Revision summary
Sripuram split caste, class, and power in a Tanjore village. Land reform and democracy made the structure disharmonic. The study corrected harmony functionalism and a fused sacred hierarchy. Limits are Brahmin-centred fieldwork, thin gender, and one-village scale. Use it as a method, not as all of India.
Model answer
Introduction
Andre Beteille’s Sripuram study in Tanjore treated one village as a laboratory of caste, class, and power. The analysis is strong because it broke the single sacred hierarchy. It is limited because one agraharam-centred village cannot be India.
Body
What Sripuram showed
- Brahmins, dominant peasants, and Adi-Dravida labour did not form one functional whole in M. N. Srinivas’s harmony sense.
- Land reform and the vote shifted class and power even when caste identity remained.
- Harmonic hierarchy, where inequality is morally accepted, gave way to a disharmonic structure: equality as public value, rank as practice.
Strengths
- It separated three dimensions that Ghurye’s civilisational caste and Dumont’s purity often fused.
- It kept fieldwork without pretending the village was a closed republic.
Critiques
- The agraharam lens can over-centre Brahmins and under-see women’s kinship, which Leela Dube later insisted on.
- A. R. Desai would still want a fuller colonial class history than one Tanjore snapshot.
- Generalising Tamil wet-rice agrarian change to dry or tribal India is unsafe.
- Power outside the village—parties, mills, the state—appears, but the monograph still pulls the eye inward.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SR[Sripuram Tanjore] --> CC[Caste] SR --> CL[Class] SR --> PW[Power] DH[Disharmonic equality] --> SR LM[Scale gender] --> CR[Critique]
Conclusion
- Beteille’s Tanjore village is a critical classic: caste is not class is not power, and modern India is disharmonic. The critique is scale, gender thinness, and the temptation to let Sripuram stand for the nation.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Media is the fourth pillar of democracy. Discuss.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Did Beteille deny Dumont?
He denied that purity ideology is the only ranking principle on the ground.
-
Is Sripuram a dominant-caste village like Rampura?
It is a different agrarian mix. The lesson is analytical split, not a copy of Srinivas’s Mysore.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
How does Andre Beteille justify 'middle class in India? -
2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss. -
2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions? -
2017 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the changes in the cultural and structural aspects of the caste system since independence? -
2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How has B.R. Ambedkar identified the features of caste system ? How is it different from the mainstream treatment of caste features ? -
2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss Andre Beteille account of the relationship between caste, class and power as a change from symmetrical to asymmetrical one. -
2015 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system -
2015 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Is caste system changing, weakening or disintegrating in India?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on G.S.Ghurye's Indological perspective of understanding Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Ghurye’s Indological perspective reads India through texts and Hindu civilisation. Caste and Race listed structural features and rejected a crude race theory. Tribe was treated as a backward Hindu awaiting assimilation. Field sociologists showed living rank and power that books do not fix. Class and minority self-rule further limit the method.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Media is the fourth pillar of democracy. Discuss.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
The fourth-pillar claim is that media watches the three official organs. Speech rights and investigative reporting sometimes fulfil it. Ownership, paid news, and communal frames weaken it. Women, caste, and rural poor are unevenly seen. The phrase is an ideal to enforce, not a fact already achieved.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on the changing roles of middle-class women in India.
Social Classes in India
Education and service jobs changed middle-class women’s public roles. 1991 widened office and consumer identities. Kinship still assigns care, honour, and endogamy. Poorer women subsidise this change as domestic labour. The new role is recombination, not the end of patriarchy.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.