Q1(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q7(c) Q1(b) →

Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals

Topic: Perspectives on the study of Indian society. Syllabus: Perspectives on the study of Indian society: Indology (G.S. Ghurye); Structural functionalism (M.N. Srinivas); Marxist sociology (A.R. Desai). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Perspectives on the study of Indian society.

Revision summary

Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.

Model answer

Introduction

Verrier Elwin treated tribal freedom as the right to keep land, language, and council, not as a gift of sudden assimilation. Isolation for him was a shield until Adivasis could meet the plains on fair terms.

Body

Freedom as protection

  • Elwin argued that colonial and Hindu plains pressure stole forest, liquor custom, and self-rule. Freedom meant a National Park style of protection, later softened into a slower joining.
  • He opposed G. S. Ghurye’s view of tribes as backward Hindus. For Elwin, Hinduisation was often loss, not uplift.
  • Nehru’s tribal Panchsheel later echoed this: develop without imposing, and leave land and dance intact.

What freedom was not

  • It was not museum freeze. Elwin wanted medicine and schools that did not erase the village.
  • It was not missionary or contractor freedom to enter as they pleased.

Limit

  • Critics said isolation could stall citizenship and reservation. Integration through Schedules, PESA, and the Forest Rights Act tries to keep Elwin’s land-freedom inside the republic.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  E[Elwin] --> P[Protect land language council]
  G[Ghurye] --> H[Hinduisation]
  P --> I[Panchsheel FRA PESA]

Conclusion

Elwin’s tribal freedom is autonomy of habitat and custom against assimilation. The useful remainder is rights-based integration, not Ghurye’s Hinduisation as destiny.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q1(b)). View answer →

  • Did Elwin want tribes cut off forever?

    No. He wanted delayed, fair contact so land and custom were not the first things taken.

  • Is his view anti-development?

    He opposed mines-and-missions development. He accepted schools and health that left self-rule standing.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2015 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical

    View answer →

  2. 2015 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables

    View answer →

  3. 2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Feminization of poverty.

    View answer →

  4. 2015 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss Marxist approach to the analysis of Indian nationalism.

    View answer →

  5. 2015 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    What are the basic tenets of Hindu religion? Is Hinduism based on monotheism or polytheism?

    View answer →

  6. 2015 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Why is it necessary to implement PCPNDT Act in India?

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Main objective of Tribal sub plan (TSP)

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss B.R. Ambedkar as a wise democrat.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

"Educational development is the only Panacea for country's all ills and evils." Critically examine the above statement with reference to NEP-2020

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Education is necessary for mobility and anti-caste citizenship but not a solo panacea. NEP 2020 reforms structure, language, vocation and equity on paper. Without teachers, public finance and jobs, it becomes credentialism and a dual private-public system. Caste, land and informal labour reproduce ills that schooling alone cannot dissolve. Phule–Ambedkar were right to start with the school and wrong if we stop there.

Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

What are the Private and Public network and support systems operative in Indian society for the aged? Suggest measures to curb down the challenges before care givers of the aged

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Private support for the aged is still mainly kin, plus a small paid-care market. Public support is pensions, NPHCE and the 2007 Maintenance Act, all thin relative to need. Nuclear residence and migration weaken the joint-family guarantee without ending dependence. Caregivers, mostly women, face time poverty and little respite. Measures must combine adequate pensions, home services and gender-equal family law.

Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Bring out various factors responsible for declining of village Industries in India.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Village industries declined through colonial competition, forest enclosure and the collapse of patronage. Post-independence mill goods, power-looms and plastics continued the squeeze. Credit, GST, and migration now pull youth out of hereditary crafts. Some clusters brand and survive; most artisan households enter informal labour. The process reorders caste occupations, not only GDP shares.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.