Q5(d) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q4(b) Q8(b) →

To what extent is patriarchy a cause for the problems of women? Discuss

Topic: Sociology. Syllabus: Sociology — The Discipline: Modernity and social changes in Europe and emergence of sociology; Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences; Sociology and common sense. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Sociology.

Revision summary

Patriarchy is systemic male dominance across household, work, and state. It is a major cause of unpaid care, violence, and restricted agency. Oakley, Walby, and Engels supply the core tools. Class and caste intersect; they do not erase the gendered pattern. Extent: necessary and large, not a sole cause of every problem.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

Patriarchy is a system of male dominance across household, work, sexuality, culture, and the state. It is a major cause of women’s problems. It is not the only cause, because class and caste organise which women suffer what.

Body

Extent as a cause

  • Sylvia Walby named linked patriarchal structures. Ann Oakley made unpaid housework visible as a problem of work, not of nature.
  • Friedrich Engels tied women’s subordination to private property, a Marxist root that still leaves patriarchy a relatively persistent order.
  • Violence, restricted mobility, and son preference, which NFHS files, are organised as male right, not as accidents.

Extent as not the only cause

  • Karl Marx: class decides who can buy safety and schooling. Poor women face a double load.
  • Caste honour can intensify control of women as status property, a Weberian closure.
  • Talcott Parsons’s expressive female role was an ideology of industrial family, not a law of nature, yet class still shapes who stays home.

Discussion

  • Patriarchy is a necessary cause of the gendered pattern of problems.
  • It is not a sufficient cause of every woman’s situation. Intersection is the extent-limit.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  PAT[Patriarchy] --> LAB[Unpaid care wage gap]
  PAT --> VIO[Violence mobility]
  CL[Class caste] --> INT[Intersection]
  PAT[PAT] --> INT[INT]

Conclusion

Patriarchy causes a large share of women’s problems in labour, body, and law. Oakley, Walby, and Engels name the mechanisms. Class and caste decide intensity and form. The extent is structural and high, not total and single.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • How is Durkheim's theory of religion different from Max Weber's theory of religion?

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q8(b)). View answer →

  • If some women hold office, has patriarchy ended?

    Office for a few is compatible with unpaid care and violence for many. Extent is about structures.

  • Are men unharmed by patriarchy?

    Rigid masculinities harm men too. The system still privileges men as a category.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2018 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Define patriarchy. How does patriarchy manifest in interpersonal relations?

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution

Discuss the significance and limitations of 'intersectionality' in social research

Sociology

Intersectionality, coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw, examines how overlapping identities like race, class, and gender shape systemic oppression. Its significance in social research lies in capturing lived realities beyond single-axis frameworks and preventing reductive generalisations. However, limitations include methodological complexity, risks of infinite regress, and difficulties in operationalising fluid categories. Effective application requires balancing structural macro-analysis with micro-level lived experiences.

Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · Solution

Discuss the intellectual origins of sociology and its evolution as a distinct field of study

Sociology

Sociology arose in 19th-century Western Europe to make sense of massive upheavals caused by the Industrial and French Revolutions. Enlightenment thinkers laid the groundwork by championing reason, empirical observation, and human agency over traditional dogma. Auguste Comte gave the discipline its name, pushing for a positivist "physics of society" based on scientific laws. Émile Durkheim secured its academic legitimacy by defining "social facts" and using empirical methods to study human behavior. Max Weber introduced interpretive sociology, while Karl Marx focused on material conditions and class struggle. In the 20th century, Talcott Parsons advanced structural-functionalism to study systemic equilibrium. Later, conflict theories, the Frankfurt School, and postmodern critiques broadened the field to address power and marginalisation. Today, sociology continues to evolve by analyzing globalisation, digital shifts, and modern identity politics.

PDF