Revision summary
Industry linked some peasants to mills, cooperatives and wages. It displaced others through dams, mines and land take. A commercial rich-peasant layer grew; labour became migrant and informal. COVID reverse migration showed the village as fallback. Boon or bane depends on who keeps land and who only sells cheap labour.
Model answer
Introduction
Industrial development in India has been both a boon and a bane for agrarian classes. It opened wages and markets for some. It displaced others and recast the village as a labour reserve.
Body
Boon
- Agro-industry, sugar cooperatives in Maharashtra, and milk unions such as AMUL linked kisans to a wider market, a Thorner kisan who is not only a subsistence tiller.
- Factory and construction jobs pulled surplus labour, easing some pressure on tiny holdings.
- Green Revolution inputs and later food processing thickened a commercial rich-peasant layer in Punjab and western Uttar Pradesh.
Bane
- A. R. Desai read industrial-capitalist growth as strengthening rich peasants and capital while leaving mazdoors insecure.
- Dams, steel, and mining displaced Adivasi and small peasants, so national industry was a local land loss.
- Informal industrial labour, visible in COVID reverse migration, showed that the village remains a fallback, not a partner in secure wages.
- Pollution and groundwater collapse in industrial-agrarian belts hit smallholders who cannot buy their way out.
Class structure recast
- Intermediary landlords declined; a rural rich linked to contractors and mills rose.
- Worker-peasants commute. Dominant castes still overlap with land, as Srinivas’s insight travels.
- SECC-type deprivation counts show landlessness beside industrial skylines.
Verdict
- It is a boon where industry pays and buys without taking the field.
- It is a bane where industry is enclosure, casual labour, and a poisoned canal.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD I[Industry] --> B[Wages markets cooperatives] I --> N[Displacement informal labour] B --> RP[Rich peasant] N --> M[Worker peasant mazdoor]
Conclusion
Industrial development is neither a simple boon nor a simple bane. It transformed agrarian class structure toward commercial farmers and migrant labour. Who wins still follows land, caste, and the terms of displacement.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Write a note on the changing roles of middle-class women in India.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q1(d)). View answer →
-
Did industry end the peasant?
It multiplied worker-peasants. It did not empty the agrarian class map.
-
Are cooperatives enough?
They help commodity producers. Landless labour needs wages and titles too.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changes taking place in the industrial class structure in India. -
2023 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Elaborate the salient features and the role of middle class in India's democracy and development -
2023 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the implications and the impact of globalization in situating the changing agrarian class structure in Indin -
2022 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that the agrarian class structure in India is changing ?Justify your answer with illustrations. -
2022 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the changing nature of industrial working class. -
2021 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the salient features of 'new middle class' in India -
2018 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on the changing roles of middle-class women in India. -
2018 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How has the New Economic Policy (1991) affected the lifestyle and life changed in new middle class in India.
More from this topic
Q4(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Industrial class structure is a function of social structure of Indian society." Do you agree with this statement? Analyze
Social Classes in India
Indian industrial classes include owners, managers, a small formal workforce and a large informal majority. Recruitment, unions and job queues follow caste, kinship, language and sending villages. Breman, Holmström and Ramaswamy show particularism inside industry, not a pure proletariat. Owners too are often community-based business groups. Capitalism reworks these ties but has not replaced them with a casteless class structure.
Q3(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Describe the main features of Indian new middle class. How is it different from the old middle class?
Social Classes in India
The old middle class grew from colonial education, law and bureaucracy and later staffed the Nehruvian state. The new middle class grew after 1991 around private services, IT and consumption. Béteille and Misra describe the older service stratum; Fernandes describes the consumer-citizen. Caste and English schooling shape entry into both. The new class is larger but still a minority; it has not absorbed the informal majority.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Identify different forms of inequalities associated with agrarian social structure in India
Social Classes in India
Agrarian structure organises land, labour, caste and household. Class forms include owners, tenants, landless and new reverse tenancy. Caste maps onto field labour and honour in the village. Women’s farm work without title is a central inequality. Region and ecology split irrigated surplus growers from dryland and forest poor.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.