Q8(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q8 Q8 →

Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Topic: Social Change in Modern Society. Syllabus: Social Change in Modern Society: Sociological theories of social change; Development and dependency; Agents of social change; Education and social change; Science, technology and social change. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Social Change in Modern Society.

Revision summary

COVID-19 was organised by labs, states, and inequalities, not by gadgets alone. Merton’s science norms met vaccine nationalism. Apps and WFH extended bureaucratic control; gig riders took exposure. Digital divide and reverse migration split the experience. Beck’s risk and dependency of patents mark the politics of S&T.

Model answer

Introduction

COVID-19 was a biological event organised by science, the state, and everyday inequality. Robert Merton’s sociology of science, Ulrich Beck’s risk society, and Michel Foucault’s biopolitics are better guides than a hymn to gadgets. Technology saved lives and rationed them.

Body

Science as institution

  • Merton’s CUDOS norms (communism of knowledge, universalism, disinterestedness, organised scepticism) were strained by vaccine nationalism and preprint noise.
  • Laboratories, trials, and the WHO made a global fact. Dependency theory notes who owned patents and who waited.

Technology of control and care

  • Testing, sequencing, oxygen plants, and mRNA and other vaccine platforms were productive forces in Marx’s sense, suddenly politicised.
  • Apps, lists, and work-from-home dashboards extended Weber’s iron cage into the phone. Surveillance mixed with relief.
  • Gig delivery and platform ratings kept urban middle-class consumption alive while riders faced exposure.

Unequal experience

  • Digital divide: online school and telemedicine for some; informal workers without data, documents, or a Census-stable address.
  • Reverse migration was a low-tech fact of walking bodies beside a high-tech media of infection curves.
  • Gendered unpaid care absorbed hospital overflow at home.

Risk, trust, and the public

  • Beck’s risk society: manufactured uncertainty, expert disagreement, and blame.
  • Durkheim: anomie when rules of gathering, work, and funeral broke; new rituals online.
  • Civil controversy over lockdown science showed that “follow the science” is also a political sentence.

Democratisation question

  • Inclusive development needs shared vaccines, open data, and occupational safety, not only a national app.
  • Informal labour remained outside most techno-fixes.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  ST[Science and technology] --> VAC[Vaccines tests oxygen]
  ST --> APP[Apps WFH surveillance]
  ST --> UNQ[Patents digital divide]
  COVID[COVID-19] --> ST
  MIG[Reverse migrants] --> LOW[Low-tech walk]
  PROF[Salaried] --> APP

Conclusion

Science and technology shaped COVID-19 as vaccines, files, apps, and WFH, and as patent and digital inequality. Merton, Beck, Weber, and Frank’s hierarchy explain the split. The migrant walk and the laptop office were one pandemic, two technological worlds.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Highlight the roles and functions of civil society in a democratic system.

    Next question in the 2021 paper (Q8). View answer →

  • Did technology cause the migrant crisis?

    No. Informal work and a sudden halt did. Technology then counted cases more easily than it counted walkers.

  • Is an app a public health system?

    It can support tracing. Without testing, care, and food it is a file, not a hospital.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment.

    View answer →

  2. 2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change.

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate.

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    How do you understand the relationship between patriarchy and social development ?

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario.

    View answer →

  7. 2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation.

    View answer →

  8. 2020 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Technology has accelerated the process of development and dependency. Discuss.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Do you think ethnomethodology helps us in getting reliable and valid data ? Justify your answer

Sociology

Garfinkel studies members’ methods, indexicality, and accountability. That can validate how categories are produced, including official ones. Reliability of national rates needs stable instruments such as Census and NFHS. Cicourel links ethnomethodology to the making of statistics. Justify: yes for interactional validity; no as a sole reliability design.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.