Revision summary
Ambedkar’s annihilation is destruction of birth-based graded inequality. Temple and dining reform are not enough if scripture still ranks people. Intermarriage, equal law, education and power are the means. Sanskritization is mobility inside caste, not annihilation. Village harmony without equality is not his goal.
Model answer
Introduction
Annihilation of caste, for B. R. Ambedkar, is not a plea to be kinder inside the ladder. It is the destruction of the religious and social system that grades human beings as high and low by birth.
Body
What must be destroyed
- Caste is a graded inequality, not a mere division of labour. Endogamy, untouchability, and the denial of knowledge hold it up.
- Reform of dining and temple entry is too thin if the shastras still sacralise rank.
- Hindu society, in his 1936 address, cannot be a nation while caste splits morality itself.
What annihilation requires
- Intermarriage and a common moral law, not only a common census label.
- Education, legal rights, and political power for the depressed classes so they are not clients of patrons.
- A turn from birth-dharma to liberty, equality, and fraternity as public creed.
Contrast
- Sanskritization climbs the ladder. Annihilation pulls the ladder down.
- Gandhi’s village harmony and Ghurye’s Hindu whole were, for Ambedkar, not the same as freedom.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD C[Graded inequality] --> A[Annihilation] A --> L[Law education intermarriage] SK[Sanskritization] --> LADDER[Climb the ladder] A --> DOWN[Remove the ladder]
Conclusion
Annihilation of caste means ending the sacred hierarchy and the social practices that reproduce it. It is a programme of law, mixing, and equal dignity, not a call to polish caste into a gentler custom.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss different forms of kinship system in India
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Did Ambedkar only want conversion?
Conversion was one exit. The 1936 text first demands that Hindu society itself abandon caste as dharma.
-
Is reservation annihilation?
It is a tool against disability. Annihilation is the larger end of a casteless public morality.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critically examine briefly the phrase "Little 'Republics" as used to denote India's villages -
2021 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Is Indian society moving from "Hierarchy" towards "differentiation" ? Illustrate your answer with suitable examples -
2021 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss in detail the major contribution of Prof. Yogendra Singh in theorizing India's modernization -
2021 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Underline the socio-cultural factors) responsible for India's skewed sex-ratio -
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Rising 'ethnocentricism' is leading to conflict in our society. Assess this statement with appropriate reasons -
2021 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the role of social media in communal polarisation. Suggest ways to combat it -
2020 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society. -
2020 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste system studies in India have been dominated by the "book-view" initially, How did the entry of "field-view" bring about a balance in the study of Indian caste system? Discuss
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Book-view caste is textual hierarchy and purity ideology. Field-view caste is observed dominant caste, interaction, and split of class and power. Srinivas, Marriott, and Beteille corrected Indology without erasing texts. Balance means values plus village practice. Singh’s modernizing tradition needs both sources.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss different forms of kinship system in India
Caste System
Karve divided Indian kinship into regional zones, not one national family type. North India leans patrilineal, patrilocal and village-exogamous. South India more often permits close-kin and cross-cousin marriage. Matriliny exists in pockets and is not a footnote. Kinship carries caste endogamy and gender control.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critically examine briefly the phrase "Little 'Republics" as used to denote India's villages
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Metcalfe’s little republics pictured villages as closed self-rule. Srinivas found factions and dominant caste, not a civic assembly. Dumont denied that the village is the true social whole. Ambedkar treated the village as a site of Dalit unfreedom. Panchayati raj is a modern construction, not a recovered republic.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.