Revision summary
Industry linked some peasants to mills, cooperatives and wages. It displaced others through dams, mines and land take. A commercial rich-peasant layer grew; labour became migrant and informal. COVID reverse migration showed the village as fallback. Boon or bane depends on who keeps land and who only sells cheap labour.
Model answer
Introduction
Industrial development in India has been both a boon and a bane for agrarian classes. It opened wages and markets for some. It displaced others and recast the village as a labour reserve.
Body
Boon
- Agro-industry, sugar cooperatives in Maharashtra, and milk unions such as AMUL linked kisans to a wider market, a Thorner kisan who is not only a subsistence tiller.
- Factory and construction jobs pulled surplus labour, easing some pressure on tiny holdings.
- Green Revolution inputs and later food processing thickened a commercial rich-peasant layer in Punjab and western Uttar Pradesh.
Bane
- A. R. Desai read industrial-capitalist growth as strengthening rich peasants and capital while leaving mazdoors insecure.
- Dams, steel, and mining displaced Adivasi and small peasants, so national industry was a local land loss.
- Informal industrial labour, visible in COVID reverse migration, showed that the village remains a fallback, not a partner in secure wages.
- Pollution and groundwater collapse in industrial-agrarian belts hit smallholders who cannot buy their way out.
Class structure recast
- Intermediary landlords declined; a rural rich linked to contractors and mills rose.
- Worker-peasants commute. Dominant castes still overlap with land, as Srinivas’s insight travels.
- SECC-type deprivation counts show landlessness beside industrial skylines.
Verdict
- It is a boon where industry pays and buys without taking the field.
- It is a bane where industry is enclosure, casual labour, and a poisoned canal.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD I[Industry] --> B[Wages markets cooperatives] I --> N[Displacement informal labour] B --> RP[Rich peasant] N --> M[Worker peasant mazdoor]
Conclusion
Industrial development is neither a simple boon nor a simple bane. It transformed agrarian class structure toward commercial farmers and migrant labour. Who wins still follows land, caste, and the terms of displacement.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Give an account of Ranajit Guha's approach in studying 'subaltern class'
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Did industry end the peasant?
It multiplied worker-peasants. It did not empty the agrarian class map.
-
Are cooperatives enough?
They help commodity producers. Landless labour needs wages and titles too.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changes taking place in the industrial class structure in India. -
2023 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Elaborate the salient features and the role of middle class in India's democracy and development -
2023 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the implications and the impact of globalization in situating the changing agrarian class structure in Indin -
2022 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that the agrarian class structure in India is changing ?Justify your answer with illustrations. -
2022 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the changing nature of industrial working class. -
2021 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the salient features of 'new middle class' in India -
2018 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on the changing roles of middle-class women in India. -
2018 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How has the New Economic Policy (1991) affected the lifestyle and life changed in new middle class in India.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate Srinivas's views on religion and society among the Coorgs
Religion and Society
Srinivas studied Coorg religion as observed social structure. The okka and ancestor cult knit kin and land. Hinduism appears as graded ritual interaction, not a church of equals. Sanskritization and local dominance already organise prestige. The monograph founds his later field view of Indian society.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Illustrate the contribution of the Tebhaga Movement to the peasants struggle in India
Social Movements in Modern India
Tebhaga demanded two-thirds of the crop for the sharecropper. Kisan Sabha organisation made it a mass peasant movement in Bengal. It placed class tenancy at the heart of the freedom-era agrarian question. Women and bargadars joined harvest defence. Its unfinished legal lesson returned in Operation Barga.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Colonial settlements created landlord, ryot, and village-share grids. Abolition, tenancy laws and ceilings cut intermediaries unevenly. Rich peasants and reverse tenancy recast who commands surplus. Operation Barga and FRA try to title tillers and forest dwellers. Records still lag the field.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.