Q3(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q3(b) Q4(c) →

Comment on the increasing significance of caste in politics.

Topic: Perspectives on the study of Indian society. Syllabus: Perspectives on the study of Indian society: Indology (G.S. Ghurye); Structural functionalism (M.N. Srinivas); Marxist sociology (A.R. Desai). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Perspectives on the study of Indian society.

Revision summary

Democracy organised caste as interest and identity. Kothari called this politicisation, not disappearance. Mandal and Dalit assertion expanded who counts as a political caste. Dominant castes converted land-numbers into legislatures. This is rising political caste, not a return of total ritual order.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

Caste has grown more significant in Indian politics even as some village ritual declined. Democracy did not dissolve jati; it organised it as a vote, a quota, and a public name.

Body

Why increasing

  • Rajni Kothari’s politicisation of caste: parties need clusters, and caste is a ready cluster.
  • Mandal and OBC assertion made the middle of the ladder a national political subject.
  • Reserved seats, panchayat quotas, and census talk keep caste on the file.

What changed, not vanished

  • Srinivas’s dominant caste entered Vidhan Sabhas. Beteille’s asymmetry means ritual rank is not the same as MLA power.
  • Dalit parties and Ambedkarite symbols made the bottom a political identity, not only a disability.

Caution

  • Caste in politics is not the same as the old jajmani. It is competitive dignity and share.
  • Class and religion still cut it. A single caste rarely wins a nation.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  V[Vote quota] --> POL[Caste in politics]
  K[Kothari] --> POL
  M[Mandal Dalit parties] --> POL

Conclusion

Caste’s political significance has increased because the vote rewards organised ascriptive groups. That is transformation of caste, not proof that sociology should return to Dumont’s whole as the state.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Different forms of Dalit assertion

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q4(c)). View answer →

  • Does more caste politics mean caste is stronger in marriage?

    Not automatically. Endogamy can stay while occupation rules fade. Both can be true.

  • Is this vote-bank only?

    Vote-bank is the insult. Representation of graded inequality is the democratic claim.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    What is caste politics? Substantiate your answer with examples of how identities are defined by caste dynamics

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Bring out the debates of 'insiders' and 'outsiders' approaches in understanding Indian society.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

• The insider (emic) approach studies Indian society using native categories, sacred texts, and cultural immersion, championed by G.S. Ghurye and D.P. Mukerji. • Critics argue the insider view suffers from upper-caste bias and ignores ground realities in favor of normative texts. • The outsider (etic) approach applies universal models and comparative frameworks, famously used by Western scholars like Louis Dumont. • Critics dismiss the outsider view as orientalist reductionism that imposes Western concepts and misinterprets local idioms. • Modern Indian sociology bridges this binary through a reflexive methodology combining cultural familiarity with analytical rigor. • Ultimately, combining native insights with objective scrutiny is essential to capture India's complex social dynamics.

Q5(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Discuss the challenges faced by the aged people in receiving 'elder care'.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

• India's aging population faces severe elder care challenges due to the breakdown of traditional joint families and youth out-migration. • Over 80% of seniors lack formal pensions because they worked in the informal sector, worsening financial vulnerability. • High out-of-pocket medical costs for chronic illnesses quickly drain meager personal savings. • Public hospitals suffer from an acute shortage of geriatric specialists, dedicated wards, and rehabilitation facilities. • Implementation of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 remains weak, leaving legal tribunals overburdened. • Solutions require shifting from a welfare approach to a rights-based framework, combining community care networks with strict legal enforcement under Article 41.

Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Compare G. S. Ghurye's and A. R. Desai's approaches used in understanding Indian society

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

• **Ghurye’s Indological Approach:** Relied on sacred texts and classical literature to study Indian society through civilizational continuity. • **Core Themes in Ghurye:** Focused on caste, kin, and how Hinduism historically integrated diverse tribal and regional groups. • **Desai’s Materialist Approach:** Rejected textual idealism in favor of Marxist political economy to study social structures. • **Economic Formations:** Analyzed Indian society through successive modes of production—ancient, feudal, and colonial capitalist. • **Caste vs. Class:** Viewed caste and religion as superstructural elements that mask underlying economic exploitation. • **Critique of State and Nationalism:** Argued that the nationalist movement was bourgeois, leaving agrarian inequalities intact post-independence. • **Key Contrast:** Ghurye highlights cultural tradition and integration, while Desai emphasizes economic power and class conflict.

PDF