Revision summary
Irrigated HYV regions grew a commercial rich-peasant elite. Dominant caste and machines fused into rural power. Neo-farmers’ unions are this elite’s politics. Rainfed and landless India were not included. Elite formation is regional, not all-India.
Model answer
Introduction
Yes, with regional limits. The Green Revolution formed a commercially armed rich-peasant elite in irrigated belts. It did not create the same elite in rainfed and tribal India. The new power is input capital, surplus grain, and unions, often riding dominant caste.
Body
What the new elite is
- Farmers who own or control irrigated land, machines, and market links, hiring labour rather than only family hands.
- They overlap with M. N. Srinivas’s dominant caste: Jats, Yadavs in some tracts, Okkaligas, and similar peasant groups.
- A. R. Desai read them as the class that incomplete land reform strengthened.
How Green Revolution produced them
- HYV seed, fertiliser, credit, and procurement in Punjab, Haryana, and western UP turned surplus into political voice.
- Tractor and tube well are status as well as tools.
- Neo-farmers’ movements are this elite in the street, demanding MSP and power subsidy.
Limits of the claim
- Eastern and dryland India did not get the same package; labour-export villages did not grow this elite.
- Landless Dalits and women did not join the elite; they joined the hired gang.
- Urban traders, politicians, and agribusiness now share power, so the village elite is not closed.
Swaminathan’s later diagnosis
- The Commission treated this commercial farmer as both a food producer to secure and a distressed debtor, which shows elite and squeeze can coexist.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD GR[Green Revolution inputs MSP] --> EL[Rich peasant elite] DC[Dominant caste land] --> EL EL --> MV[Neo-farmers unions] RF[Rainfed tribal] --> NO[No same elite]
Conclusion
- The Green Revolution did form a new rural power elite in surplus belts: a machine-and-market peasantry on a dominant-caste base. It did not nationalise that elite. Rural power elsewhere still runs on older landlords, mines, or out-migration.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Write a note on Basic Services to Urban Poet (BSUP) and Integrated Housing and Slum Development (IHSD) programme provided for the urban poor.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is this elite the same as the old zamindar?
Usually no. It is often an occupancy or rich peasant, not a rentier absentee.
-
Did the elite end rural poverty?
It ended some hunger in surplus belts. It hired poverty as labour.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the challenges in Implementing the Rural Development Programmes in India -
2019 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the changing democratic profile of India -
2019 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Highlight the main features of the 'Inter-linking of Rivers' project in India. What could be its probable advantages to Indian agriculture? -
2018 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Write a note on Basic Services to Urban Poet (BSUP) and Integrated Housing and Slum Development (IHSD) programme provided for the urban poor. -
2017 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a short note a changing means of production and increased rural poverty -
2017 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Compare the pressing problems of a dalit poor family living in an urban slum with a similar type of family living in a rural setting -
2016 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme for rural development -
2016 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Write a note on the uneven impact of 'Green Revolution' on rural society.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on G.S.Ghurye's Indological perspective of understanding Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Ghurye’s Indological perspective reads India through texts and Hindu civilisation. Caste and Race listed structural features and rejected a crude race theory. Tribe was treated as a backward Hindu awaiting assimilation. Field sociologists showed living rank and power that books do not fix. Class and minority self-rule further limit the method.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village.
Caste System
Sripuram split caste, class, and power in a Tanjore village. Land reform and democracy made the structure disharmonic. The study corrected harmony functionalism and a fused sacred hierarchy. Limits are Brahmin-centred fieldwork, thin gender, and one-village scale. Use it as a method, not as all of India.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Media is the fourth pillar of democracy. Discuss.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
The fourth-pillar claim is that media watches the three official organs. Speech rights and investigative reporting sometimes fulfil it. Ownership, paid news, and communal frames weaken it. Women, caste, and rural poor are unevenly seen. The phrase is an ideal to enforce, not a fact already achieved.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.