Q1(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1(a) Q1(d) →

Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical

Topic: Perspectives on the study of Indian society. Syllabus: Perspectives on the study of Indian society: Indology (G.S. Ghurye); Structural functionalism (M.N. Srinivas); Marxist sociology (A.R. Desai). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Perspectives on the study of Indian society.

Revision summary

Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.

Model answer

Introduction

Jyotirao Phule was an agrarian radical because he joined caste slavery to landlord and Brahman power over the tiller. Gulamgiri and Shetkaryacha Asud made the peasant, not the priest, the measure of justice.

Body

Agrarian reading of caste

  • Phule saw the bahujan cultivator as the producer robbed by rent, ritual fee, and denial of knowledge.
  • Brahmanical texts, for him, were a licence for this robbery, not a sacred order in Dumont’s later sense.
  • Satyashodhak work and schools for girls and ati-shudras were agrarian politics: without letters, the field stays a field of others.

Radical, not only reformer

  • He wanted a peasant-shudra alliance against twice-born monopoly, closer to later non-Brahman and Dalit assertion than to temple reform alone.
  • Gail Omvedt and later sociologists read him as a founder of anti-caste agrarian thought in Maharashtra.

Limit

  • He wrote before industrial class language. A. R. Desai’s nationalism-as-bourgeoisie thesis is a later grid; Phule’s enemy was priest-plus-landlord, not only capital.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  P[Phule] --> T[Tiller bahujan]
  T --> E[Extracted by rent and ritual]
  P --> S[Satyashodhak school]

Conclusion

Phule is an agrarian radical because he named caste as a system that extracts from the cultivator. Education and Satyashodhak organisation were his tools against that extraction.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q1(d)). View answer →

  • Was Phule only against Brahmans?

    He targeted a system of ritual and land extraction. The Brahman was the ideologue of that system, not the only oppressor.

  • Is he a Marxist?

    He is a precursor of class-caste agrarian critique. He did not use Marx’s categories.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2015 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals

    View answer →

  2. 2015 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables

    View answer →

  3. 2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Feminization of poverty.

    View answer →

  4. 2015 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss Marxist approach to the analysis of Indian nationalism.

    View answer →

  5. 2015 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    What are the basic tenets of Hindu religion? Is Hinduism based on monotheism or polytheism?

    View answer →

  6. 2015 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Why is it necessary to implement PCPNDT Act in India?

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Main objective of Tribal sub plan (TSP)

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss B.R. Ambedkar as a wise democrat.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

"Educational development is the only Panacea for country's all ills and evils." Critically examine the above statement with reference to NEP-2020

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Education is necessary for mobility and anti-caste citizenship but not a solo panacea. NEP 2020 reforms structure, language, vocation and equity on paper. Without teachers, public finance and jobs, it becomes credentialism and a dual private-public system. Caste, land and informal labour reproduce ills that schooling alone cannot dissolve. Phule–Ambedkar were right to start with the school and wrong if we stop there.

Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

What are the Private and Public network and support systems operative in Indian society for the aged? Suggest measures to curb down the challenges before care givers of the aged

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Private support for the aged is still mainly kin, plus a small paid-care market. Public support is pensions, NPHCE and the 2007 Maintenance Act, all thin relative to need. Nuclear residence and migration weaken the joint-family guarantee without ending dependence. Caregivers, mostly women, face time poverty and little respite. Measures must combine adequate pensions, home services and gender-equal family law.

Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Bring out various factors responsible for declining of village Industries in India.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Village industries declined through colonial competition, forest enclosure and the collapse of patronage. Post-independence mill goods, power-looms and plastics continued the squeeze. Credit, GST, and migration now pull youth out of hereditary crafts. Some clusters brand and survive; most artisan households enter informal labour. The process reorders caste occupations, not only GDP shares.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.