Q6(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q7(c) Q7(b) →

How does a multicultural society accommodate diversities of all kinds-ethnic, linguistic, and religious? Discuss its major challenges

Topic: Religion and Society. Syllabus: Religion and Society: Sociological theories of religion; Types of religious practices: animism, monism, pluralism, sects, cults; Religion in modern society: religion and science, secularization, religious revivalism, fundamentalism. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Religion and Society.

Revision summary

Multiculturalism is public recognition of ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity. Accommodation uses constitutions, federalism, language policy and civil mixing. India is a principal case of pluralism inside a democratic republic. Challenges include majoritarianism, communal violence and segregated everyday life. Inequality that maps onto community turns culture into conflict. Group rights can clash with gender justice and with a common civic status.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

A multicultural society is one in which several ethnic, linguistic and religious communities live under one political order and claim public recognition, not only private worship. Accommodation means more than tolerance in the home. It means rules, resources and everyday habits that let diversity persist without civil war. The major challenges are those that turn diversity into hierarchy or into separate warring publics.

Body

How accommodation works

Bhikhu Parekh and Will Kymlicka have argued that liberal states can grant group-differentiated rights, such as language in schools or personal law in limited fields, while keeping a common citizenship. India is a major laboratory. The Constitution recognises linguistic states, minority educational rights, and freedom of religion. Federalism and the Official Languages framework try to accommodate language. Personal laws and, in a different way, the debate over a uniform civil code show the tension between community and equal citizenship. Everyday multiculturalism, as studied in cities, includes markets, schools and neighbourhoods where people deal across difference without becoming one culture.

Accommodation also needs a civil society that is not only communal. Inter-caste and inter-faith associations, a relatively independent press, and public universities have been sites of mixing. T. K. Oommen and others have written on pluralism in India as a historical pattern, not a recent import of a Canadian slogan. The nation-state still supplies a civic umbrella: vote, law and public employment.

Major challenges

Majoritarianism treats the largest religious or linguistic group as the owner of the nation and others as guests. That logic weakens accommodation. Segregation in housing, schools and marriage can produce what some writers call living separately under one flag. Economic inequality, when it maps onto ethnicity or religion, turns cultural difference into class conflict. Communal violence and riots destroy trust that law alone cannot quickly rebuild. A weak common civic culture leaves only community bosses as spokesmen. Feminists have criticised multicultural accommodation when it shelters patriarchal personal laws. Ambedkar’s warning about caste shows that diversity is not only a bouquet of equal cultures. Some differences are structures of oppression.

Global migration has made Western states face similar tests of language, religion and race. The Indian case adds caste and a civilisation of many traditions inside one republic. Successful accommodation is therefore a daily political and educational labour, not a once-and-for-all settlement.

Flow diagram

Flow diagram

Conclusion

Multicultural societies accommodate ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity through law, federal arrangements, rights and everyday mixing. The major challenges are majoritarianism, segregation, mapped inequality and a thin civic bond. Diversity survives when equal citizenship is strong enough to hold difference without ranking it.

Quick related

Students also ask

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2018 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Discuss the challenges thrown by religious revivalism to a secular nation-state.

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Underline the role of social media in contemporary social movements and describe its challenges

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the challenges involved in collecting data through census method

    View answer →

  4. 2021 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Explain the emerging challenges in establishing gender equality in the informal sector

    View answer →

  5. 2021 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Elucidate the main problems and challenges faced by the migrant labourers in the recent 'Lockdown period'

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution

How does the rise of new 'cults' and 'sects' influence intercaste relations?

Religion and Society

• Neo-religious sects and cults act as catalysts, altering traditional ritual hierarchies and intercaste dynamics. • Groups like Radhasoami and Brahma Kumaris create egalitarian spaces where caste markers are secondary. • They continue Bhakti traditions, offering lower castes dignity and spiritual authority denied by orthodox structures. • Sectarian affiliation aids upward mobility, helping groups shed stigmatized identities through behavioral purification. • Independent economic and educational resources reduce lower-caste dependence on dominant agrarian castes. • While sometimes reproducing internal stratification, these sects largely promote societal democratization and equality.

Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution

What is the nature of relationship between science and religion in modern society? Analyze with suitable examples

Religion and Society

Comte expected science to replace theology; Weber expected disenchantment of technique. Secularisation is regional, not a universal emptying of faith. Relations include conflict, institutional separation and practical coexistence. Berger’s later desecularisation thesis matches much of the contemporary world. India shows high-tech science beside public ritual and sacred politics. The modern pattern is differentiation plus plurality, not a simple war.

PDF