Revision summary
BSUP served the urban poor in large JNNURM cities with housing and basic services. IHSDP did similar work in smaller urban centres. The aim was shelter, water, and sanitation, not cultural branding. Relocation and weak livelihoods limited gains. The urban poor need in-place services plus work, not only distant units.
Model answer
Introduction
BSUP and IHSDP were JNNURM-era housing and services schemes for the urban poor. BSUP targeted cities; IHSDP targeted smaller urban centres. They were not a programme for an ‘urban poet’. They were a state attempt to put water, toilets, and shelter on the slum map.
Body
What the two programmes were
- Basic Services to the Urban Poor (BSUP) funded integrated housing and civic services in large mission cities.
- Integrated Housing and Slum Development Programme (IHSDP) extended a similar housing-plus-services idea to smaller towns.
- The package typically meant dwelling units, water, sanitation, and some community infrastructure.
Sociological promise
- Ambedkar’s city as exit needs a roof, not only a wage. Tenure and toilets are caste and gender issues in the slum.
- Women’s reproductive and public-domain safety improve when toilets are not a night field.
What went wrong in practice
- Relocation to peri-urban edges broke jobs, a socio-spatial harm like heritage beautification evictions.
- Eligibility lists missed tenants and recent migrants.
- Quality and maintenance lagged; a house without a livelihood is not inclusion.
- A. R. Desai’s class eye: without cheap well-located land, the poor remain a residual of metropolitan growth.
Note’s verdict
- The schemes named the urban poor as citizens of infrastructure.
- Delivery often produced peripheral colonies rather than upgraded livelihoods in place.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD BSUP[BSUP large cities] --> HS[Housing water toilets] IHSDP[IHSDP smaller towns] --> HS RL[Relocation lists jobs] --> FL[Delivery gap] HS --> UP[Urban poor citizenship]
Conclusion
BSUP and IHSDP were mission programmes to house and service the urban poor in big and small towns. They mattered as a rights vocabulary of water and shelter. They fell short where relocation, lists, and jobs were ignored. Call them urban-poor housing missions, never a poet’s scheme.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is BSUP a poetry or culture scheme?
No. It is a housing and basic-services programme for the urban poor.
-
Did the schemes end slums?
They built stock and some services. Informal rental and new migration continued.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the challenges in Implementing the Rural Development Programmes in India -
2019 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the changing democratic profile of India -
2019 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Highlight the main features of the 'Inter-linking of Rivers' project in India. What could be its probable advantages to Indian agriculture? -
2018 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Has Green Revolution led to the formation of new power elite in rural India? Elaborate your answer. -
2017 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a short note a changing means of production and increased rural poverty -
2017 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Compare the pressing problems of a dalit poor family living in an urban slum with a similar type of family living in a rural setting -
2016 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for rural development -
2016 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Write a note on the uneven impact of 'Green Revolution' on rural society.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on G.S.Ghurye's Indological perspective of understanding Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Ghurye’s Indological perspective reads India through texts and Hindu civilisation. Caste and Race listed structural features and rejected a crude race theory. Tribe was treated as a backward Hindu awaiting assimilation. Field sociologists showed living rank and power that books do not fix. Class and minority self-rule further limit the method.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village.
Caste System
Sripuram split caste, class, and power in a Tanjore village. Land reform and democracy made the structure disharmonic. The study corrected harmony functionalism and a fused sacred hierarchy. Limits are Brahmin-centred fieldwork, thin gender, and one-village scale. Use it as a method, not as all of India.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Media is the fourth pillar of democracy. Discuss.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
The fourth-pillar claim is that media watches the three official organs. Speech rights and investigative reporting sometimes fulfil it. Ownership, paid news, and communal frames weaken it. Women, caste, and rural poor are unevenly seen. The phrase is an ideal to enforce, not a fact already achieved.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.