Revision summary
Ethno-nationalism is political selfhood built on ethnic peoplehood. Tribal discontent is fed by land alienation and extractive development. Colonial and later schedules created a legal identity that still lacks power. PESA and FRA are under-implemented self-rule tools. Assimilation theses deepen the wound they claim to heal.
Model answer
Introduction
Ethno-nationalism is the claim that a people defined by language, origin, or culture should be a political self, sometimes a nation, sometimes an autonomous region. Tribal discontent in India is often this claim meeting a developmental state that arrives as dispossession.
Body
Ethno-nationalism
- It organises solidarity around ethnicity rather than around class alone. Naga, Mizo, Bodo, and Jharkhand movements show the range from sovereignty talk to statehood inside India.
- It is not automatically secession. Democratic federalism can absorb it as councils and states.
- G. S. Ghurye’s Hinduisation thesis treats such identity as a lag to be assimilated. That reading itself feeds discontent.
Critical factors of tribal discontent
- Land and forest: alienation, mines, and dams in the central Indian belt make the nation appear as a taker of the commons.
- Administrative othering: the 1935 colonial segregation and later Scheduled Tribe lists created a legal people, then often a neglected people.
- Cultural disrespect: language, faith, and council ignored in school and police practice.
- Uneven citizenship: reservation without title, PESA and FRA on paper, Fifth Schedule governors who do not shield.
- Elite capture and splintering: a small tribal middle class enters office while the majority remain on the fringe, which Andre Beteille’s inequality lens would expect.
- Security response: insurgency and counter-insurgency thicken distrust where the first grievance was land.
Link
- Ethno-nationalism becomes the language of discontent when class poverty is lived as a people’s wound, not only as a household’s wage.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Ethno-national people claim] --> D[Discontent] L[Land mines dams] --> D W[Weak PESA FRA] --> D A[Autonomy councils] --> R[Remedy]
Conclusion
Ethno-nationalism names a people as a political unit. Tribal discontent in India is driven by land loss, cultural misrecognition, weak self-rule laws, and a state that plans over the village. Autonomy with title is the sociological remedy, not assimilation as backward Hindus.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is industrial development in India a bane or a born to agrarian class structure ? Substantiate your answer with suitable examples
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is all tribal politics ethno-nationalist?
Class unions and party votes also exist. Land-as-people is still a central grammar.
-
Does federalism end discontent?
It can if councils control land. A paper statehood with open mines will not.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment. -
2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the definitional problems concerning the tribal communities in India. -
2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the colonial policy of segregation of tribes under the Government of India Act, 1935. -
2020 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyze the issues related to the citizenship in contemporary India. Give suitable illustrations. -
2019 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the growing assertion of tribal community for autonomy in India -
2019 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the critical issues of commercialization of higher education in India -
2019 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What is 'social security'? Examine recent security measures adopted by the Government in India -
2018 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Examine sociological dynamics of Champaran Peasant Movement in colonial India.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate Srinivas's views on religion and society among the Coorgs
Religion and Society
Srinivas studied Coorg religion as observed social structure. The okka and ancestor cult knit kin and land. Hinduism appears as graded ritual interaction, not a church of equals. Sanskritization and local dominance already organise prestige. The monograph founds his later field view of Indian society.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Illustrate the contribution of the Tebhaga Movement to the peasants struggle in India
Social Movements in Modern India
Tebhaga demanded two-thirds of the crop for the sharecropper. Kisan Sabha organisation made it a mass peasant movement in Bengal. It placed class tenancy at the heart of the freedom-era agrarian question. Women and bargadars joined harvest defence. Its unfinished legal lesson returned in Operation Barga.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Colonial settlements created landlord, ryot, and village-share grids. Abolition, tenancy laws and ceilings cut intermediaries unevenly. Rich peasants and reverse tenancy recast who commands surplus. Operation Barga and FRA try to title tillers and forest dwellers. Records still lag the field.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.