Revision summary
Karve divided Indian kinship into regional zones, not one national family type. North India leans patrilineal, patrilocal and village-exogamous. South India more often permits close-kin and cross-cousin marriage. Matriliny exists in pockets and is not a footnote. Kinship carries caste endogamy and gender control.
Model answer
Introduction
Indian kinship is not one joint family. Irawati Karve mapped regions of descent, marriage, and household. Forms vary by line, residence, and who may marry whom.
Body
Karve’s regional forms
- The northern zone is largely patrilineal, patrilocal, and village-exogamous, with hypergamy and a strong seed line in Leela Dube’s later gender reading.
- The southern zone allows close-kin marriage, including cross-cousin ties, and a different circle of alliance than the north.
- Eastern and central zones mix Dravidian and Indo-Aryan patterns; tribal belts add their own clans.
Descent and household
- Patriliny dominates much of the plains. Matriliny among groups such as the Nayar historically and the Khasi still organises house and inheritance differently.
- Joint household, nuclear urban household, and stem family coexist. Srinivas saw the joint family as a process, not a museum piece.
Alliance and caste
- Dumont stressed marriage as alliance that reproduces hierarchy.
- Endogamy of jati sits on all these forms, which is why kinship is also a caste machine.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD K[Karve zones] --> N[North patriliny village exogamy] K --> S[South close-kin marriage] K --> M[Matriliny pockets] N --> C[Caste endogamy] S --> C
Conclusion
Forms of kinship in India are regional systems of descent, residence, and marriage, as Karve showed. They are not a single Hindu joint family, and they remain the social net through which caste and gender travel.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically examine briefly the phrase "Little 'Republics" as used to denote India's villages
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Is the joint family the Indian form?
It is one household arrangement, stronger in some classes and regions. It is not the kinship system itself.
-
Does urbanisation erase these forms?
Households shrink. Endogamy, gotra rules and regional marriage circles often survive.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyse the differences between the attributional and interactional approach in studying the caste system -
2023 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Do you agree with the view of Andre Beteille that India's villages are representative of Indian society's basic civilizational values ? Present a sociological overview -
2022 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
In the context of changing Indian society, how do you view Andre Beteille's conceptions of harmonic and disharmonic social structures ? -
2022 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elaborate on changing nature of caste system with suitable illustrations. -
2022 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the different forms of untouchability in India. -
2021 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the main features of the debate between G. S. Ghurye and V. Elwin on tribal development -
2021 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the various forms of untouchability in India ? Critically examine -
2020 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
How does Andre Beteille justify 'middle class in India?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste system studies in India have been dominated by the "book-view" initially, How did the entry of "field-view" bring about a balance in the study of Indian caste system? Discuss
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Book-view caste is textual hierarchy and purity ideology. Field-view caste is observed dominant caste, interaction, and split of class and power. Srinivas, Marriott, and Beteille corrected Indology without erasing texts. Balance means values plus village practice. Singh’s modernizing tradition needs both sources.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Ambedkar’s annihilation is destruction of birth-based graded inequality. Temple and dining reform are not enough if scripture still ranks people. Intermarriage, equal law, education and power are the means. Sanskritization is mobility inside caste, not annihilation. Village harmony without equality is not his goal.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critically examine briefly the phrase "Little 'Republics" as used to denote India's villages
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Metcalfe’s little republics pictured villages as closed self-rule. Srinivas found factions and dominant caste, not a civic assembly. Dumont denied that the village is the true social whole. Ambedkar treated the village as a site of Dalit unfreedom. Panchayati raj is a modern construction, not a recovered republic.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.