Q5(e) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5 Q6 →

Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change.

Topic: Social Change in Modern Society. Syllabus: Social Change in Modern Society: Sociological theories of social change; Development and dependency; Agents of social change; Education and social change; Science, technology and social change. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2022 and Social Change in Modern Society.

Revision summary

Modernisation theory pictured a Western path of social change. Frank and Wallerstein made underdevelopment a product of the world-system. Sen shifted the end from growth to capabilities. Sustainable and movement perspectives pluralised the good. Indian planning, 1991, and SHGs illustrate successive recipes.

Model answer

Introduction

Development perspectives on social change have moved from a single Western path, through critiques of dependency, to human development and alternative ecological paths. Each stage renamed who changes, and toward what.

Body

Modernisation

  • After 1945, W. W. Rostow’s stages and Daniel Lerner’s passing of traditional society treated the West as the future.
  • Talcott Parsons’s pattern variables supplied a social-system story of achievement and universalism.
  • M. N. Srinivas’s Sanskritisation and Westernisation were Indian cousins of a modernisation idiom.

Dependency and world-system

  • Andre Gunder Frank argued that underdevelopment is produced by the core, not by missing modernity.
  • Immanuel Wallerstein mapped core, semi-periphery, and periphery as a single capitalist world-system.
  • Social change is then polarising, not catching up.

Later turns

  • Basic needs, then Amartya Sen’s capabilities, shifted the goal from growth to what people can do.
  • Sustainable and post-development critiques, and new social movements, questioned industrial change as the only good.
  • Indian planning, liberalisation after 1991, and SHG-led micro-inclusion sit on this trajectory as state, market, and community recipes.

Thread

  • From evolutionist optimism, to structured inequality, to plurality of ends.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  M[Modernisation Rostow Parsons] --> D[Dependency Frank]
  D --> W[Wallerstein world-system]
  W --> H[Human development Sen]
  H --> A[Alternative ecological]

Conclusion

The trajectory runs modernisation, dependency and world-system, then human and alternative development. Frank and Wallerstein broke the one-path story. Sen and ecological movements changed the meaning of a good change.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2023 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Examine the role of science and technology in addressing age-old taboos and superstitions

    View answer →

  2. 2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment.

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate.

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    How do you understand the relationship between patriarchy and social development ?

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario.

    View answer →

  7. 2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    View answer →

  8. 2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Delimit the scope of sociology in relation to other social sciences.

Sociology

Sociology studies patterned relations among groups and institutions as a whole. Comte, Durkheim, Weber, and Marx named that object in different ways. Economics, political science, psychology, history, and anthropology cut the same life along one axis. Census and NFHS already show large-scale social structure. The limit is complementary science, not a takeover of every neighbouring field.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

How does a researcher achieve objectivity in interpretative research?

Sociology as Science

Interpretative research studies meaning, not only counts. Weber kept value-relevance in problem choice and demanded value-discipline in proof. Harding’s strong objectivity names the researcher’s location. Geertz, prolonged fieldwork, triangulation, and respondent checks test the reading. Empathy without evidence is not objectivity.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment.

Social Change in Modern Society

Information is a report; data are information organised for a research question. Durkheim turned official suicide counts into sociological data by classification. Blumer warned that grids can freeze living meanings. Census and NFHS are public information until a defined indicator is built. Numbers alone do not make data.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.