Revision summary
Planning was directed modernization through the state. It delivered industry and Green Revolution gains unevenly. Class and caste shaped who benefited. Displacement was built into big projects. The idea survives after 1991 in a market-friendly form.
Model answer
Introduction
Developmental planning in India was the state’s attempt to modernize economy and society by design: Five-Year Plans, mixed economy, and a promise of growth with justice. Sociologically it is a heterogenetic state project that tradition and inequality recast on the ground.
Body
The idea
- Planning treated poverty, industry, and agrarian change as problems the Centre could sequence, from community development to Green Revolution targets.
- Yogendra Singh would read it as modernization of tradition through a legal-rational state, not as a copy of Soviet society.
Social content
- A. R. Desai saw planning as a bourgeois path that strengthened rich peasants and capital more than labour.
- Caste and region decided who entered IITs, factories, and irrigated belts, so the plan was never a caste-blind machine.
- Displacement of Adivasis for dams showed planning as a national good that local people paid for.
After the Plans
- Liberalisation did not end the idea; it changed the planner from licence-permit to infrastructure and welfare schemes.
- The idea remains: the state still claims to steer development, now with markets as partners.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Five-Year planning] --> G[Growth irrigation industry] P --> U[Uneven caste class] P --> D[Displacement] L[Liberalisation] --> P2[Planning as infrastructure welfare]
Conclusion
Developmental planning in India is a state theory of directed change. It modernized industry and irrigation unevenly, reproduced class-caste advantage, and still shapes how the republic talks about the future.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Comment on the role of co-operatives in rural development
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Did planning fail because it was socialist?
It was a mixed-economy project. Its social failure was uneven inclusion, not only licence delays.
-
Is NITI Aayog the end of the idea?
The Commission form changed. Steering development remains a state claim.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Education is a key to social development. Elucidate -
2024 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critically examine the relevance of development planning in India -
2021 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the sociological significance of the New Education Policy and its thrust on vocationalization and skill development -
2021 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
The problem of displacement is inherent in the idea of development. Analyze the statement critically -
2020 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss in detail the main issues of development planning in mixed economy like India -
2019 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the importance of Development Planning in India Mixed Economy, and analyze its problems and prospects -
2018 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How do you relate the growth of development of metropoles and its impact on the mental and social life of people in India. -
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on Education and equality in India.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste system studies in India have been dominated by the "book-view" initially, How did the entry of "field-view" bring about a balance in the study of Indian caste system? Discuss
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Book-view caste is textual hierarchy and purity ideology. Field-view caste is observed dominant caste, interaction, and split of class and power. Srinivas, Marriott, and Beteille corrected Indology without erasing texts. Balance means values plus village practice. Singh’s modernizing tradition needs both sources.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Ambedkar’s annihilation is destruction of birth-based graded inequality. Temple and dining reform are not enough if scripture still ranks people. Intermarriage, equal law, education and power are the means. Sanskritization is mobility inside caste, not annihilation. Village harmony without equality is not his goal.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss different forms of kinship system in India
Caste System
Karve divided Indian kinship into regional zones, not one national family type. North India leans patrilineal, patrilocal and village-exogamous. South India more often permits close-kin and cross-cousin marriage. Matriliny exists in pockets and is not a footnote. Kinship carries caste endogamy and gender control.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.