Revision summary
Patriarchy stores family and caste honour in control of women’s and men’s marriage choice. Honour killing punishes alliances that break endogamy, gotra or status rules. Manoj–Babli, Nitish Katara and Shankar–Kausalya are court-reported illustrations. Shakti Vahini 2018 rejects khap punishment and affirms adult choice. The theme is structured power, not inexplicable rage.
Model answer
Introduction
Patriarchy here is a structured control of women’s sexuality, marriage, and movement, and a ranking of men who ‘own’ family honour. Honour killing is the extreme punishment when a match or friendship is said to soil that honour. The theme is not private madness. It is caste-kinship power using violence to keep endogamy.
Body
Thematic linkage
- Uma Chakravarti’s Brahmanical patriarchy stores caste purity in the daughter’s body; the son’s forbidden love is punished when it mixes rank.
- Srinivas’s endogamy and Dumont’s hierarchy explain why the ‘wrong’ alliance is treated as a group wound, not a couple’s choice.
- North Indian village exogamy and khap-type councils add a territorial rule: the same village or gotra can be named as incestuous even when the law sees two adults.
- Men who kill are often kin claiming to restore male honour; women relatives may be coerced into silence. Patriarchy is a system, not only a father.
Court-reported cases, without spectacle
- The Manoj–Babli case (Kaithal, Haryana, 2007; convictions thereafter) showed a married couple murdered after a khap-linked diktat against their match; courts treated it as murder, not as custom.
- The Nitish Katara murder (2002; later convictions of Vikas Yadav and others) was prosecuted as killing to block an inter-status relationship; the Delhi courts recorded honour as motive, not as defence.
- The Shankar–Kausalya case (Tamil Nadu, 2016; trials and appeals in the public record) concerned an inter-caste marriage and the killing of the husband; it showed the pattern is not only north Indian.
- Shakti Vahini v. Union of India (Supreme Court, 2018) directed states against honour crimes and illegal khap punishments, stating that adults have a right to choose a spouse.
What the cases teach together
- Law now names honour as an aggravating social motive. Local power still tries to outrank the Special Marriage Act and Lata Singh’s line that an adult may choose.
- The Rudolphs’ traditional council meeting modernity is visible: khaps use press conferences and then face IPC murder charges.
- Beteille’s disharmony is lethal here: constitutional equality versus ranked kinship.
Limits of a court-only view
- Many coercive confinements never become FIRs.
- Actionable prevention is housing for couples, swift police against illegal gatherings, and ending impunity, not sermons alone.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Patriarchy control of marriage] --> E[Endogamy caste village rules] E --> H[Honour as group claim] H --> K[Killing of couple or partner] L[Adult choice courts] --> X[Honour not a legal defence]
Conclusion
Honour killing is patriarchy enforcing caste and kin rules on marriage. Public cases from Haryana, Delhi, and Tamil Nadu, and the Shakti Vahini directions, show the courts rejecting honour as a right to kill. The linkage remains because endogamy still organises status.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the challenges faced by the cooperative movements in India. Suggest measures to strengthen the movement at the grass-roots level
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Is honour killing a rural north Indian custom only?
It is denser where khap-type endogamy is strong. Inter-caste killings have also been prosecuted in the south.
-
Can honour be a legal defence?
No. Indian criminal law treats the act as murder. Courts have said custom cannot authorise killing.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Is patriarchy a key to understanding different forms of inequalities in Indian society? Elaborate. -
2022 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the material basis of patriarchy as an ideological system. -
2019 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Define patriarchy. Does it have bearings on women's entitlement in Indian family system ? Explain -
2018 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Western patriarchy which surrenders feminine principles is the development project in India. Do you agree with this view? Why? -
2016 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Patriarchy as a form of dominance. -
2015 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What is patriarchy? How does it affect the child socialization pattern in India?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Highlight the significant features of A.R. Desai's 'Dialectical Perspective' to study Indian Society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai studies Indian society as historical materialism, not as a harmonious village. Caste and custom are read as ideology over agrarian class. The colonial and planning state are part of the contradiction, not neutral umpires. Village studies of consensus are criticised as incomplete. The method is strong on land, labour, and struggle.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"The decade of 1950s was the golden period of village studies in Indian Sociology." Explain the statement
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
The 1950s joined planning, Community Development, and intensive village ethnography. Srinivas, Dube, Marriott, Bailey, Mayer and others built the classic monographs. Dominant caste, factions, and the field view came from this decade. The village was treated as a keyhole to Indian society. Beteille and class analysis later limited that claim.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyse the differences between the attributional and interactional approach in studying the caste system
Caste System
Attributional caste scores groups by listed traits such as diet, occupation and ritual. Ghurye and colonial lists exemplify that approach. Interactional caste ranks groups by who gives and receives food, service and honour. Marriott, Dumont and Srinivas made interaction the test of hierarchy. Lived rank can diverge from textbook attributes.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.