Revision summary
Book-view caste is textual hierarchy and purity ideology. Field-view caste is observed dominant caste, interaction, and split of class and power. Srinivas, Marriott, and Beteille corrected Indology without erasing texts. Balance means values plus village practice. Singh’s modernizing tradition needs both sources.
Model answer
Introduction
- Book-view caste was India as a text: varna, purity, and sacred law. Field-view caste is India as observed rank, land, and faction. Together they stop sociology from treating either the shastra or the village as the whole story.
Body
Book-view
- Indology and Louis Dumont’s homo hierarchicus read caste as an ideology of purity and impurity organised from Brahmanical texts.
- G. S. Ghurye listed features from history and scripture. The living jati could look like a footnote.
- The book-view explains why hierarchy feels legitimate. It does not explain who actually commands the harvest.
Field-view as correction
- M. N. Srinivas’s Rampura replaced varna charts with dominant caste, Sanskritization, and faction.
- McKim Marriott’s interactional ranking used food, honour, and transaction, not only a textual ladder.
- Andre Beteille’s Sripuram split caste, class, and power, so hierarchy was no longer one seamless sacred order.
Balance
- Texts still matter as villagers’ own language of rank. Observation shows when land, vote, and office rewrite that language.
- Yogendra Singh’s modernization of tradition needs both: orthogenetic ideas and heterogenetic field change.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD BV[Book-view texts Dumont Ghurye] --> ID[Purity hierarchy] FV[Field-view Rampura Sripuram] --> DC[Dominant caste class power] ID --> BL[Balanced caste study] DC --> BL
Conclusion
Field-view balanced book-view by putting interaction, land, and politics beside ideology. Caste studies that keep Dumont’s values and Srinivas’s village together are stronger than either pole alone.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Does field-view abolish Dumont?
No. It shows that purity ideology is not the only ranking principle on the ground.
-
Is Ghurye only book-view?
He is text-led and historical. He is not an ethnographer of one village in Srinivas’s sense.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Textual perspective is important in understanding of Indian Social System.' Discuss. -
2023 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"The decade of 1950s was the golden period of village studies in Indian Sociology." Explain the statement -
2023 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main features of Land Reforms in post-independence India -
2022 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain how land reforms brought about desired agrarian transformation. -
2022 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the challenges during village studies in India. -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India -
2019 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Define patriarchy. Does it have bearings on women's entitlement in Indian family system ? Explain -
2017 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Compare the north Indian kinship System with the South Indian kinship system
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Ambedkar’s annihilation is destruction of birth-based graded inequality. Temple and dining reform are not enough if scripture still ranks people. Intermarriage, equal law, education and power are the means. Sanskritization is mobility inside caste, not annihilation. Village harmony without equality is not his goal.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss different forms of kinship system in India
Caste System
Karve divided Indian kinship into regional zones, not one national family type. North India leans patrilineal, patrilocal and village-exogamous. South India more often permits close-kin and cross-cousin marriage. Matriliny exists in pockets and is not a footnote. Kinship carries caste endogamy and gender control.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critically examine briefly the phrase "Little 'Republics" as used to denote India's villages
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Metcalfe’s little republics pictured villages as closed self-rule. Srinivas found factions and dominant caste, not a civic assembly. Dumont denied that the village is the true social whole. Ambedkar treated the village as a site of Dalit unfreedom. Panchayati raj is a modern construction, not a recovered republic.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.