Revision summary
The old working-class problem was the mill and the union. The informal majority now faces hidden employers and no career. Migration and home-based women’s work broke the factory neighbourhood. Caste and gender structure the worst informal tasks. Organisation must follow the chain, not wait for a mill gate.
Model answer
Introduction
The informal-sector working class in India now faces problems of no employer, no union, and no career, more than the old mill-strike against a visible factory boss. The nature of the problem changed with liberalisation and rural out-migration.
Body
Older working-class problems
- Organised mills and plantations had wages, unions, and a clear opponent. Desai could map industrial class in that frame.
- Informal work always existed. It was not yet the majority story of ‘working class’ in public talk.
Changing problems
- Contract chains hide the principal employer. Social security codes struggle to find a contributor.
- Circular migrants, women home-workers, and app or workshop casuals lack the mill neighbourhood as a solidarity space.
- Skill polarisation: a small formal core, a large unprotected periphery.
- Caste and gender sort tasks: Dalit sanitation, women domestic work, Muslim artisanal clusters.
What remains
- Surplus extraction remains. The form of struggle shifts to street-vendor law, NREGA fallback, and sporadic strikes.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MILL[Mill union boss] --> OLD[Old working class] INF[Contractor migrant home work] --> NEW[Informal problems] NEW --> SEC[No security no union]
Conclusion
Informal working-class problems changed from factory bargaining to insecurity without a workplace community. The class is larger and harder to organise, not less exploited.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Issues relating to the informal labour market in urban India.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q5(d)). View answer →
-
Is the working class disappearing?
The mill form shrank. The working class as sellers of labour grew in informal shape.
-
Do labour codes solve this?
They can name the worker. Delivery needs a visible employer and organisation.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Elaborate the causes, consequences and other concerns of growth of urban settlements in India. -
2019 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elucidate the concerns of growing urban displacement dynamics in India -
2019 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Do you think that 'demonetization' has accelerated the economic growth in India? How do you understand the in formalization of labour, underemployment and gender discrimination in this context? -
2018 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Construct a sociological narrative on the increasing trend of child abuse in India. -
2017 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that the issue of child labour raises questions about and beyond the informal sector ? Give reasons. -
2017 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the impact of heritage tourism on urban socio-spatial patterns in India -
2016 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Write a detailed note on the effects of growing slums in urban areas. -
2015 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Issues relating to the informal labour market in urban India.
More from this topic
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the trend of urbanization in India. Do you think that Industrialization is the only precondition of urbanization? Give you arguments
Industrialization and Urbanisation in India
India’s urbanisation is rising but remains metro-concentrated and full of census towns and slums. Kundu’s exclusionary urbanisation captures labour demand without inclusive housing. Tertiary growth, administrative history, transport and agrarian distress urbanise besides factories. Industrial belts exist and matter; they do not exhaust the trend. Policy that waits only for industry misses actually existing urban India.
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you think that law has been able to abolish child labour in India? Comment.
Industrialization and Urbanisation in India
The 1986 Act as amended in 2016 bans most child work under 14 but allows family-enterprise help. RTE adds a schooling right that is unevenly realised. Child labour persists in agriculture, kilns, domestic and home-based informal work. Poverty, caste occupations and weak inspection explain the gap between statute and practice. Law delegitimised the practice more than it abolished it.
Q2(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
'Agrarian class structure has been undergoing changes due to modern forces.' Critically examine
Industrialization and Urbanisation in India
Thorner’s malik–kisan–mazdoor map still orients agrarian class, with caste as the usual skin. Land reform thinned intermediaries unevenly; ceilings and tenancy left loopholes. Green Revolution and commercial farming produced capitalist farmers and a larger hired workforce. MGNREGA, migration and peri-urban land markets further split classes. Change is real but not a uniform national shift from feudalism to pure agrarian capitalism.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.