transformation from a statutory body to a constitutional body. -
2022 · Q79 · General Studies · 2 marks
With reference to the "Tea Board" in India, consider the following statements: 1. The Tea Board is a statutory body. 2. It is a regulatory body attached to the Minister of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. 3. The Tea Board's Head Office is situated in Bengaluru. 4. The Board has overseas offices at Dubai and Moscow. Which of the statements given above are correct?